R. v. Hweld, 2020 NSCA 36
| Jurisdiction | Nova Scotia |
| Judge | The Honourable Justice Duncan R. Beveridge |
| Date | 15 April 2020 |
| Docket Number | CAC 483124 |
| Court | Court of Appeal of Nova Scotia (Canada) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
3 practice notes
-
McLeod v. Law Society of British Columbia,
...The determination of the elements of an offence has long been recognized as a question of law alone: see, for instance, R v Hweld, 2020 NSCA 36 at paras 27–28; R v Boudreault, 2012 SCC 56 at para 8; and, in relation to whether a pleading discloses the essential elements of a cause of......
-
R. v. Marr, 2021 NSCA 17
...consider when deciding whether to grant leave. [see Chatur at ¶19; Im at ¶22] [14] In R. v. Hweld, 2020 NSCA 36, this Court noted a more nuanced approach may be appropriate where it is the accused who wishes to pursue their first appeal—that is......
-
R. v. Stanton,
...Conviction Appeals Court if the SCAC judge is found to have committed a clear error of law (R. v. Sypher, 2021 NSCA 21; R. v. Hweld, 2020 NSCA 36; R. v. Anand, 2020 NSCA 12; R.E.M., para. 47 The Arguments of the Appellant [53] The Appellant argues the SCAC judg......
3 cases
-
McLeod v. Law Society of British Columbia,
...The determination of the elements of an offence has long been recognized as a question of law alone: see, for instance, R v Hweld, 2020 NSCA 36 at paras 27–28; R v Boudreault, 2012 SCC 56 at para 8; and, in relation to whether a pleading discloses the essential elements of a cause of......
-
R. v. Marr, 2021 NSCA 17
...consider when deciding whether to grant leave. [see Chatur at ¶19; Im at ¶22] [14] In R. v. Hweld, 2020 NSCA 36, this Court noted a more nuanced approach may be appropriate where it is the accused who wishes to pursue their first appeal—that is......
-
R. v. Stanton,
...Conviction Appeals Court if the SCAC judge is found to have committed a clear error of law (R. v. Sypher, 2021 NSCA 21; R. v. Hweld, 2020 NSCA 36; R. v. Anand, 2020 NSCA 12; R.E.M., para. 47 The Arguments of the Appellant [53] The Appellant argues the SCAC judg......