R. v. Harper, (1980) 34 N.R. 359 (SCC)
Judge | Laskin, C.J.C., Ritchie, Dickson, Estey, McIntyre, Chouinard and Lamer, JJ. |
Court | Supreme Court (Canada) |
Case Date | December 08, 1980 |
Jurisdiction | Canada (Federal) |
Citations | (1980), 34 N.R. 359 (SCC) |
R. v. Harper (1980), 34 N.R. 359 (SCC)
MLB headnote and full text
R. v. Harper
Indexed As: R. v. Harper
Supreme Court of Canada
Laskin, C.J.C., Ritchie, Dickson, Estey, McIntyre, Chouinard and Lamer, JJ.
December 8, 1980.
Summary:
This case arose out of a charge of murder. The accused was convicted by a judge and jury. The accused appealed to the Manitoba Court of Appeal.
The Manitoba Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal - see 2 Man.R.(2d) 153. The accused appealed to the Supreme Court of Canada.
The Supreme Court of Canada allowed the appeal, set aside the judgment of the Manitoba Court of Appeal, quashed the conviction and ordered a new trial.
Criminal Law - Topic 5332
Evidence - Confessions and voluntary statements - Voir dire, necessity of - Charge of murder - The Supreme Court of Canada ordered a new trial because of the failure of the trial court to hold a voir dire respecting a statement allegedly made by the accused to a police officer.
Cases Noticed:
Erven v. The Queen, 25 N.R. 49; 30 N.S.R.(2d) 89; 49 A.P.R. 89; [1979] 1 S.C.R. 926, folld. [paras. 1 and 4].
Counsel:
Hersh Wolch and Heather Leonoff, for the appellant;
J.G.B. Dangerfield, Q.C., and S.J. Whitely, for the respondent.
This appeal was heard by LASKIN, C.J.C., RITCHIE, DICKSON, ESTEY, McINTYRE, CHOUINARD and LAMER, JJ., of the Supreme Court of Canada.
The judgment of the Supreme Court of Canada was delivered orally by LASKIN, C.J.C., on December 8, 1980.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Stevens v. Crawford et al., 2001 ABCA 195
...Hospital. Woelk v. Halvorson, [1980] 2 S.C.R. 430; 33 N.R. 232; 24 A.R. 620, refd to. [para. 54]. R. v. Harper, [1982] 1 S.C.R. 12; 34 N.R. 359; 133 D.L.R.(3d) 546, refd to. [para. Dorval v. Bouvier, [1968] S.C.R. 288, refd to. [para. 60]. Maryland Casualty Co. v. Roland Roy Fourrures Inc.,......
-
R. v. R.M.C. and F.D.M., (1988) 53 Man.R.(2d) 297 (CA)
...35 C.C.C.(2d) 337, refd to. [para. 3]. R. v. Erven (1978), 25 N.R. 49; 44 C.C.C.(2d) 76 (S.C.C.), refd to. [para. 5]. R. v. Harper (1981), 34 N.R. 359 (S.C.C.), refd to. [para. R. v. Rothman (1981), 35 N.R. 485; 59 C.C.C.(2d) 30 (S.C.C.), refd to. [para. 7]. R. v. Abbey (1982), 43 N.R. 30; ......
-
R. v. B.N., (2002) 162 O.A.C. 396 (CA)
...the evidence of the witness he may have come to a different conclusion on the issue of self-defence. Cases Noticed: R. v. Harper (1982), 34 N.R. 359; 65 C.C.C.(2d) 193 (S.C.C.), refd to. [para. Carol Ann Bauman, for the respondent; Carolyne Kerr, for the appellant. This appeal was heard on ......
-
R. v. Lamberton (J.W.), (1992) 20 B.C.A.C. 194 (CA)
...99 C.C.C. 345 (B.C.C.A.), refd to. [para. 11]. R. v. Sugiyama (1976), 38 C.R.N.S. 92 (B.C.C.A.), refd to. [para. 11]. R. v. Harper (1982), 34 N.R. 359; 65 C.C.C.(2d) 193 (S.C.C.), refd to. [para. Statutes Noticed: Criminal Code, R.S.C. 1985, c. C-46, sect. 253(a) [para. 1]; sect. 830(1) [pa......
-
Stevens v. Crawford et al., 2001 ABCA 195
...Hospital. Woelk v. Halvorson, [1980] 2 S.C.R. 430; 33 N.R. 232; 24 A.R. 620, refd to. [para. 54]. R. v. Harper, [1982] 1 S.C.R. 12; 34 N.R. 359; 133 D.L.R.(3d) 546, refd to. [para. Dorval v. Bouvier, [1968] S.C.R. 288, refd to. [para. 60]. Maryland Casualty Co. v. Roland Roy Fourrures Inc.,......
-
R. v. R.M.C. and F.D.M., (1988) 53 Man.R.(2d) 297 (CA)
...35 C.C.C.(2d) 337, refd to. [para. 3]. R. v. Erven (1978), 25 N.R. 49; 44 C.C.C.(2d) 76 (S.C.C.), refd to. [para. 5]. R. v. Harper (1981), 34 N.R. 359 (S.C.C.), refd to. [para. R. v. Rothman (1981), 35 N.R. 485; 59 C.C.C.(2d) 30 (S.C.C.), refd to. [para. 7]. R. v. Abbey (1982), 43 N.R. 30; ......
-
R. v. B.N., (2002) 162 O.A.C. 396 (CA)
...the evidence of the witness he may have come to a different conclusion on the issue of self-defence. Cases Noticed: R. v. Harper (1982), 34 N.R. 359; 65 C.C.C.(2d) 193 (S.C.C.), refd to. [para. Carol Ann Bauman, for the respondent; Carolyne Kerr, for the appellant. This appeal was heard on ......
-
R. v. Lamberton (J.W.), (1992) 20 B.C.A.C. 194 (CA)
...99 C.C.C. 345 (B.C.C.A.), refd to. [para. 11]. R. v. Sugiyama (1976), 38 C.R.N.S. 92 (B.C.C.A.), refd to. [para. 11]. R. v. Harper (1982), 34 N.R. 359; 65 C.C.C.(2d) 193 (S.C.C.), refd to. [para. Statutes Noticed: Criminal Code, R.S.C. 1985, c. C-46, sect. 253(a) [para. 1]; sect. 830(1) [pa......