R. v. Harrower
| Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
| Court | Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada) |
| Judge | Honourable Mr. Justice Crabtree |
| Neutral Citation | 2021 BCSC 1796 |
| Citation | 2021 BCSC 1796 |
| Date | 11 June 2021 |
| Docket Number | 65525-2 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
3 cases
-
R v Otchere
...dial-a-dope offences in support of his position (for example, R. v. Lawson, 2022 BCSC 2035; R. v. Gibb, 2022 BCSC 1853; R. v. Harrower, 2021 BCSC 1796; and R. v. Aeichele, 2022 BCSC 195). While he did not dispute that he participated in the dial-a-dope offence witnessed by police that day, ......
-
R v Cooke
...a custodial sentence of nine months. 29 Mr. Otchere cites R. v. Lawson, 2022 BCSC 2035; R. v. Gibb, 2022 BCSC 1853; R. v. Harrower, 2021 BCSC 1796; R. v. Aeichele, 2022 BCSC 195; R. v. Kirk, 2023 BCSC 301 and R. v. Sehn, 2021 BCSC 2292 in support of his argument that this is an appropriate ......
-
R v Gallant
...house arrest may nevertheless be a mitigating factor in imposing sentence: see R. v. Tse, 2010 BCSC 1273 at paras. 14–22; R. v. Harrower, 2021 BCSC 1796 at paras. 70 In terms of how this mitigating factor might affect the overall sentence, Justice Davies in Tse explained as follows, quoting......
