R. v. Hamelin (E.O.), (2001) 297 A.R. 201 (QB)

Document

Cited authorities 81

Cited in 8

Precedent Map

Judge	Watson, J.
Court	Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
Case Date	August 20, 2001
Citations	(2001), 297 A.R. 201 (QB);2001 ABQB 742

R. v. Hamelin (E.O.) (2001), 297 A.R. 201 (QB)

MLB headnote and full text

Temp. Cite: [2001] A.R. TBEd. SE.005

Her Majesty the Queen (respondent) v. Earl Oliver Hamelin (appellant)

(Action No. 9917-28014-S101001; 2001 ABQB 742)

Indexed As: R. v. Hamelin (E.O.)

Alberta Court of Queen's Bench

Judicial District of Fort McMurray

Watson, J.

August 27, 2001.

Summary:

A summary conviction court convicted the accused of having the care and control of a motor vehicle while his blood-alcohol content was excessive. The accused appealed.

The Alberta Court of Queen's Bench dismissed the appeal.

Civil Rights - Topic 4605

Right to counsel - General - Denial of -Due to lack of time or opportunity - A constable arrested the accused for impaired driving - At a nearby police detachment, the accused was given the use of a phone room so he could contact a lawyer - The accused was unsuccessful in reaching the lawyer of his choice, a Mr. Tralenberg - The constable told the accused that it would be best for him to phone a lawyer - The accused did not contact a lawyer - He supplied breath samples, as requested by the constable - The trial judge admitted the breath test results by way of a certificate - The judge held that when it became clear that Mr. Tralenberg was not going to be contacted, the accused chose to provide the breath samples without the advice of counsel - The judge added that, although the constable committed a "technical" breach of s. 10(b) of the Charter by not telling the accused that the police would hold off taking statements or requiring the accused to participate in anything until he had reasonable time to contact a lawyer, this "technical" breach could not ground a successful s. 24(2) application to exclude the breath sample evidence - The accused was convicted - The Alberta Court of Queen's Bench upheld the decision.

Civil Rights - Topic 4610

Right to counsel - General - Impaired driving - Demand for breath or blood sample - [See Civil Rights - Topic 4605 ].

Civil Rights - Topic 4612

Right to counsel - General - Waiver or abandonment of - [See Civil Rights - Topic 4605 ].

Civil Rights - Topic 8368

Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms - Denial of rights - Remedies - Exclusion of evidence - [See Civil Rights - Topic 4605 ].

Cases Noticed:

R. v. Bartle (K.), [1994] 3 S.C.R. 173; 172 N.R. 1; 74 O.A.C. 161; 92 C.C.C. (3d) 289; 33 C.R.(4th) 1; 6 M.V.R.(3d) 1; 118 D.L.R.(4th) 83, refd to. [para. 4, footnote 1].

R. v. Prosper, [1994] 3 S.C.R. 236; 172 N.R. 161; 133 N.S.R.(2d) 321; 380 A.P.R. 321; 92 C.C.C.(3d) 353; 33 C.R. (4th) 85; 6 M.V.R.(3d) 181; 118 D.L.R.(4th) 154, consd. [para. 4, footnote 2].

R. v. Brydges, [1990] 1 S.C.R. 190; 103 N.R. 282; 104 A.R. 124; 74 C.R.(3d) 129; [1990] 2 W.W.R. 220; 71 Alta. L.R.(2d) 145; 53 C.C.C.(3d) 330; 46 C.R.R. 236, refd to. [para. 9, footnote 3].

R. v. Elefante (1986), 72 A.R. 162; 47 M.V.R. 170 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 24, footnote 4].

R. v. Collins, [1987] 1 S.C.R. 265; 74 N.R. 276; 56 C.R.(3d) 193; [1987] 3 W.W.R. 699; 13 B.C.L.R.(2d) 1; 28 C.R.R. 122; 33 C.C.C.(3d) 1; 38 D.L.R.(4th) 508, refd to. [para. 38, footnote 6].

R. v. Stillman (W.W.D.), [1997] 1 S.C.R. 607; 209 N.R. 81; 185 N.B.R.(2d) 1; 472 A.P.R. 1; 113 C.C.C.(3d) 321; 5 C.R.(5th) 1, refd to. [para. 38, footnote 7].

R. v. Top (1989), 95 A.R. 195; 48 C.C.C.(3d) 493 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 39, footnote 8].

R. v. Goodine (1989), 97 A.R. 102 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 41, footnote 9].

R. v. Burns (R.H.), [1994] 1 S.C.R. 656; 165 N.R. 374; 42 B.C.A.C. 161; 67 W.A.C. 161; 29 C.R.(4th) 113; 89 C.C.C.(3d) 193; 23 W.C.B.(2d) 211, refd to. [para. 44, footnote 10].

R. v. Schmautz, [1990] 1 S.C.R. 398; 106 N.R. 81; 20 M.V.R.(2d) 1; 75 C.R.(3d) 129; 44 B.C.L.R.(2d) 273; [1990] 3 W.W.R. 193; 53 C.C.C.(3d) 556; 45 C.R.R. 245, refd to. [para. 45, footnote 11].

R. v. Harper, [1994] 3 S.C.R. 343; 172 N.R. 91; 97 Man.R.(2d) 1; 79 W.A.C. 1, consd. [para. 45].

R. v. Frazer (1986), 70 A.R. 102 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 47, footnote 12].

R. v. Ewart (M.A.) (1995), 58 B.C.A.C. 70; 96 W.A.C. 70 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 47, footnote 13].

R. v. Joyal (1990), 55 C.C.C. (3d) 233 (Qué. C.A.), leave to appeal denied (1990), 114 N.R. 160; 34 Q.A.C. 159; 58 C.C.C.(3d) vi (S.C.C.), refd to. [para. 47, footnote 14].

R. v. Borden (J.R.), [1994] 3 S.C.R. 145; 171 N.R. 1; 134 N.S.R.(2d) 321; 383 A.P.R. 321; 92 C.C.C.(3d) 404; 33 C.R.(4th) 147; 24 C.R.R.(2d) 51; 119 D.L.R.(4th) 74, refd to. [para. 47, footnote 15].

R. v. Daviault (H.), [1994] 3 S.C.R. 63; 173 N.R. 1; 64 Q.A.C. 81; 33 C.R.(4th) 165; 93 C.C.C.(3d) 21; 24 C.R.R.(2d) 1; 118 D.L.R.(4th) 469; 24 W.C.B.(2d) 586, refd to. [para. 47, footnote 16].

RJR-MacDonald Inc. et Imperial Tobacco Ltd. v. Canada (Procureur général), [1995] 3 S.C.R. 199; 187 N.R. 1; 100 C.C.C.(3d) 449; 127 D.L.R.(4th) 1, refd to. [para. 47, footnote 17].

R. v. Fowler (J.) (1996), 146 Nfld. & P.E.I.R. 271; 456 A.P.R. 271 (Nfld. C.A.), refd to. [para. 48, footnote 18].

R. v. Therens, [1985] 1 S.C.R. 613; 59 N.R. 122; 40 Sask.R. 122; 45 C.R.(3d) 97; [1985] 4 W.W.R. 286; 32 M.V.R. 153; 18 C.C.C.(3d) 481; 18 D.L.R.(4th) 655; 13 C.R.R. 193, refd to. [para. 48, footnote 19].

R. v. Hieronymi (F.) (1995), 84 O.A.C. 321; 101 C.C.C.(3d) 31; 42 C.R.(4th) 69 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 49, footnote 20].

R. v. Cochrane (1988), 96 A.R. 308 (C.A.), affirming (1988), 96 A.R. 308 (Q.B.), refd to. [para. 57, footnote 21].

R. v. Baig, [1987] 2 S.C.R. 537; 81 N.R. 87; 25 O.A.C. 81; 61 C.R.(3d) 97; 45 D.L.R.(4th) 106; 37 C.C.C.(3d) 181; 32 C.R.R. 355, refd to. [para. 57, footnote 22].

R. v. Cobham, [1994] 3 S.C.R. 360; 172 N.R. 123; 157 A.R. 81; 77 W.A.C. 81; 92 C.C.C.(3d) 333; 33 C.R.(4th) 73; 6 M.V.R.(3d) 89, refd to. [para. 58, footnote 23].

R. v. Matheson (R.N.), [1994] 3 S.C.R. 328; 172 N.R. 108; 123 Nfld. & P.E.I.R. 271; 382 A.P.R. 271; 92 C.C.C.(3d) 434; 33 C.R.(4th) 136; 6 M.V.R.(3d) 161; 118 D.L.R.(4th) 323, refd to. [para. 58, footnote 24].

R. v. Pozniak (W.), [1994] 3 S.C.R. 310; 172 N.R. 72; 74 O.A.C. 232; 33 C.R.(4th) 49; 92 C.C.C.(3d) 472; 6 M.V.R.(3d) 113; 118 D.L.R.(4th) 205; 23 C.R.R.(2d) 303, refd to. [para. 58, footnote 25].

R. v. Cutknife (C.K.) (2000), 272 A.R. 172 (Q.B.), refd to. [para. 61, footnote 26].

R. v. Phillips (1986), 69 A.R. 54; 26 C.C.C.(3d) 60 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 62, footnote 27].

R. v. Reid - see R. v. Phillips.

R. v. Manninen, [1987] 1 S.C.R. 1233; 76 N.R. 198; 21 O.A.C. 192; 58 C.R.(3d) 97; 34 C.C.C.(3d) 385; 41 D.L.R.(4th) 301; 38 C.R.R. 37, refd to. [para. 68, footnote 28].

R. v. S.H.M., [1989] 2 S.C.R. 446; 100 N.R. 1; 100 A.R. 321; 71 C.R.(3d) 257; 50 C.C.C.(3d) 503; 69 Alta. L.R.(2d) 209; [1989] 6 W.W.R. 385, refd to. [para. 71, footnote 29].

R. v. Clarkson, [1986] 1 S.C.R. 383; 66 N.R. 114; 69 N.B.R.(2d) 40; 177 A.P.R. 40; 50 C.R.(3d) 289; 25 C.C.C.(3d) 207; 26 D.L.R.(4th) 493; 19 C.R.R. 209, refd to. [para. 72, footnote 30].

R. v. Korponey, [1982] 1 S.C.R. 41; 44 N.R. 103; 26 C.R.(3d) 343; 65 C.C.C.(2d) 65; 132 D.L.R.(3d) 354, refd to. [para. 73, footnote 31].

Korponey v. Canada (Attorney General) - see R. v. Korponey.

R. v. Morin, [1992] 1 S.C.R. 771; 134 N.R. 321; 53 O.A.C. 241; 12 C.R.(4th) 1; 71 C.C.C.(3d) 1; 8 C.R.R.(2d) 193, refd to. [para. 75, footnote 34].

R. v. Strachan, [1988] 2 S.C.R. 980; 90 N.R. 273; 67 C.R.(3d) 87; [1989] 1 W.W.R. 385; 46 C.C.C.(3d) 479; 56 D.L.R.(4th) 673; 37 C.R.R. 335, refd to. [para. 86, footnote 37].

R. v. Burlingham (T.W.), [1995] 2 S.C.R. 206; 181 N.R. 1; 58 B.C.A.C. 161; 96 W.A.C. 161; 97 C.C.C.(3d) 385; 124 D.L.R.(4th) 7; 38 C.R.(4th) 265; 28 C.R.R.(2d) 244, refd to. [para. 88, footnote 39].

R. v. Goldhart (W.), [1996] 2 S.C.R. 463; 198 N.R. 321; 92 O.A.C. 161; 107 C.C.C.(3d) 481; 48 C.R.(4th) 297, refd to. [para. 88, footnote 40].

R. v. Elshaw, [1991] 3 S.C.R. 24; 128 N.R. 241; 3 B.C.A.C. 81; 7 W.A.C. 81; 7 C.R.(4th) 333; 59 B.C.L.R.(2d) 143; 67 C.C.C.(3d) 97; 6 C.R.R.(2d) 1, refd to. [para. 91, footnote 41].

R. v. Jackson (G.G.) (1993), 66 O.A.C. 64; 15 O.R.(3d) 709; 86 C.C.C.(3d) 233 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 92, footnote 42].

R. v. Rilling, [1976] 2 S.C.R. 183; 5 N.R. 327; 31 C.R.N.S. 142; [1975] 6 W.W.R. 626; 24 C.C.C.(2d) 81; 60 D.L.R.(3d) 128, refd to. [para. 98, footnote 44].

R. v. Bernshaw (N.), [1995] 1 S.C.R. 254; 176 N.R. 81; 53 B.C.A.C. 1; 87 W.A.C. 1; [1995] 3 W.W.R. 457; 95 C.C.C.(3d) 193; 35 C.R.(4th) 201; 8 M.V.R.(3d) 75; 26 C.R.R.(2d) 132, refd to. [para. 98, footnote 45].

R. v. Feeney (M.), [1997] 2 S.C.R. 13; 212 N.R. 83; 91 B.C.A.C. 1; 148 W.A.C. 1; 115 C.C.C.(3d) 129; 44 C.R.R.(2d) 1; [1997] 6 W.W.R. 634; 7 C.R.(5th) 101, refd to. [para. 103, footnote 47].

Counsel:

James R. Jacques, for the Crown, respondent;

Art Tralenberg, for the appellant.

Watson, J., of the Alberta Court of Queen's Bench, Judicial District of Fort McMurray, heard this appeal on August 20, 2001, and delivered the following reasons for judgment on August 27, 2001.

To continue reading

Request your trial

Subscribers can access the reported version of this case.

You can sign up for a trial and make the most of our service including these benefits.

Request your trial

Why Sign-up to vLex?

Over 100 Countries

Search over 120 million documents from over 100 countries including primary and secondary collections of legislation, case law, regulations, practical law, news, forms and contracts, books, journals, and more.
Thousands of Data Sources

Updated daily, vLex brings together legal information from over 750 publishing partners, providing access to over 2,500 legal and news sources from the world’s leading publishers.
Find What You Need, Quickly

Advanced A.I. technology developed exclusively by vLex editorially enriches legal information to make it accessible, with instant translation into 14 languages for enhanced discoverability and comparative research.
Over 2 million registered users

Founded over 20 years ago, vLex provides a first-class and comprehensive service for lawyers, law firms, government departments, and law schools around the world.

Subscribers are able to see a list of all the cited cases and legislation of a document.

You can sign up for a trial and make the most of our service including these benefits.

Request your trial

Why Sign-up to vLex?

Over 100 Countries

Search over 120 million documents from over 100 countries including primary and secondary collections of legislation, case law, regulations, practical law, news, forms and contracts, books, journals, and more.
Thousands of Data Sources

Updated daily, vLex brings together legal information from over 750 publishing partners, providing access to over 2,500 legal and news sources from the world’s leading publishers.
Find What You Need, Quickly

Advanced A.I. technology developed exclusively by vLex editorially enriches legal information to make it accessible, with instant translation into 14 languages for enhanced discoverability and comparative research.
Over 2 million registered users

Founded over 20 years ago, vLex provides a first-class and comprehensive service for lawyers, law firms, government departments, and law schools around the world.

Subscribers are able to see a list of all the documents that have cited the case.

You can sign up for a trial and make the most of our service including these benefits.

Request your trial

Why Sign-up to vLex?

Over 100 Countries

Search over 120 million documents from over 100 countries including primary and secondary collections of legislation, case law, regulations, practical law, news, forms and contracts, books, journals, and more.
Thousands of Data Sources

Updated daily, vLex brings together legal information from over 750 publishing partners, providing access to over 2,500 legal and news sources from the world’s leading publishers.
Find What You Need, Quickly

Advanced A.I. technology developed exclusively by vLex editorially enriches legal information to make it accessible, with instant translation into 14 languages for enhanced discoverability and comparative research.
Over 2 million registered users

Founded over 20 years ago, vLex provides a first-class and comprehensive service for lawyers, law firms, government departments, and law schools around the world.

Subscribers are able to see the revised versions of legislation with amendments.

You can sign up for a trial and make the most of our service including these benefits.

Request your trial

Why Sign-up to vLex?

Over 100 Countries

Search over 120 million documents from over 100 countries including primary and secondary collections of legislation, case law, regulations, practical law, news, forms and contracts, books, journals, and more.
Thousands of Data Sources

Updated daily, vLex brings together legal information from over 750 publishing partners, providing access to over 2,500 legal and news sources from the world’s leading publishers.
Find What You Need, Quickly

Advanced A.I. technology developed exclusively by vLex editorially enriches legal information to make it accessible, with instant translation into 14 languages for enhanced discoverability and comparative research.
Over 2 million registered users

Founded over 20 years ago, vLex provides a first-class and comprehensive service for lawyers, law firms, government departments, and law schools around the world.

Subscribers are able to see any amendments made to the case.

You can sign up for a trial and make the most of our service including these benefits.

Request your trial

Why Sign-up to vLex?

Over 100 Countries

Search over 120 million documents from over 100 countries including primary and secondary collections of legislation, case law, regulations, practical law, news, forms and contracts, books, journals, and more.
Thousands of Data Sources

Updated daily, vLex brings together legal information from over 750 publishing partners, providing access to over 2,500 legal and news sources from the world’s leading publishers.
Find What You Need, Quickly

Advanced A.I. technology developed exclusively by vLex editorially enriches legal information to make it accessible, with instant translation into 14 languages for enhanced discoverability and comparative research.
Over 2 million registered users

Founded over 20 years ago, vLex provides a first-class and comprehensive service for lawyers, law firms, government departments, and law schools around the world.

Subscribers are able to see a visualisation of a case and its relationships to other cases. An alternative to lists of cases, the Precedent Map makes it easier to establish which ones may be of most relevance to your research and prioritise further reading. You also get a useful overview of how the case was received.

Request your trial

Why Sign-up to vLex?

Over 100 Countries

Search over 120 million documents from over 100 countries including primary and secondary collections of legislation, case law, regulations, practical law, news, forms and contracts, books, journals, and more.
Thousands of Data Sources

Updated daily, vLex brings together legal information from over 750 publishing partners, providing access to over 2,500 legal and news sources from the world’s leading publishers.
Find What You Need, Quickly

Advanced A.I. technology developed exclusively by vLex editorially enriches legal information to make it accessible, with instant translation into 14 languages for enhanced discoverability and comparative research.
Over 2 million registered users

Founded over 20 years ago, vLex provides a first-class and comprehensive service for lawyers, law firms, government departments, and law schools around the world.

Subscribers are able to see the list of results connected to your document through the topics and citations Vincent found.

You can sign up for a trial and make the most of our service including these benefits.

Request your trial

Why Sign-up to vLex?

Over 100 Countries

Search over 120 million documents from over 100 countries including primary and secondary collections of legislation, case law, regulations, practical law, news, forms and contracts, books, journals, and more.
Thousands of Data Sources

Updated daily, vLex brings together legal information from over 750 publishing partners, providing access to over 2,500 legal and news sources from the world’s leading publishers.
Find What You Need, Quickly

Advanced A.I. technology developed exclusively by vLex editorially enriches legal information to make it accessible, with instant translation into 14 languages for enhanced discoverability and comparative research.
Over 2 million registered users

Founded over 20 years ago, vLex provides a first-class and comprehensive service for lawyers, law firms, government departments, and law schools around the world.

8 practice notes

R. v. Gratton (A.L.), (2002) 329 A.R. 208 (QB)
- Canada
- Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
- December 3, 2002
...1; 115 C.C.C.(3d) 129; 7 C.R.(5th) 101; 44 C.R.R.(2d) 1; [1997] 6 W.W.R. 634, refd to. [para. 190, footnote 33]. R. v. Hamelin (E.O.) (2001), 297 A.R. 201 (Q.B.), refd to. [para. 191, footnote 34]. R. v. Manninen, [1987] 1 S.C.R. 1233; 76 N.R. 198; 21 O.A.C. 192; 34 C.C.C.(3d) 385; 41 D.L.R......
R. v. L.T.H., (2008) 379 N.R. 247 (SCC)
- Canada
- Canada (Federal) Supreme Court (Canada)
- September 11, 2008
...36 (Surrey), [2002] 4 S.C.R. 710; 299 N.R. 1; 175 B.C.A.C. 161; 289 W.A.C. 161; 2002 SCC 86, refd to. [para. 98]. R. v. Hamelin (E.O.) (2001), 297 A.R. 201; 2001 ABQB 742, refd to. [para. Statutes Noticed: Youth Criminal Justice Act, S.C. 2002, c. 1, sect. 146 [Appendix]. Authors and Works ......
R. v. Tessier (C.V.), (2006) 408 A.R. 305 (PC)
- Canada
- Provincial Court of Alberta (Canada)
- June 30, 2006
...ABPC 211, refd to. [para. 13]. R. v. Ketchum (H.J.) (1999), 260 A.R. 340; 1999 ABPC 157, refd to. [para. 13]. R. v. Hamelin (E.O.) (2001), 297 A.R. 201; 2001 ABQB 742, refd to. [para. R. v. Buffalo (D.A.) (2003), 337 A.R. 120; 2003 ABQB 124, refd to. [para. 13]. R. v. Luong (G.V.) (2000), 2......
R. v. L.T.H., 2008 SCC 49
- Canada
- Supreme Court (Canada)
- September 11, 2008
...[2002] 1 S.C.R. 769, 2002 SCC 23; Chamberlain v. Surrey School District No. 36, [2002] 4 S.C.R. 710, 2002 SCC 86; R. v. Hamelin (2001), 297 A.R. 201, 2001 ABQB 742; Schwartz v. Canada, [1996] 1 S.C.R. 254; Stein v. The Ship “Kathy K”, [1976] 2 S.C.R. Statutes and Regulations Cited Canadian ......

Request a trial to view additional results

7 cases

R. v. Gratton (A.L.), (2002) 329 A.R. 208 (QB)
- Canada
- Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
- December 3, 2002
...1; 115 C.C.C.(3d) 129; 7 C.R.(5th) 101; 44 C.R.R.(2d) 1; [1997] 6 W.W.R. 634, refd to. [para. 190, footnote 33]. R. v. Hamelin (E.O.) (2001), 297 A.R. 201 (Q.B.), refd to. [para. 191, footnote 34]. R. v. Manninen, [1987] 1 S.C.R. 1233; 76 N.R. 198; 21 O.A.C. 192; 34 C.C.C.(3d) 385; 41 D.L.R......
R. v. L.T.H., (2008) 379 N.R. 247 (SCC)
- Canada
- Canada (Federal) Supreme Court (Canada)
- September 11, 2008
...36 (Surrey), [2002] 4 S.C.R. 710; 299 N.R. 1; 175 B.C.A.C. 161; 289 W.A.C. 161; 2002 SCC 86, refd to. [para. 98]. R. v. Hamelin (E.O.) (2001), 297 A.R. 201; 2001 ABQB 742, refd to. [para. Statutes Noticed: Youth Criminal Justice Act, S.C. 2002, c. 1, sect. 146 [Appendix]. Authors and Works ......
R. v. Tessier (C.V.), (2006) 408 A.R. 305 (PC)
- Canada
- Provincial Court of Alberta (Canada)
- June 30, 2006
...ABPC 211, refd to. [para. 13]. R. v. Ketchum (H.J.) (1999), 260 A.R. 340; 1999 ABPC 157, refd to. [para. 13]. R. v. Hamelin (E.O.) (2001), 297 A.R. 201; 2001 ABQB 742, refd to. [para. R. v. Buffalo (D.A.) (2003), 337 A.R. 120; 2003 ABQB 124, refd to. [para. 13]. R. v. Luong (G.V.) (2000), 2......
R. v. L.T.H., 2008 SCC 49
- Canada
- Supreme Court (Canada)
- September 11, 2008
...[2002] 1 S.C.R. 769, 2002 SCC 23; Chamberlain v. Surrey School District No. 36, [2002] 4 S.C.R. 710, 2002 SCC 86; R. v. Hamelin (2001), 297 A.R. 201, 2001 ABQB 742; Schwartz v. Canada, [1996] 1 S.C.R. 254; Stein v. The Ship “Kathy K”, [1976] 2 S.C.R. Statutes and Regulations Cited Canadian ......

Request a trial to view additional results

1 books & journal articles

Enhancing the enhancements? Section 146 of the Youth Criminal Justice Act and the Supreme Court of Canada: a comment on R. v. L.T.H.
- Canada
- Ottawa Law Review Vol. 40 No. 2, March 2009
- March 22, 2009
...Ibid. at para. 98. See Dagenais v. Canadian Broadcasting Corp., [1994] 3 S.C.R. 835 at 877, 120 D.L.R. (4th) 12. He cites R. v. Hamelin. 2001 ABQB 742, 297 A.R. 201 at paras. 69-72 as jurisprudence directly recognizing that the standard applicable for waiver of the right to counsel is one o......

R. v. Hamelin (E.O.), (2001) 297 A.R. 201 (QB)

You can sign up for a trial and make the most of our service including these benefits.

Why Sign-up to vLex?

Over 100 Countries

Thousands of Data Sources

Find What You Need, Quickly

Over 2 million registered users

You can sign up for a trial and make the most of our service including these benefits.

Why Sign-up to vLex?

Over 100 Countries

Thousands of Data Sources

Find What You Need, Quickly

Over 2 million registered users

You can sign up for a trial and make the most of our service including these benefits.

Why Sign-up to vLex?

Over 100 Countries

Thousands of Data Sources

Find What You Need, Quickly

Over 2 million registered users

You can sign up for a trial and make the most of our service including these benefits.

Why Sign-up to vLex?

Over 100 Countries

Thousands of Data Sources

Find What You Need, Quickly

Over 2 million registered users

You can sign up for a trial and make the most of our service including these benefits.

Why Sign-up to vLex?

Over 100 Countries

Thousands of Data Sources

Find What You Need, Quickly

Over 2 million registered users

Why Sign-up to vLex?

Over 100 Countries

Thousands of Data Sources

Find What You Need, Quickly

Over 2 million registered users

You can sign up for a trial and make the most of our service including these benefits.

Why Sign-up to vLex?

Over 100 Countries

Thousands of Data Sources

Find What You Need, Quickly

Over 2 million registered users