R. v. J.H.,

JurisdictionOntario
JudgeWatt, Huscroft and Jamal JJ.A.
Citation2020 ONCA 165
Docket NumberC65145
CourtCourt of Appeal (Ontario)
Date04 March 2020

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
32 practice notes
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (March 2 – March 6, 2020)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • April 2, 2020
    ...s. 5(3)(a), R. v. Lacasse, 2015 SCC 64, R. v. Wong, 2012 ONCA 767, R. v. Nasogaluak, 2010 SCC 6, R. v. Ghadban, 2015 ONCA 760 R. v. J.H., 2020 ONCA 165 Keywords: Criminal Law, Sexual Assault, Evidence, Admissibility, Prior Bad Conduct, Jury Instructions, Criminal Code, ss. 625.1(2), 645(5),......
  • R. v. Vallee
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • January 13, 2022
    ...for a mistrial have been employed over the years, including that a mistrial is a “last resort”: Muller, Montgomery, and R. v. J.H., 2020 ONCA 165; a mistrial is reserved for the “clearest of cases” where there has been a “fatal wounding” of the trial that cannot be cured by other remedial m......
  • R. v. Berry
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • November 23, 2022
    ...have been employed over the years, including that a mistrial is a “last resort”: Muller, Montgomery, and R. v. J.H., 2020 ONCA 165; a mistrial is reserved for the “clearest of cases” where there has been a “fatal wounding” of the trial that cannot b......
  • R v Stettner
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • September 11, 2024
    ...character as circumstantial proof of their conduct in relation to the present charges ( Handy at para 31; Z.W.C. at para 96; R v J.H., 2020 ONCA 165 at para 53 [ J.H.]; R v Roks, 2011 ONCA 526 at paras 87–89, 274 CCC (3d) 51 As with many other general rules of exclusion, this rule has excep......
  • Get Started for Free
31 cases
  • R. v. Vallee
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • January 13, 2022
    ...for a mistrial have been employed over the years, including that a mistrial is a “last resort”: Muller, Montgomery, and R. v. J.H., 2020 ONCA 165; a mistrial is reserved for the “clearest of cases” where there has been a “fatal wounding” of the trial that cannot be cured by other remedial m......
  • R. v. Berry
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • November 23, 2022
    ...have been employed over the years, including that a mistrial is a “last resort”: Muller, Montgomery, and R. v. J.H., 2020 ONCA 165; a mistrial is reserved for the “clearest of cases” where there has been a “fatal wounding” of the trial that cannot b......
  • R v Stettner
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • September 11, 2024
    ...character as circumstantial proof of their conduct in relation to the present charges ( Handy at para 31; Z.W.C. at para 96; R v J.H., 2020 ONCA 165 at para 53 [ J.H.]; R v Roks, 2011 ONCA 526 at paras 87–89, 274 CCC (3d) 51 As with many other general rules of exclusion, this rule has excep......
  • R. v. Montsion
    • Canada
    • Ontario Court of Justice General Division (Canada)
    • October 20, 2020
    ...(with redactions) from Constable Weir’s SIU Statement, December 16, 2016 [126]R. v. D.K., 2020 ONCA 79 at paras. 34-37, R. v. J.H., 2020 ONCA 165 at paras. 117-121, R. v. G.J.S., 2020 ONCA 317 at paras. [127]Frame 1356, 52 seconds [128]In saying this, I reiterate that the QuickTime counter ......
  • Get Started for Free
1 firm's commentaries
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (March 2 – March 6, 2020)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • April 2, 2020
    ...s. 5(3)(a), R. v. Lacasse, 2015 SCC 64, R. v. Wong, 2012 ONCA 767, R. v. Nasogaluak, 2010 SCC 6, R. v. Ghadban, 2015 ONCA 760 R. v. J.H., 2020 ONCA 165 Keywords: Criminal Law, Sexual Assault, Evidence, Admissibility, Prior Bad Conduct, Jury Instructions, Criminal Code, ss. 625.1(2), 645(5),......