R. v. J.J.L. and F.G., (1991) 114 A.R. 272 (ProvCt)

JudgeRussell, P.C.J.
CourtProvincial Court of Alberta (Canada)
Case DateFebruary 25, 1991
Citations(1991), 114 A.R. 272 (ProvCt)

R. v. J.J.L. (1991), 114 A.R. 272 (ProvCt)

MLB headnote and full text

Her Majesty The Queen (respondent) v. J.J.L. and F.G. (applicants)

Indexed As: R. v. J.J.L. and F.G.

Alberta Provincial Court

Youth Division

Russell, P.C.J.

February 25, 1991.

Summary:

Two youths charged with attempted theft applied under s. 24 of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms for a stay of proceedings on the ground that their right to be tried within a reasonable time (Charter, s. 11(b)) had been denied.

The Alberta Provincial Court, Youth Division, dismissed the application.

Civil Rights - Topic 3265

Trials - Due process, fundamental justice and fair hearings - Speedy trial - Accused's right to - "Within a reasonable time" - What constitutes - Youths charged on September 1, 1990 were in police custody on their trial date (October 9, 1990) - A "judge's order" (Criminal Code, s. 527) was granted to order their expeditious delivery to the court - The youths did not appear that day and the order was undelivered because of failure of the administrative system in place - The trial was adjourned to March 13, 1991, 6.5 months after the charge - The Alberta Provincial Court, Youth Division, stated that the youths' right to be tried within a reasonable time (Charter, s. 11(b)) was not denied - The delay was not excessive, there was no Crown misconduct and no special prejudice to the youths.

Cases Noticed:

R. v. Cardinal (1985), 60 A.R. 156; 21 C.C.C.(3d) 285 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 11].

R. v. Askov, Hussey, Melo and Gugliotta (1990), 113 N.R. 241; 42 O.A.C. 81 (S.C.C.), consd. [para. 11].

R. v. Conway (1989), 96 N.R. 241; 34 O.A.C. 165; 49 C.C.C.(3d) 89 (S.C.C.), refd to. [para. 15].

R. v. MacDonald (1989), 94 N.S.R.(2d) 220; 247 A.P.R. 220 (F.C.), refd to. [para. 30].

R. v. K.W. (1991), 113 A.R. 157 (P.C.), agreed with [para. 34].

Statutes Noticed:

Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, 1982, sect. 11(b), sect. 24.

Criminal Code, R.S.C. 1985, c. C-46, sect. 527 [para. 1].

Counsel:

Angus Boyd, for J.L.L.;

Travis Huckell, for F.G.;

Andrew Fong, for the Crown.

This application was heard before Russell, P.C.J., of the Alberta Provincial Court, Youth Division, who delivered the following judgment on February 25, 1991.

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 practice notes
  • R. v. A.T., (1991) 115 A.R. 193 (PC)
    • Canada
    • Provincial Court of Alberta (Canada)
    • 29 Abril 1991
    ...12]. R. v. G.A.F. - see R. v. Ford. R. v. W.K.L. (1989), 51 C.C.C.(3d) 297 (B.C.C.A.), refd to. [para. 12]. R. v. J.J.L. and F.G. (1991), 114 A.R. 272, refd to. [para. 26]. R. v. K.W. (1991), 113 A.R. 157, refd to. [para. 26]. R. v. J.R.C. (1991), 112 A.R. 394, refd to. [para. 26]. R. v. J.......
  • R. v. B.C., D.F. and R.Y., (1991) 126 A.R. 150 (ProvCt)
    • Canada
    • Provincial Court of Alberta (Canada)
    • 5 Diciembre 1991
    ...1; 66 C.C.C.(3d) 173 (C.A.), consd. [para. 24]. R. v. K.W. (1991), 113 A.R. 157 (Alta. P.C.), consd. [para. 26]. R. v. L. and G. (1991), 114 A.R. 272 (Alta. P.C.), consd. [para. R. v. W.A.W. (1991), 119 A.R. 321; 80 A.L.R.(2d) 406 (Alta. P.C.), consd. [para. 28]. R. v. R.L. (1986), 14 O.A.C......
2 cases
  • R. v. A.T., (1991) 115 A.R. 193 (PC)
    • Canada
    • Provincial Court of Alberta (Canada)
    • 29 Abril 1991
    ...12]. R. v. G.A.F. - see R. v. Ford. R. v. W.K.L. (1989), 51 C.C.C.(3d) 297 (B.C.C.A.), refd to. [para. 12]. R. v. J.J.L. and F.G. (1991), 114 A.R. 272, refd to. [para. 26]. R. v. K.W. (1991), 113 A.R. 157, refd to. [para. 26]. R. v. J.R.C. (1991), 112 A.R. 394, refd to. [para. 26]. R. v. J.......
  • R. v. B.C., D.F. and R.Y., (1991) 126 A.R. 150 (ProvCt)
    • Canada
    • Provincial Court of Alberta (Canada)
    • 5 Diciembre 1991
    ...1; 66 C.C.C.(3d) 173 (C.A.), consd. [para. 24]. R. v. K.W. (1991), 113 A.R. 157 (Alta. P.C.), consd. [para. 26]. R. v. L. and G. (1991), 114 A.R. 272 (Alta. P.C.), consd. [para. R. v. W.A.W. (1991), 119 A.R. 321; 80 A.L.R.(2d) 406 (Alta. P.C.), consd. [para. 28]. R. v. R.L. (1986), 14 O.A.C......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT