R v Jeha, 2019 ABQB 44
| Judge | Honourable Mr. Justice D.A. Labrenz |
| Date | 21 January 2019 |
| Citation | 2019 ABQB 44 |
| Docket Number | 160537627Q1 |
| Court | Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
6 practice notes
-
R v Carter, 2020 ABQB 481
...the court and the Crown are otherwise ready to proceed is counted as delay caused by the conduct of the Defence: Jordan para 64, R v Jeha, 2019 ABQB 44, para 32. However, in cases of multiple accused, delay caused solely by the conduct of a co-accused need not necessarily be visited upon th......
-
R v Demetroff,
...a practice of which the Supreme Court disapproved in Jordan. [30] In R v Jeha, 2019 ABQB 44, aff’d 2020 ABCA 453, leave denied [2021] SCCA No 48, the Court reviewed Ontario jurisprudence including Gopie, and the Alberta case......
-
R v D'Souza,
...exists due to the unavailability of counsel. This “bright line” rule was addressed by Justice Labrenz in R v Jeha, 2019 ABQB 44, paragraph [40] I also agree with the approach taken by Michalyshyn, J., in R v Mul......
-
R v Perdomo,
...Michalyshyn of this Court in R v Mullen, 2018 ABQB 831 at paragraphs 21-46. Justice Labrenz commented on this issue in R v Jeha, 2019 ABQB 44 at paragraphs The approach of the majority in Jordan to defence delay is consistent with the plain word meaning of the majority’s decisi......
Request a trial to view additional results
6 cases
-
R v Carter, 2020 ABQB 481
...the court and the Crown are otherwise ready to proceed is counted as delay caused by the conduct of the Defence: Jordan para 64, R v Jeha, 2019 ABQB 44, para 32. However, in cases of multiple accused, delay caused solely by the conduct of a co-accused need not necessarily be visited upon th......
-
R v Demetroff,
...a practice of which the Supreme Court disapproved in Jordan. [30] In R v Jeha, 2019 ABQB 44, aff’d 2020 ABCA 453, leave denied [2021] SCCA No 48, the Court reviewed Ontario jurisprudence including Gopie, and the Alberta case......
-
R v D'Souza,
...exists due to the unavailability of counsel. This “bright line” rule was addressed by Justice Labrenz in R v Jeha, 2019 ABQB 44, paragraph [40] I also agree with the approach taken by Michalyshyn, J., in R v Mul......
-
R v Perdomo,
...Michalyshyn of this Court in R v Mullen, 2018 ABQB 831 at paragraphs 21-46. Justice Labrenz commented on this issue in R v Jeha, 2019 ABQB 44 at paragraphs The approach of the majority in Jordan to defence delay is consistent with the plain word meaning of the majority’s decisi......
Request a trial to view additional results