R. v. Hawkins (D.W.), 2005 BCSC 247

JudgeRomilly, J.
CourtSupreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
Case DateFebruary 22, 2005
JurisdictionBritish Columbia
Citations2005 BCSC 247;[2005] B.C.T.C. 247 (SC)

R. v. Hawkins (D.W.), [2005] B.C.T.C. 247 (SC)

MLB headnote and full text

Temp. Cite: [2005] B.C.T.C. TBEd. AP.029

Her Majesty The Queen v. David Wayne Hawkins

(75271-2; 2005 BCSC 247)

Indexed As: R. v. Hawkins (D.W.)

British Columbia Supreme Court

Kamloops

Romilly, J.

February 23, 2005.

Summary:

This headnote contains no summary.

Criminal Law - Topic 5834.7

Sentencing - Considerations on imposing sentence - Mental illness - See paragraphs 1 to 37.

Criminal Law - Topic 5848.2

Sentencing - Considerations on imposing sentence - Time already served (incl. bail) - See paragraphs 1 to 37.

Criminal Law - Topic 5895

Sentencing - Sentence - Particular offences - Threats - See paragraphs 1 to 37.

Criminal Law - Topic 5969

Sentencing - Sentence - Particular offences - Criminal harassment - See paragraphs 1 to 37.

Cases Noticed:

R. v. Hawkins, 2002 BCPC 590, refd to. [para. 8].

R. v. Hynes (K.) (1991), 89 Nfld. & P.E.I.R. 316; 278 A.P.R. 316; 64 C.C.C.(3d) 421 (Nfld. C.A.), refd to. [para. 11].

R. v. Keefe (1978), 44 C.C.C.(2d) 193 (Ont. C.A.), refd to. [para. 11].

R. v. Michael B. (1987), 22 O.A.C. 100; 36 C.C.C.(3d) 573 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 11].

R. v. M.B. - see R. v. Michael B.

R. v. Robinson (1974), 19 C.C.C.(2d) 193 (Ont. C.A.), refd to. [para. 11].

R. v. Payed (C.M.) (1999), 177 Nfld. & P.E.I.R. 289; 543 A.P.R. 289 (Nfld. T.D.), refd to. [para. 15].

R. v. Wust (L.W.), [2000] 1 S.C.R. 455; 252 N.R. 332; 134 B.C.A.C. 236; 219 W.A.C. 236; 143 C.C.C.(3d) 129, refd to. [para. 17].

R. v. Ubhi (J.S.) (1996), 77 B.C.A.C. 19; 126 W.A.C. 19; 109 C.C.C.(3d) 379 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 17].

R. v. LaPierre (1998), 123 C.C.C.(3d) 332 (Que. C.A.), refd to. [para. 17].

R. v. Regan et al. (1975), 24 C.C.C.(2d) 225 (Alta. C.A.), refd to. [para. 17].

R. v. Meilleur (1981), 22 C.R.(3d) 185 (Ont. C.A.), refd to. [para. 17].

R. v. Chiechie (1983), 21 Man.R.(2d) 211; 21 M.V.R. 221 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 17].

R. v. Tallman, Laboucan and Auger (1989), 94 A.R. 251; 48 C.C.C.(3d) 81 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 17].

R. v. Fuentes (R.) (1994), 51 B.C.A.C. 164; 84 W.A.C. 164 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 17].

R. v. Mills (D.J.) (1999), 119 B.C.A.C. 284; 194 W.A.C. 284; 133 C.C.C.(3d) 451 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 17].

R. v. Rezaie (M.) (1996), 96 O.A.C. 268; 112 C.C.C.(3d) 97 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 17].

R. v. McDonald (C.) (1998), 111 O.A.C. 25; 127 C.C.C.(3d) 57 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 17].

R. v. Warren (G.) (1999), 127 O.A.C. 193 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 19].

R. v. C.A.M., [1996] 1 S.C.R. 500; 194 N.R. 321; 73 B.C.A.C. 81; 120 W.A.C. 81; 105 C.C.C.(3d) 327; 46 C.R.(4th) 269, refd to. [para. 19].

R. v. Vermette (I.M.) (2001), 156 Man.R.(2d) 120; 246 W.A.C. 120; 154 C.C.C.(3d) 193 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 19].

R. v. Pangman - see R. v. Vermette (I.M.).

R. v. Morrisey (M.L.) (2000), 259 N.R. 95; 187 N.S.R.(2d) 1; 585 A.P.R. 1; 148 C.C.C.(3d) 1, refd to. [para. 22].

R. v. Stone (B.T.), [1999] 2 S.C.R. 290; 239 N.R. 201; 123 B.C.A.C. 1; 201 W.A.C. 1; 173 D.L.R.(4th) 66; 134 C.C.C.(3d) 353, refd to. [para. 24].

R. v. Wall (P.J.) (1995), 136 Nfld. & P.E.I.R. 200; 423 A.P.R. 200 (P.E.I.C.A.), refd to. [para. 25].

R. v. Bates (D.R.) (2000), 134 O.A.C. 156; 146 C.C.C.(3d) 321 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 26].

R. v. Gilkes (A.D.) (2001), 156 Man.R.(2d) 114; 246 W.A.C. 114; 2001 MBCA 69, refd to. [para. 29].

R. v. Bailey (R.P.) (1998), 162 Nfld. & P.E.I.R. 191; 500 A.P.R. 191 (Nfld. C.A.), refd to. [para. 30].

R. v. Whittle (A.) (1995), 133 Nfld. & P.E.I.R. 181; 413 A.P.R. 181 (Nfld. T.D.), refd to. [para. 30].

R. v. Perrier (P.) (1999), 177 Nfld. & P.E.I.R. 225; 543 A.P.R. 225 (Nfld. T.D.), refd to. [para. 30].

R. v. Meehan (W.G.) (1998), 158 Nfld. & P.E.I.R. 217; 490 A.P.R. 217 (Nfld. T.D.), refd to. [para. 30].

R. v. Simms, [2002] N.J. No. 3 (Prov. Ct.), refd to. [para. 30].

R. v. Basha (N.W.) (2002), 221 Nfld. & P.E.I.R. 315; 661 A.P.R. 315 (N.L.T.D.), refd to. [para 30].

R. v. Thomas (M.D.) (2001), 146 O.A.C. 298 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 30].

R. v. Shawdover (P.A.) (2001), 155 B.C.A.C. 270; 254 W.A.C. 270; 2001 BCCA 377, refd to. [para. 30].

R. v. Waiting (D.J.) (2000), 261 A.R. 334; 225 W.A.C. 334; 2000 ABCA 208, refd to. [para. 30].

R. v. Prelosnjak, [2001] O.T.C. Uned. 957 (Sup. Ct.), refd to. [para. 30].

R. v. Cowell (R.E.) (2001), 153 B.C.A.C. 45; 251 W.A.C. 45; 2001 BCCA 158, refd to. [para. 30].

R. v. Krushel (M.) et al. (2000), 130 O.A.C. 160; 142 C.C.C.(3d) 1 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 30].

Counsel:

J. Carpenter, for the Crown;

S. Tate, for the accused.

This matter was heard on February 22, 2005, before Romilly, J., of the British Columbia Supreme Court, who delivered the following decision on February 23, 2005.

Please note: The following judgment has not been edited.

To continue reading

Request your trial
10 practice notes
  • R. v. Blackwell (M.J.), 2007 BCSC 1762
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 6 Diciembre 2007
    ...R. v. Calder Berg , 2007 BCCA 343; R. v. Evans , 2007 BCCA 426; R. v. Greaves , 2007 BCCA 430; and R. v. Hawkins , 2007 BCCA 487, aff'g 2005 BCSC 247. [45] Relevant factors that might support a denial of two-for-one credit for pre-sentence custody were identified by the trial judge in Hawki......
  • R. v. Leasak (G.M.),
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • 2 Febrero 2007
    ...33]. R. v. Davis (A.A.) (1999), 138 Man.R.(2d) 71; 202 W.A.C. 71 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 35]. R. v. Hawkins (D.W.), [2005] B.C.T.C. 247; 2005 BCSC 247, refd to. [para. 37]. R. v. Hawkins (D.W.) (2006), 233 B.C.A.C. 7; 386 W.A.C. 7; 2006 BCCA 498 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 37]. R. v. Rowe (R.) ......
  • R. v. Moore (J.S.), 2006 BCCA 377
    • Canada
    • British Columbia Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • 15 Agosto 2006
    ...to. [para. 21]. R. v. Finnessey (J.S.) (2000), 135 O.A.C. 396 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 21]. R. v. Hawkins (D.W.), [2005] B.C.T.C. 247; 2005 BCSC 247, refd to. [para. R. v. Khemhus (R.F.) (1994), 54 B.C.A.C. 158; 88 W.A.C. 158 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 21]. Counsel: R.C. Peck, Q.C., for the app......
  • R. v. Taylor (T.A.S.), 2012 BCSC 2209
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 26 Julio 2012
    ...five-year range. [54] In support of its proposed range of sentence, the Crown relies upon the following case authorities: R. v. D.W.H. , 2005 BCSC 247, affirmed 2007 BCCA 487; R. v. O'Connor, 2008 ONCA 206; and R. v. Q.C. , 2012 BCSC 904. Position of the Offender [55] On the basis that......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
10 cases
  • R. v. Blackwell (M.J.), 2007 BCSC 1762
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 6 Diciembre 2007
    ...R. v. Calder Berg , 2007 BCCA 343; R. v. Evans , 2007 BCCA 426; R. v. Greaves , 2007 BCCA 430; and R. v. Hawkins , 2007 BCCA 487, aff'g 2005 BCSC 247. [45] Relevant factors that might support a denial of two-for-one credit for pre-sentence custody were identified by the trial judge in Hawki......
  • R. v. Leasak (G.M.),
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • 2 Febrero 2007
    ...33]. R. v. Davis (A.A.) (1999), 138 Man.R.(2d) 71; 202 W.A.C. 71 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 35]. R. v. Hawkins (D.W.), [2005] B.C.T.C. 247; 2005 BCSC 247, refd to. [para. 37]. R. v. Hawkins (D.W.) (2006), 233 B.C.A.C. 7; 386 W.A.C. 7; 2006 BCCA 498 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 37]. R. v. Rowe (R.) ......
  • R. v. Moore (J.S.), 2006 BCCA 377
    • Canada
    • British Columbia Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • 15 Agosto 2006
    ...to. [para. 21]. R. v. Finnessey (J.S.) (2000), 135 O.A.C. 396 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 21]. R. v. Hawkins (D.W.), [2005] B.C.T.C. 247; 2005 BCSC 247, refd to. [para. R. v. Khemhus (R.F.) (1994), 54 B.C.A.C. 158; 88 W.A.C. 158 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 21]. Counsel: R.C. Peck, Q.C., for the app......
  • R. v. Taylor (T.A.S.), 2012 BCSC 2209
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 26 Julio 2012
    ...five-year range. [54] In support of its proposed range of sentence, the Crown relies upon the following case authorities: R. v. D.W.H. , 2005 BCSC 247, affirmed 2007 BCCA 487; R. v. O'Connor, 2008 ONCA 206; and R. v. Q.C. , 2012 BCSC 904. Position of the Offender [55] On the basis that......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT