R v Harkes, 2017 ABCA 229

JudgeThe Honourable Madam Justice Marina Paperny,The Honourable Mr. Justice Brian O’Ferrall,The Honourable Madam Justice Barbara Lea Veldhuis
Docket Number1501-0262-A
CourtCourt of Appeal (Alberta)
Date05 July 2017
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
8 practice notes
  • Licence to Khill: What Appellate Decisions Reveal About Canada's New Self-Defence Law.
    • Canada
    • Queen's Law Journal Vol. 46 No. 1, September 2020
    • September 22, 2020
    ...supra note 28; R v Phillips, supra note 34; R v Berry, 2017 ONCA 17; R v Cormier, supra note 23; R v Jerrett, supra note 28; R v Harkes, 2017 ABCA 229; R v Rasberry, supra note 28; R v Power, 2016 SKCA 29; R v Kraljevic, supra note (82.) See R v Khill, supra note 8; R v Curran, supra note 2......
  • R v Sikora,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • April 19, 2023
    ...Liability: Manslaughter [131]       In R v Harkes, 2017 ABCA 229, the Court set out the elements for a common intention party to an offence and the mens rea required for being a party to murder under s. 21(2) of the Criminal Code and the mens rea for manslaught......
  • R v Sikora,
    • Canada
    • Court of King's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • April 19, 2023
    ...However, Mr. Sikora may be guilty of manslaughter which I will examine next. iii. Party Liability: Manslaughter 131 In R v Harkes, 2017 ABCA 229, the Court set out the elements for a common intention party to an offence and the mens rea required for being a party to murder under s. 21(2) of......
  • 2023 ABKB 226,
    • Canada
    • January 1, 2023
    ...However, Mr. Sikora may be guilty of manslaughter which I will examine next. iii. Party Liability: Manslaughter 131 In R v Harkes, 2017 ABCA 229, the Court set out the elements for a common intention party to an offence and the mens rea required for being a party to murder under s. 21(2) of......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
7 cases
  • R v Sikora,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • April 19, 2023
    ...Liability: Manslaughter [131]       In R v Harkes, 2017 ABCA 229, the Court set out the elements for a common intention party to an offence and the mens rea required for being a party to murder under s. 21(2) of the Criminal Code and the mens rea for manslaught......
  • R v Sikora,
    • Canada
    • Court of King's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • April 19, 2023
    ...However, Mr. Sikora may be guilty of manslaughter which I will examine next. iii. Party Liability: Manslaughter 131 In R v Harkes, 2017 ABCA 229, the Court set out the elements for a common intention party to an offence and the mens rea required for being a party to murder under s. 21(2) of......
  • 2023 ABKB 226,
    • Canada
    • January 1, 2023
    ...However, Mr. Sikora may be guilty of manslaughter which I will examine next. iii. Party Liability: Manslaughter 131 In R v Harkes, 2017 ABCA 229, the Court set out the elements for a common intention party to an offence and the mens rea required for being a party to murder under s. 21(2) of......
  • R v Whitebear,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • April 12, 2019
    ...a party to murder under subsection 21(1) or subsection 21(2) of the Criminal Code (R v Sit, [1991] 3 SCR 124, 1991 CanLII 34; R v Harkes, 2017 ABCA 229). [68]           In contrast, if the Crown proves in relation to the alleged party to the......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • Licence to Khill: What Appellate Decisions Reveal About Canada's New Self-Defence Law.
    • Canada
    • Queen's Law Journal Vol. 46 No. 1, September 2020
    • September 22, 2020
    ...supra note 28; R v Phillips, supra note 34; R v Berry, 2017 ONCA 17; R v Cormier, supra note 23; R v Jerrett, supra note 28; R v Harkes, 2017 ABCA 229; R v Rasberry, supra note 28; R v Power, 2016 SKCA 29; R v Kraljevic, supra note (82.) See R v Khill, supra note 8; R v Curran, supra note 2......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT