R. v. Hannan

JurisdictionNova Scotia
CourtCourt of Appeal of Nova Scotia (Canada)
JudgeBeaton,Beveridge,Bryson
Citation2023 NSCA 7
Date02 February 2023
Docket NumberCAC 483896

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
3 practice notes
  • R. v. Chambers
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal of Nova Scotia (Canada)
    • April 27, 2023
    ...Unreasonable verdict   Cases Considered: R. v. W.(D.), [1991] 1 SCR 742; Palmer v. The Queen, [1980] 1 S.C.R. 759; R. v. Hannan, 2023 NSCA 7; R. v. Sinclair, 2011 SCC 40; R. v. Delorey, 2010 NSCA 65; and Rouse v. Her Majesty the Queen, 2020 NSCA   Summary: The appellant did not ma......
  • R v Bilodeau
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • May 6, 2024
    ...for a dangerous purpose, it is one factor that can properly be considered: Kerr at para 37 (per Bastarache and Major JJ); R v Hannan, 2023 NSCA 7 at para 146. Therefore, the trial judge cannot be said to have erred by leaving it open to the jury to consider evidence of the shooting in asses......
  • R v Massicotte
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • March 13, 2024
    ...Mr. Maclean would not survive his injuries.” It was based on this evidence that he made his finding. [Emphasis added.] 130 R. v. Hannan, 2023 NSCA 7 [ Hannan], was an appeal of a second-degree murder conviction in the context of an assault of a single victim by two accused. The victim died ......
3 cases
  • R. v. Chambers
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal of Nova Scotia (Canada)
    • April 27, 2023
    ...Unreasonable verdict   Cases Considered: R. v. W.(D.), [1991] 1 SCR 742; Palmer v. The Queen, [1980] 1 S.C.R. 759; R. v. Hannan, 2023 NSCA 7; R. v. Sinclair, 2011 SCC 40; R. v. Delorey, 2010 NSCA 65; and Rouse v. Her Majesty the Queen, 2020 NSCA   Summary: The appellant did not ma......
  • R v Bilodeau
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • May 6, 2024
    ...for a dangerous purpose, it is one factor that can properly be considered: Kerr at para 37 (per Bastarache and Major JJ); R v Hannan, 2023 NSCA 7 at para 146. Therefore, the trial judge cannot be said to have erred by leaving it open to the jury to consider evidence of the shooting in asses......
  • R v Massicotte
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • March 13, 2024
    ...Mr. Maclean would not survive his injuries.” It was based on this evidence that he made his finding. [Emphasis added.] 130 R. v. Hannan, 2023 NSCA 7 [ Hannan], was an appeal of a second-degree murder conviction in the context of an assault of a single victim by two accused. The victim died ......