R. v. Hudson
| Jurisdiction | Ontario |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Ontario) |
| Judge | Doherty, Watt, van Rensburg, Benotto and Nordheimer JJ.A. |
| Neutral Citation | 2021 ONCA 772 |
| Citation | 2021 ONCA 772 |
| Docket Number | C65962 |
| Date | 02 November 2021 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
20 practice notes
-
Practical and Ethical Considerations in Witness Preparation
...and outstanding charges: R v Pascal , 2020 ONCA 287 at paras 108-10. 58 R v Corbett , [1988] 1 SCR 670, 1988 CanLII 80. 59 R v Hudson , 2021 ONCA 772 at para 159. 60 It is inappropriate to question an accused person about not having called a witness who might support their version of events......
-
Table of Cases
...CA) .......................... 300 HSB , R v , 2008 SCC 52 ....................................................... 263 Hudson , R v , 2021 ONCA 772 ................................................... 23 Huerta , R v , 2020 ONCA 59 ................................................... 249 Igna......
-
R v Buecken
...is to prove its case, lead to a single conclusion of guilt and exclude all reasonable inferences of the accused's innocence: R v Hudson, 2021 ONCA 772 at para 70. In circumstantial cases, the whole may be greater than the parts. The interaction between the elements of the case and the sheer......
-
R v Chung
...is to prove its case, lead to a single conclusion of guilt and exclude all reasonable inferences of the accused's innocence: R v Hudson, 2021 ONCA 772 at para 70. In circumstantial cases, the whole may be greater than the parts. The interaction between the elements of the case and the sheer......
Get Started for Free
7 cases
-
R v Tallcree
...is to prove its case, lead to a single conclusion of guilt and exclude all inferences of the accused’s innocence: R v Hudson, 2021 ONCA 772 at para 70. For the Crown to succeed in a circumstantial case, the existence of each of the bits of circumstantial evidence, considered as a who......
-
R. v. Subramaniam
...by other circumstances, such as propensity or opportunity, to the alleged offence: Grandinetti at paras. 47–49; R. v. Hudson, 2021 ONCA 772 at paras. 188–189, [44]       The evidential burden on the defence is low and does not require th......
Get Started for Free
2 books & journal articles
-
Table of Cases
...CA) .......................... 300 HSB , R v , 2008 SCC 52 ....................................................... 263 Hudson , R v , 2021 ONCA 772 ................................................... 23 Huerta , R v , 2020 ONCA 59 ................................................... 249 Igna......
-
Practical and Ethical Considerations in Witness Preparation
...and outstanding charges: R v Pascal , 2020 ONCA 287 at paras 108-10. 58 R v Corbett , [1988] 1 SCR 670, 1988 CanLII 80. 59 R v Hudson , 2021 ONCA 772 at para 159. 60 It is inappropriate to question an accused person about not having called a witness who might support their version of events......