R. v. J.F., 2022 SCC 17
| Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
| Court | Supreme Court (Canada) |
| Judge | Wagner, Richard; Moldaver, Michael J.; Karakatsanis, Andromache; Côté, Suzanne; Brown, Russell; Rowe, Malcolm; Martin, Sheilah; Kasirer, Nicholas; Jamal, Mahmud |
| Citation | 2022 SCC 17 |
| Date | 06 May 2022 |
| Docket Number | 39267 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
20 practice notes
-
Table of cases
...235, 236, 486, 490 R v JF, [2013] 1 SCR 565, 2013 SCC 12 ...............................................162, 166, 180 R v JF, 2022 SCC 17 .............................................................................................. 52 R v JFD (2005), 211 BCAC 235, 196 CCC (3d) 316, 2005 BC......
-
The Criminal Law and the Constitution
...its verdict. 175 169 2016 SCC 27. The Court also allowed transitional periods for cases before its decision. 170 Ibid at 48; R v JF , 2022 SCC 17 at 26. 171 Askov , above note 164 (establishing 8–10-month presumptive limits). 172 R v Williamson , 2016 SCC 28, staying charges in an historica......
-
R v Spencer,
...In doing so, he acted in the way the Supreme Court has suggested defendants should act in those circumstances (see, for example: R v J.F., 2022 SCC 17 at para 35; and R v K.G.K., 2020 SCC 7 at para 43, 443 DLR (4th) 361). Mr. Spencer also raised his objections to the Crown’s affidavi......
-
Sharafaldin v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 768
...trial: see R v Askov, [1990] 2 SCR 1199 at 1228-29; R v Morin, [1992] 1 SCR 771 at 790; R v Jordan, 2016 SCC 27 at para 61; and R v JF, 2022 SCC 17 at paras 43-49. Of course, all these cases concern a right guaranteed by the Charter; however, the understanding of waiver on which they draw i......
Request a trial to view additional results
19 cases
-
R v Spencer,
...In doing so, he acted in the way the Supreme Court has suggested defendants should act in those circumstances (see, for example: R v J.F., 2022 SCC 17 at para 35; and R v K.G.K., 2020 SCC 7 at para 43, 443 DLR (4th) 361). Mr. Spencer also raised his objections to the Crown’s affidavi......
-
Sharafaldin v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 768
...trial: see R v Askov, [1990] 2 SCR 1199 at 1228-29; R v Morin, [1992] 1 SCR 771 at 790; R v Jordan, 2016 SCC 27 at para 61; and R v JF, 2022 SCC 17 at paras 43-49. Of course, all these cases concern a right guaranteed by the Charter; however, the understanding of waiver on which they draw i......
-
R. v. Donnelly,
...Jordan, 2016 SCC 27, [2016] 1 S.C.R. 631, at paras. 69-76, 81. [24] The Supreme Court in R. v. J.F., 2022 SCC 17, has recently confirmed that while retrials must be prioritized in scheduling hearings, the same ceilings set in Jordan apply to retrial delay......
-
R v Demetroff,
...In a recent comment on defence’s duty to act, the majority in R v JF, 2022 SCC 17 noted at para 36 that by the time the trial dates are set, the parties are generally in a position to know whether the trial delay will exceed the applicable presumptive ceiling, and the defence can rai......
Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
-
Table of cases
...235, 236, 486, 490 R v JF, [2013] 1 SCR 565, 2013 SCC 12 ...............................................162, 166, 180 R v JF, 2022 SCC 17 .............................................................................................. 52 R v JFD (2005), 211 BCAC 235, 196 CCC (3d) 316, 2005 BC......
-
The Criminal Law and the Constitution
...its verdict. 175 169 2016 SCC 27. The Court also allowed transitional periods for cases before its decision. 170 Ibid at 48; R v JF , 2022 SCC 17 at 26. 171 Askov , above note 164 (establishing 8–10-month presumptive limits). 172 R v Williamson , 2016 SCC 28, staying charges in an historica......