R. v. Khelawon,

JurisdictionFederal Jurisdiction (Canada)
JudgeMcLachlin, Beverley; Binnie, William Ian Corneil; LeBel, Louis; Deschamps, Marie; Fish, Morris J.; Abella, Rosalie Silberman; Charron, Louise
Citation2006 SCC 57,[2006] 2 SCR 787,220 OAC 338,71 WCB (2d) 498,274 DLR (4th) 385,215 CCC (3d) 161,[2006] CarswellOnt 7825,AZ-50400748,[2006] ACS no 57,[2006] SCJ No 57 (QL),42 CR (6th) 1,JE 2007-28,355 NR 267,EYB 2006-111773
Date14 December 2006
CourtSupreme Court (Canada)
Docket Number30857
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
716 practice notes
  • R. v. Griffin (J.) et al., (2009) 388 N.R. 334 (SCC)
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • June 18, 2009
    ...89]. R. v. Hawkins (K.R.) and Morin (C.), [1996] 3 S.C.R. 1043; 204 N.R. 241; 96 O.A.C. 81, refd to. [para. 89]. R. v. Khelawon (R.), [2006] 2 S.C.R. 787; 355 N.R. 267; 220 O.A.C. 338; 2006 SCC 57, refd to. [para. 89]. R. v. D.D., [2000] 2 S.C.R. 275; 259 N.R. 156; 136 O.A.C. 201; 2000 SCC ......
  • R. v. Bonisteel (R.),
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • September 9, 2008
    ...(R.D.), [2000] 2 S.C.R. 144; 258 N.R. 250; 148 Man.R.(2d) 161; 224 W.A.C. 161; 2000 SCC 40, refd to. [para. 81]. R. v. Khelawon (R.), [2006] 2 S.C.R. 787; 355 N.R. 267; 220 O.A.C. 338; 2006 SCC 57, refd to. [para. R. v. Oickle (R.F.), [2000] 2 S.C.R. 3; 259 N.R. 227; 187 N.S.R.(2d) 201; 585......
  • R. v. Samaniego,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • March 25, 2022
    ...[2013] 2 S.C.R. 720; R. v. Jarvis, 2002 SCC 73, [2002] 3 S.C.R. 757; R. v. Seaboyer, [1991] 2 S.C.R. 577; R. v. Khelawon, 2006 SCC 57, [2006] 2 S.C.R. 787; R. v. Clarke (1998), 18 C.R. (5th) 219; R. v. Shearing, 2002 SCC 58, [2002] 3 S.C.R. 33; R. v. Osolin, [1993] 4 S.C.R. 595; R. v. Araya......
  • R. v. Alcantara (J.R.) et al.,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • August 13, 2015
    ...185 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 62]. R. v. Saleh (F.) (2013), 314 O.A.C. 60; 2013 ONCA 742, refd to. [para. 62]. R. v. Khelawon (R.), [2006] 2 S.C.R. 787; 355 N.R. 267; 220 O.A.C. 338; 2006 SCC 57, refd to. [para. 84]. R. v. Baldree (C.), [2013] 2 S.C.R. 520; 445 N.R. 247; 306 O.A.C. 1; 2013 SC......
  • Get Started for Free
650 cases
  • Harkat, Re, (2014) 458 N.R. 67 (SCC)
    • Canada
    • Canada (Federal) Supreme Court of Canada
    • May 14, 2014
    ...[para. 73]. R. v. D.O.L., [1993] 4 S.C.R. 419; 161 N.R. 1; 88 Man.R.(2d) 241; 51 W.A.C. 241, refd to. [para. 76]. R. v. Khelawon (R.), [2006] 2 S.C.R. 787; 355 N.R. 267; 220 O.A.C. 338; 2006 SCC 57, refd to. [para. 76]. Charkaoui, Re, [2008] 2 S.C.R. 326; 376 N.R. 154; 2008 SCC 38, refd to.......
  • R. v. deKock (C.R.), 2009 ABCA 225
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • March 6, 2009
    ...to. [para. 25]. R. v. Yelle (J.) et al. (2006), 384 A.R. 331; 367 W.A.C. 331; 2006 ABCA 160, refd to. [para. 25]. R. v. Khelawon (R.), [2006] 2 S.C.R. 787; 355 N.R. 267; 220 O.A.C. 338; 2006 SCC 57, refd to. [para. 26]. R. v. Evans (C.D.), [1993] 3 S.C.R. 653; 158 N.R. 278; 145 A.R. 81; 55 ......
  • R. v. Goodstoney (G.E.), (2007) 404 A.R. 60 (CA)
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • March 23, 2007
    ... 148 Man.R.(2d) 161 ; 224 W.A.C. 161 ; 2000 SCC 40 , refd to. [para. 9]. R. v. Khelawon (R.) (2006), 355 N.R. 267 ; 220 O.A.C. 338 ; 42 C.R.(6th) 1; 2006 SCC 57 , refd to. [para. R. v. Underwood (G.R.) (2002), 320 A.R. 151 ; 288 W.A.C. 151 ; 170 C.C.C.(3d) 500 ; 2002 ABCA 310 , ref......
  • R. v. Samaniego, 2022 SCC 9
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • March 25, 2022
    ...[2013] 2 S.C.R. 720; R. v. Jarvis, 2002 SCC 73, [2002] 3 S.C.R. 757; R. v. Seaboyer, [1991] 2 S.C.R. 577; R. v. Khelawon, 2006 SCC 57, [2006] 2 S.C.R. 787; R. v. Clarke (1998), 18 C.R. (5th) 219; R. v. Shearing, 2002 SCC 58, [2002] 3 S.C.R. 33; R. v. Osolin, [1993] 4 S.C.R. 595; R. v. Araya......
  • Get Started for Free
3 firm's commentaries
  • Ontario Court Of Appeal Summaries (October 29 – November 2, 2018)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • November 9, 2018
    ...for the respondent Keywords: Criminal Law, Second-Degree Murder, Ante-Mortem Statement, Hearsay Evidence, R. v. Khelawon, 2006 SCC 57, [2006] 2 S.C.R. 787, Probative Value, Prejudicial Effect, R. v. Krasniqi, 2012 ONCA 561, 291 C.C.C. (3d) 236, Self-Defence, Criminal Code, R.S.C. 1985, c. C......
  • Top 5 Civil Appeals From The Court Of Appeal (January 2012)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • January 25, 2013
    ...however, that the deceased's statements were admissible under the principled approach to hearsay. Citing R. v. Khelawan, 2006 SCC 57, [2006] 2 S.C.R. 787, which established that hearsay evidence may be admitted "if sufficient indicia of necessity and reliability are established," Rosenberg ......
  • A Primer On Hearsay
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • August 1, 2019
    ...of hearsay. What is Hearsay? One of the leading cases on hearsay is the Supreme Court of Canada's decision in R. v. Khelawon, [2006] 2 S.C.R. 787. The Court noted that the essential defining features of hearsay an out-of-court statement is adduced to prove the truth of its contents, and the......
63 books & journal articles
  • Table of cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Archive The Law of Evidence. Seventh Edition
    • August 29, 2015
    ...No. 4, 2009 SCC 4 .......................................................................................... 571, 572 R. v. Khelawon, [2006] 2 S.C.R. 787, 215 C.C.C. (3d) 161, 2006 SCC 57, aff’g (2005), 195 O.A.C. 11, 194 C.C.C. (3d) 161, [2005] O.J. No. 723 (C.A.) ...............................
  • Table of Cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Archive The Law of Evidence. Revised Fifth Edition
    • September 2, 2008
    ...O.A.C. 353, 113 N.R. 53 ................... 115, 116, 120, 124, 125, 131, 139, 16 8, 180, 181, 297, 405, 420, 496, 552 R. v. Khelawon, [2006] 2 S.C.R. 787, 215 C.C.C. (3d) 161, 2006 SCC 57, aff’g (2005), 195 O.A.C. 11, 194 C.C.C. (3d) 161, [2005] O.J. No. 723 (C.A.) ......... 104, 107, 108,......
  • Parenting Arrangements after Divorce
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Archive Canadian Family Law. Seventh Edition
    • August 29, 2017
    ...assess its worth. The presence of corroborating or conflicting evidence may also be considered: see R. v. Khan; R. v. Khelawon , [2006] 2 S.C.R. 787. 25 In S.F.R. , the indicia of reliability in cases involving allegations of sexual abuse were held to include the following factors: timing o......
  • Hearsay
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Law of Evidence. Eighth Edition
    • June 25, 2020
    ...to this conclusion? Could these actions or that appearance be consistent with other causes? Sincerity: What is 4 Ibid ; R v Khelawon , [2006] 2 SCR 787 at para 2 [ Khelawon ]. 5 Baldree , above note 1 at para 32 [emphasis in original]. THE L AW OF EVIDENCE 138 P’s relationship with the accu......
  • Get Started for Free

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT