R. v. Kaardal

JurisdictionOntario
CourtOntario Court of Justice General Division (Canada)
JudgeMcLeod
Citation2022 ONCJ 441
Date27 September 2022
Docket Number20-38100723

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
5 practice notes
  • R. v. Scott
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • May 19, 2023
    ...features absent here: see R. v. Finn, 2012 YKTC 106; R. v. Brown, 2022 ONCA 516; R. v. Olivetti, 2022 ONCA 142; R. v. Kaardal, 2022 ONCJ 441; R. v. Jenkins, 2021 ONSC 2963; R. v. Taylor, 2019 NBQB 262; Ontario v. G., 2020 SCC 38. Most prominently, the making available cases, in my view, off......
  • R. v. Torres
    • Canada
    • Ontario Court of Justice General Division (Canada)
    • June 2, 2025
    ...ONSC 7017, and R. v. M.M., 2022 ONCA 441 to support his position. The Crown also referred to R. v. Walker, 2021 ONSC 837, R. v. Kaardal, 2022 ONCJ 441, R. v. Jose, 2023 ABCJ 186, R. v. Welter, 2024 O.J. No. 197 (Prov. Ct.), and R. v. S.A.D.F. 2021 MBCA 22, to support his position that a con......
  • R. v. Tcheong
    • Canada
    • Ontario Court of Justice General Division (Canada)
    • May 4, 2023
    ...others. He was sentenced to 20 months imprisonment and two years probation. [44]       In R. v. Kaardal 2022 ONCJ 441, the court considered a case involving 276 images of child pornography. The defendant was 70 years old and had been married for 50 years and ha......
  • R. v. DaSilva
    • Canada
    • Ontario Court of Justice General Division (Canada)
    • January 9, 2025
    ...The nature of the collection was at "the high end of abusive material." [85]        In R. v. Kardaal, 2022 ONCJ 441, just over 13 months was imposed for possessing 276 images and no videos. The offender was elderly and had significant health issues. He was......
  • Get Started for Free
5 cases
  • R. v. Scott
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • May 19, 2023
    ...features absent here: see R. v. Finn, 2012 YKTC 106; R. v. Brown, 2022 ONCA 516; R. v. Olivetti, 2022 ONCA 142; R. v. Kaardal, 2022 ONCJ 441; R. v. Jenkins, 2021 ONSC 2963; R. v. Taylor, 2019 NBQB 262; Ontario v. G., 2020 SCC 38. Most prominently, the making available cases, in my view, off......
  • R. v. Torres
    • Canada
    • Ontario Court of Justice General Division (Canada)
    • June 2, 2025
    ...ONSC 7017, and R. v. M.M., 2022 ONCA 441 to support his position. The Crown also referred to R. v. Walker, 2021 ONSC 837, R. v. Kaardal, 2022 ONCJ 441, R. v. Jose, 2023 ABCJ 186, R. v. Welter, 2024 O.J. No. 197 (Prov. Ct.), and R. v. S.A.D.F. 2021 MBCA 22, to support his position that a con......
  • R. v. Tcheong
    • Canada
    • Ontario Court of Justice General Division (Canada)
    • May 4, 2023
    ...others. He was sentenced to 20 months imprisonment and two years probation. [44]       In R. v. Kaardal 2022 ONCJ 441, the court considered a case involving 276 images of child pornography. The defendant was 70 years old and had been married for 50 years and ha......
  • R. v. DaSilva
    • Canada
    • Ontario Court of Justice General Division (Canada)
    • January 9, 2025
    ...The nature of the collection was at "the high end of abusive material." [85]        In R. v. Kardaal, 2022 ONCJ 441, just over 13 months was imposed for possessing 276 images and no videos. The offender was elderly and had significant health issues. He was......
  • Get Started for Free