R v Johannesson

JurisdictionAlberta
CourtCourt of Appeal (Alberta)
JudgeHonourable Mr. Justice Thomas W. Wakeling
Citation2018 ABCA 248
Docket Number1803-0110-A
Date13 July 2018

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
4 practice notes
  • R v Ruiz
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • June 3, 2021
    ...is not to step into the shoes of the summary conviction appeal judge, whose decision is the matter under appeal. In R v Johannesson, 2018 ABCA 248 at footnote 41, 73 Alta LR (6th) 1, citing from Lofstrom ... For leave to be considered, the ground of appeal against the decision of an appeal ......
  • R v Baksza
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • July 17, 2018
    ...D.J. Alford for the Respondent D.R. Hatch for the Applicant [1] R.S.C. 1985, c. C-46. [2] Id. s. 839(1). [3] The Queen v. Johannesson, 2018 ABCA 248, ¶¶67 & 68 (chambers); The Queen v. Steinkey, 2017 ABCA 291, ¶63; 2017 D.T.C. 5109, ¶63 (chambers) & The Queen v. Evans, 2014 ABCA 339......
  • Alberta v. Cherneske
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • April 13, 2026
    ...A proposed appeal is important if an issue of substance arises that has significance to the administration of justice: R v Johannesson, 2018 ABCA 248 at para 15; R v Baker, 2012 MBCA 76 at para 22. [30]        Leave to appeal may be granted even where......
  • R v Sheikh
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • July 13, 2018
    ...for the Applicant [1] R.S.C. 1985, c. C-46. [2] 2005 SCC 72; [2005] 3 S.C.R. 499. [3] 2013 ABPC 124. [4] The Queen v. Johannesson, 2018 ABCA 248, ¶¶67-68 (chambers); The Queen v. Steinkey, 2017 ABCA 291, ¶63; 2017 D.T.C. 5109, ¶63 (chambers) & The Queen v. Evans, 2014 ABCA 339, ¶28; 316......
4 cases
  • R v Ruiz
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • June 3, 2021
    ...is not to step into the shoes of the summary conviction appeal judge, whose decision is the matter under appeal. In R v Johannesson, 2018 ABCA 248 at footnote 41, 73 Alta LR (6th) 1, citing from Lofstrom ... For leave to be considered, the ground of appeal against the decision of an appeal ......
  • R v Baksza
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • July 17, 2018
    ...D.J. Alford for the Respondent D.R. Hatch for the Applicant [1] R.S.C. 1985, c. C-46. [2] Id. s. 839(1). [3] The Queen v. Johannesson, 2018 ABCA 248, ¶¶67 & 68 (chambers); The Queen v. Steinkey, 2017 ABCA 291, ¶63; 2017 D.T.C. 5109, ¶63 (chambers) & The Queen v. Evans, 2014 ABCA 339......
  • Alberta v. Cherneske
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • April 13, 2026
    ...A proposed appeal is important if an issue of substance arises that has significance to the administration of justice: R v Johannesson, 2018 ABCA 248 at para 15; R v Baker, 2012 MBCA 76 at para 22. [30]        Leave to appeal may be granted even where......
  • R v Sheikh
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • July 13, 2018
    ...for the Applicant [1] R.S.C. 1985, c. C-46. [2] 2005 SCC 72; [2005] 3 S.C.R. 499. [3] 2013 ABPC 124. [4] The Queen v. Johannesson, 2018 ABCA 248, ¶¶67-68 (chambers); The Queen v. Steinkey, 2017 ABCA 291, ¶63; 2017 D.T.C. 5109, ¶63 (chambers) & The Queen v. Evans, 2014 ABCA 339, ¶28; 316......