R. v. K.M.E., [2001] B.C.T.C. 470 (SC)
Judge | Morrison, J. |
Court | Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada) |
Case Date | October 02, 2000 |
Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
Citations | [2001] B.C.T.C. 470 (SC);2001 BCSC 470 |
R. v. K.M.E., [2001] B.C.T.C. 470 (SC)
MLB headnote and full text
Temp. Cite: [2001] B.C.T.C. TBEd. JN.024
Her Majesty the Queen v. K.M.E.
(CC981593; 2001 BCSC 470)
Indexed As: R. v. K.M.E.
British Columbia Supreme Court
Vancouver
Morrison, J.
March 30, 2001.
Summary:
This headnote contains no summary.
Courts - Topic 1443
Administration - Documents filed by parties - Public right of access (incl. videotapes) - Public right of access - General - See paragraphs 1 to 50.
Cases Noticed:
Province Newspaper v. British Columbia (1989), 41 B.C.L.R.(2d) 111 (S.C.), refd to. [para. 9].
R. v. Budai (M.K.) et al. (2000), 137 B.C.A.C. 26; 223 W.A.C. 26 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 9].
R. v. UTV et al., [1997] B.C.T.C. Uned. J95 (S.C.), refd to. [para. 9].
MacIntyre v. Nova Scotia (Attorney General) and Grainger and Canada (Attorney General) et al., [1982] 1 S.C.R. 175; 40 N.R. 181; 49 N.S.R.(2d) 609; 96 A.P.R. 609; 65 C.C.C.(2d) 129; 132 D.L.R.(3d) 385, refd to. [para. 9].
Canadian Broadcasting Corp. v. Dagenais et al., [1994] 3 S.C.R. 835; 175 N.R. 1; 76 O.A.C. 81; 94 C.C.C.(3d) 289; 25 C.R.R.(2d) 1; 120 D.L.R.(4th) 12, refd to. [para. 9].
R. v. Caouette (M.A.), [1997] B.C.T.C. Uned. 661 (S.C.), refd to. [para. 9].
R. v. Driver (T.), [1997] B.C.T.C. Uned. J93 (S.C.), refd to. [para. 9].
R. v. Lortie (1985), 21 C.C.C.(3d) 436 (Que. C.A.), refd to. [para. 19].
Vickery v. Prothonotary, Supreme Court (N.S.) (1991), 124 N.R. 95; 104 N.S.R.(2d) 181; 283 A.P.R. 181; 64 C.C.C.(3d) 65 (S.C.C.), refd to. [para. 19].
F.P. Publications (Western) Ltd., Re; R. v. Kerr (1979), 2 Man.R.(2d) 1; 51 C.C.C.(2d) 110 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 26].
Counsel:
Gregory J. Fitch, for the Crown;
Daniel W. Burnett, for the applicants, CHEK Television and CBC;
Mark R. Jette, for K.M.E.
This application was heard on October 2, 2000, before Morrison, J., of the British Columbia Supreme Court, who delivered the following decision on March 30, 2001.
Please note: The following judgment has not been edited.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Canada (Attorney General) v. Almalki et al., (2010) 372 F.T.R. 309 (FC)
...(N.S.), [1991] 1 S.C.R. 671; 124 N.R. 95; 104 N.S.R.(2d) 181; 283 A.P.R. 181, refd to. [para. 20]. R. v. K.M.E., [2001] B.C.T.C. 470; 2001 BCSC 470, refd to. [para. R. v. Canadian Broadcasting Corp., [2006] O.T.C. 405; 208 C.C.C.(3d) 257 (Sup. Ct.), refd to. [para. 20]. R. v. Giles (D.F.) e......
-
R. v. Moazami, 2020 BCCA 350
...(R. v. Pilarinos, 2001 BCSC 1332); televising an inadmissible videotape that was played in open court (Her Majesty the Queen v. Ellard, 2001 BCSC 470); or making copies of exhibits (Panghali at para. 32). Since the materials are in the court’s custody, there is no automatic righ......
-
Canada (Attorney General) v. Almalki et al., (2010) 372 F.T.R. 309 (FC)
...(N.S.), [1991] 1 S.C.R. 671; 124 N.R. 95; 104 N.S.R.(2d) 181; 283 A.P.R. 181, refd to. [para. 20]. R. v. K.M.E., [2001] B.C.T.C. 470; 2001 BCSC 470, refd to. [para. R. v. Canadian Broadcasting Corp., [2006] O.T.C. 405; 208 C.C.C.(3d) 257 (Sup. Ct.), refd to. [para. 20]. R. v. Giles (D.F.) e......
-
R. v. Moazami, 2020 BCCA 350
...(R. v. Pilarinos, 2001 BCSC 1332); televising an inadmissible videotape that was played in open court (Her Majesty the Queen v. Ellard, 2001 BCSC 470); or making copies of exhibits (Panghali at para. 32). Since the materials are in the court’s custody, there is no automatic righ......