R. v. Hamelin (S.B.), (2010) 496 A.R. 1 (QB)

JudgeGraesser, J.
CourtCourt of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
Citation(2010), 496 A.R. 1 (QB),2010 ABQB 807,2010 ABQB 529
Date12 August 2010
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
1 practice notes
  • R. v. Legrande (R.H.) et al., (2011) 527 A.R. 260 (QB)
    • Canada
    • Provincial Court of Alberta (Canada)
    • October 7, 2011
    ...203; 2007 ABCA 206, leave to appeal denied (2008), 385 N.R. 392; 385 N.R. 393 (S.C.C.), consd. [para. 70]. R. v. Hamelin (S.B.) (2010), 496 A.R. 1 (Q.B.), refd to. [para. 70]. R. v. Sutherland, [1980] 2 S.C.R. 451; 35 N.R. 361; 7 Man.R.(2d) 359, refd to. [para. 73]. R. v. Moosehunter, [1981......
1 cases
  • R. v. Legrande (R.H.) et al., (2011) 527 A.R. 260 (QB)
    • Canada
    • Provincial Court of Alberta (Canada)
    • October 7, 2011
    ...203; 2007 ABCA 206, leave to appeal denied (2008), 385 N.R. 392; 385 N.R. 393 (S.C.C.), consd. [para. 70]. R. v. Hamelin (S.B.) (2010), 496 A.R. 1 (Q.B.), refd to. [para. 70]. R. v. Sutherland, [1980] 2 S.C.R. 451; 35 N.R. 361; 7 Man.R.(2d) 359, refd to. [para. 73]. R. v. Moosehunter, [1981......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT