R. v. Hudec (K.), 2016 SKPC 16
| Judge | Kalmakoff, P.C.J. |
| Court | Provincial Court of Saskatchewan (Canada) |
| Case Date | February 16, 2016 |
| Jurisdiction | Saskatchewan |
| Citations | 2016 SKPC 16 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
5 practice notes
-
R v Rhode, 2019 SKCA 17
...economic, and sexual status of children. It preys on pre-existing inequalities. [60] Judge Kalmakoff (as he then was) in R v Hudec, 2016 SKPC 16, addressed circumstances very similar to those of Mr. Rhode and also found that, even if there were no risk of the offender committing “contact” o......
-
R. v. Millie,
...I consider the following cases to be instructive in the parity analysis: R v Hudec, 2016 SKPC 16; R v S.D.P., 2012 SKQB 330, 403 Sask R 145; R v Rhode, 2019 SKCA 17, 372 CCC (3d) 442; and R v Winsley, 2019 SKQB 218. f) Restraint and totality [......
-
R. v. Winsley, 2019 SKQB 218
...separately from the appropriate length of the LTSO. In that regard, see R v L.M., 2008 SCC 31, [2008] 2 SCR 163 [L.M.], and R v Hudec, 2016 SKPC 16. [103] At paragraphs 46 to 48 of L.M., the Supreme Court [46] These two types of decisions can be distinguished on the basis of the objectives ......
-
R. v. MACDONALD, 2018 SKQB 18
...seeking out of treatment and counselling post-charge. [22] Crown counsel provided the following cases to the court: 1. R v Hudec, 2016 SKPC 16 2. R v Stupnikoff, 2013 SKPC 57, 416 Sask R 307 3. R v McLean, 2016 SKCA 93, 484 Sask R 137 4. R v Burke, 2016 SKCA 100, 484 Sask R 224 5. Kroeker 6......
Request a trial to view additional results
5 cases
-
R v Rhode, 2019 SKCA 17
...economic, and sexual status of children. It preys on pre-existing inequalities. [60] Judge Kalmakoff (as he then was) in R v Hudec, 2016 SKPC 16, addressed circumstances very similar to those of Mr. Rhode and also found that, even if there were no risk of the offender committing “contact” o......
-
R. v. Millie,
...I consider the following cases to be instructive in the parity analysis: R v Hudec, 2016 SKPC 16; R v S.D.P., 2012 SKQB 330, 403 Sask R 145; R v Rhode, 2019 SKCA 17, 372 CCC (3d) 442; and R v Winsley, 2019 SKQB 218. f) Restraint and totality [......
-
R. v. Winsley, 2019 SKQB 218
...separately from the appropriate length of the LTSO. In that regard, see R v L.M., 2008 SCC 31, [2008] 2 SCR 163 [L.M.], and R v Hudec, 2016 SKPC 16. [103] At paragraphs 46 to 48 of L.M., the Supreme Court [46] These two types of decisions can be distinguished on the basis of the objectives ......
-
R. v. MACDONALD, 2018 SKQB 18
...seeking out of treatment and counselling post-charge. [22] Crown counsel provided the following cases to the court: 1. R v Hudec, 2016 SKPC 16 2. R v Stupnikoff, 2013 SKPC 57, 416 Sask R 307 3. R v McLean, 2016 SKCA 93, 484 Sask R 137 4. R v Burke, 2016 SKCA 100, 484 Sask R 224 5. Kroeker 6......
Request a trial to view additional results