R. v. Jiang,

JurisdictionOntario
JudgeHourigan, Pardu and Harvison Young JJ.A.
Citation2018 ONCA 1081
Date27 December 2018
CourtCourt of Appeal (Ontario)
Docket NumberC62742

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
8 practice notes
  • R. v. Vallee,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • January 13, 2022
    ...remedy” or “last resort” or “real danger” standards. At the same time, relying on Ryan, R. v. Arnold, 2001 BCCA 374, and R. v. Jiang, 2018 ONCA 1081, he says the judge in this case should have relied on Dixon and asked whether there is a “reasonable possibility” that the right to a fair tri......
  • Ontario Court Of Appeal Summaries (December 24 – 28, 2018)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • January 7, 2019
    ...2004 CanLII 9527 (Ont. C.A.), Evidence, Admissibility, Hearsay, Prior Inconsistent Statements, Vetrovec Witnesses R. v. Jiang, 2018 ONCA 1081 Keywords: Criminal Law, Second Degree Murder, Mistrials, Non-Disclosure, Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, s. 7, R. v. Dixon, [1998] 1 S.C.R. ......
  • R. v. Sandeson,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal of Nova Scotia (Canada)
    • June 17, 2020
    ...evidence. [Emphasis in original] See also R. v. Aldhelm-White, 2008 NSCA 86, ¶14; R. v. Alcantara, 2013 ABCA 163, ¶27; R. v. Jiang, 2018 ONCA 1081, [65] In R. v. T.S., 2012 ONCA 289, Watt J.A. provided a helpful statement on how to assess the impact of the late disclosure on trial fairness:......
  • R. v. Barra,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Ontario)
    • August 18, 2021
    ...that the failure affected either the outcome of the trial or the overall fairness of the trial process: Dixon, at para. 35; R. v. Jiang, 2018 ONCA 1081, 370 C.C.C. (3d) 373, at para. 4. [142]    A fair trial is a trial that appears fair, not only from the perspective of the a......
  • Get Started for Free
7 cases
  • R. v. Vallee,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • January 13, 2022
    ...remedy” or “last resort” or “real danger” standards. At the same time, relying on Ryan, R. v. Arnold, 2001 BCCA 374, and R. v. Jiang, 2018 ONCA 1081, he says the judge in this case should have relied on Dixon and asked whether there is a “reasonable possibility” that the right to a fair tri......
  • R. v. Sandeson,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal of Nova Scotia (Canada)
    • June 17, 2020
    ...evidence. [Emphasis in original] See also R. v. Aldhelm-White, 2008 NSCA 86, ¶14; R. v. Alcantara, 2013 ABCA 163, ¶27; R. v. Jiang, 2018 ONCA 1081, [65] In R. v. T.S., 2012 ONCA 289, Watt J.A. provided a helpful statement on how to assess the impact of the late disclosure on trial fairness:......
  • R. v. Barra,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Ontario)
    • August 18, 2021
    ...that the failure affected either the outcome of the trial or the overall fairness of the trial process: Dixon, at para. 35; R. v. Jiang, 2018 ONCA 1081, 370 C.C.C. (3d) 373, at para. 4. [142]    A fair trial is a trial that appears fair, not only from the perspective of the a......
  • 2024 ABCJ 60,
    • Canada
    • January 1, 2024
    ...2002 SCC 55, R v. Khan 2001 SCC 86, R v Dixon, [1998] 1 SCR 244 (SCC), R v Skinner [1998] 1 SCR 298 R v Sandeson, 2020 NSCA 47 R v Jiang, 2018 ONCA 1081, R v McKillop, [1996] OJ No 2757 R v Oparah, 2015 ONSC 1585 R v McCune, 1998 CanLII 15035, R v Burgar, 2018 BCCA 291 R v Robinson, 2018 AB......
  • Get Started for Free
1 firm's commentaries
  • Ontario Court Of Appeal Summaries (December 24 – 28, 2018)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • January 7, 2019
    ...2004 CanLII 9527 (Ont. C.A.), Evidence, Admissibility, Hearsay, Prior Inconsistent Statements, Vetrovec Witnesses R. v. Jiang, 2018 ONCA 1081 Keywords: Criminal Law, Second Degree Murder, Mistrials, Non-Disclosure, Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, s. 7, R. v. Dixon, [1998] 1 S.C.R. ......