R. v. Kam, 2020 BCSC 893

JurisdictionBritish Columbia
JudgeHonourable Madam Justice Gerow
Citation2020 BCSC 893
Docket Number27763
CourtSupreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
Date11 June 2020
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
2 practice notes
  • R v AM,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • November 14, 2022
    ...to knowledge and/or intent, particularly evidence of an accused’s mental state that points away from these elements: R v Kam, 2020 BCSC 893 at para 101-102. [166]       In addition, it is not enough under s 229(a)(ii) that an accused foresees a danger or......
  • R. v. Danjou,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • August 13, 2020
    ...he reached, his evidence is not evidence of the factual basis of those events: R. v. Abbey, [1982] 2 S.C.R. 24 at 44-46; R. v. Kam, 2020 BCSC 893 at paras. 117-118; R. v. Shearer, 2020 BCSC 116 at [88]       As the court said in Abbey at p. 46, later ......
2 cases
  • R v AM,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • November 14, 2022
    ...to knowledge and/or intent, particularly evidence of an accused’s mental state that points away from these elements: R v Kam, 2020 BCSC 893 at para 101-102. [166]       In addition, it is not enough under s 229(a)(ii) that an accused foresees a danger or......
  • R. v. Danjou,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • August 13, 2020
    ...he reached, his evidence is not evidence of the factual basis of those events: R. v. Abbey, [1982] 2 S.C.R. 24 at 44-46; R. v. Kam, 2020 BCSC 893 at paras. 117-118; R. v. Shearer, 2020 BCSC 116 at [88]       As the court said in Abbey at p. 46, later ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT