R v JOL, 2020 ABCA 73
| Judge | The Honourable Mr. Justice Peter Costigan,The Honourable Mr. Justice Thomas W. Wakeling,The Honourable Madam Justice Dawn Pentelechuk |
| Citation | 2020 ABCA 73 |
| Docket Number | 1803-0069-A |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Alberta) |
| Date | 21 February 2020 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
7 practice notes
-
R v Way, 2022 ABCA 1
...applies. The entire charge is reviewed and the standard is not one of perfection, but that of a properly instructed jury: R v JOL, 2020 ABCA 73 at paras [12] Lastly, trial fairness issues also raise a question of law, and a perceived apprehension of......
-
R v Khan,
...[35] Trial Transcript 480:8. [36] Trial Transcript 483:30 & 484:9-25. [37] R.S.C. 1985, c. C-46. [38] The Queen v. J.O.L., 2020 ABCA 73, ¶ 15. See The Queen v. Jaw, 2009 SCC 42, ¶ 32; [2009] 3 S.C.R. 26, 44 (“An appellate court must examine the alleged error in the context of the entire......
-
R v Nauya,
...jury or failed to provide an essential direction to the jury is a question of law, subject to the correctness standard of review: R v JOL, 2020 ABCA 73 at para [11] We begin our analysis with the second ground of appeal – that the trial judge failed to instruct the jury on the mens rea for ......
-
R v Thompson,
...wife, threatening “I will ruin your life:” ibid. The Court of Appeal wrote as follows at para 52 of R v JOL, 2020 ABCA 73: [52] We agree the trial judge erred in refusing defence counsel’s request to provide a specific instruction regarding......
Get Started for Free
7 cases
-
R v Way, 2022 ABCA 1
...applies. The entire charge is reviewed and the standard is not one of perfection, but that of a properly instructed jury: R v JOL, 2020 ABCA 73 at paras [12]        Lastly, trial fairness issues also raise a question of law, and a perceived apprehension of......
-
R v Khan
...[35] Trial Transcript 480:8. [36] Trial Transcript 483:30 & 484:9-25. [37] R.S.C. 1985, c. C-46. [38] The Queen v. J.O.L., 2020 ABCA 73, ¶ 15. See The Queen v. Jaw, 2009 SCC 42, ¶ 32; [2009] 3 S.C.R. 26, 44 (“An appellate court must examine the alleged error in the context of the entire......
-
R v Nauya
...jury or failed to provide an essential direction to the jury is a question of law, subject to the correctness standard of review: R v JOL, 2020 ABCA 73 at para [11] We begin our analysis with the second ground of appeal – that the trial judge failed to instruct the jury on the mens rea for ......
-
R v Thompson
...wife, threatening “I will ruin your life:” ibid. The Court of Appeal wrote as follows at para 52 of R v JOL, 2020 ABCA 73: [52]      We agree the trial judge erred in refusing defence counsel’s request to provide a specific instruction regarding......
Get Started for Free