R. v. Kim (F.), 2000 BCSC 1506
| Judge | Dillon, J. |
| Court | Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada) |
| Case Date | October 13, 2000 |
| Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
| Citations | 2000 BCSC 1506;[2000] B.C.T.C. 827 (SC) |
R. v. Kim (F.), [2000] B.C.T.C. 827 (SC)
MLB headnote and full text
Temp. Cite: [2000] B.C.T.C. TBEd. NO.053
Her Majesty The Queen v. Frank Kim
(CC980707; 2000 BCSC 1506)
Indexed As: R. v. Kim (F.)
British Columbia Supreme Court
Vancouver
Dillon, J.
October 13, 2000.
Summary:
This headnote contains no summary.
Criminal Law - Topic 80
General principles - Res judicata (multiple convictions for same subject matter precluded) - Circumstances when defence may be raised - See paragraphs 5 to 11.
Criminal Law - Topic 3078
Special powers - Search warrants - Bodily substances - DNA samples - Re past offences - See paragraphs 86 to 91.
Criminal Law - Topic 5861
Sentencing - Sentence - Particular offences - Assault (incl. common assault) - See paragraphs 75 to 85.
Criminal Law - Topic 5871
Sentencing - Sentence - Particular offences - Possession and use or sale of weapons (incl. concealed weapon) - See paragraphs 75 to 85.
Criminal Law - Topic 5895
Sentencing - Sentence - Particular offences - Threats - See paragraphs 75 to 85.
Criminal Law - Topic 5919
Sentencing - Sentence - Particular offences - Prostitution or sexual services - Procuring - See paragraphs 75 to 85.
Criminal Law - Topic 6552
Dangerous or long-term offenders - Detention - Protection of the public - Pattern of repetitive behaviour - See paragraphs 12 to 67.
Criminal Law - Topic 6558
Dangerous or long-term offenders - Detention - Protection of the public - Dangerous sexual offender - See paragraphs 12 to 67.
Criminal Law - Topic 6562
Dangerous or long-term offenders - Detention - Protection of the public - Persistent aggressive behaviour - See paragraphs 12 to 67.
Criminal Law - Topic 6576
Dangerous or long-term offenders - Detention - Sentencing - Indeterminate v. determinate sentence - See paragraphs 68 to 74.
Cases Noticed:
R. v. Prince, [1986] 2 S.C.R. 480; 70 N.R. 119; 45 Man.R.(2d) 93; 54 C.R.(3d) 97; [1987] 1 W.W.R. 1; 33 D.L.R.(4th) 724; 30 C.C.C.(3d) 35, refd to. [para. 6].
R. v. Andrew (1990), 57 C.C.C.(3d) 301 (B.C.C.A.), refd to. [para. 6].
R. v. Worobec (1991), 63 C.C.C.(3d) 412 ( B.C.C.A.), refd to. [para. 7].
R. v. Brown (K.F.), [1991] 2 S.C.R. 518; 125 N.R. 363; 93 Sask.R. 81; 4 W.A.C. 81; 66 C.C.C.(3d) 1, refd to. [para. 13].
R. v. G.L.M. (1999), 128 B.C.A.C. 102; 208 W.A.C. 102; 138 C.C.C.(3d) 383 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 13].
R. v. Cooney (R.) (1995), 80 O.A.C. 89; 98 C.C.C.(3d) 196 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 13].
R. v. Gauthier (T.J.) (1996), 78 B.C.A.C. 85; 128 W.A.C. 85; 108 C.C.C.(3d) 231 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 13].
R. v. George (T.) (1998), 109 B.C.A.C. 32; 177 W.A.C. 32; 126 C.C.C.(3d) 384 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 31].
R. v. Turley (R.J.) (1999), 122 B.C.A.C. 133; 200 W.A.C. 133; 136 C.C.C.(3d) 426 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 31].
R. v. Grant, [1998] B.C.J. No. 3289 (S.C.), refd to. [para. 31].
R. v. Neve (L.C.) (1999), 237 A.R. 201; 197 W.A.C. 201; 137 C.C.C.(3d) 97; 71 Alta. L.R.(3d) 92 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 31].
R. v. Schwartz (D.L.), [2000] B.C.T.C. 4 (S.C.), refd to. [para. 31].
R. v. White, [1998] B.C.J. No. 3209 (S.C.), refd to. [para. 31].
R. v. Gibbon, [1998] B.C.J. No. 3210 (S.C.), refd to. [para. 31].
R. v. Veevee, [1999] Nu. J. No. 2 (N. Ct. Just.), refd to. [para. 31].
R. v. Vickers (J.T.) (1998), 105 B.C.A.C. 42; 171 W.A.C. 42 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 33].
R. v. Fleming (D.P.) (1992), 101 Nfld. & P.E.I.R. 91; 321 A.P.R. 91 (Nfld. S.C.), refd to. [para. 33].
R. v. D.P.F. - see R. v. Fleming (D.P.).
R. v. Lyons, [1987] 2 S.C.R. 309; 80 N.R. 161; 82 N.S.R.(2d) 271; 207 A.P.R. 271; 37 C.C.C.(3d) 1; 61 C.R.(3d) 1; 44 D.L.R.(4th) 193, refd to. [para. 44].
R. v. Carleton (1981), 6 W.W.R. 148; 32 A.R. 181; 69 C.C.C.(2d) 1; 23 C.R.(3d) 129 (C.A.), affd. [1983] 2 S.C.R. 58; 52 N.R. 293; 47 A.R. 160, refd to. [para. 45].
R. v. Sullivan (1987), 20 O.A.C. 323; 37 C.C.C.(3d) 143 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 45].
R. v. Oliver (D.E.) (1997), 193 A.R. 241; 135 W.A.C. 241; 114 C.C.C.(3d) 50 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 45].
R. v. Noyes (1991), 1 B.C.A.C. 81; 1 W.A.C. 81 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 45].
R. v. Currie (R.O.R.), [1997] 2 S.C.R. 260; 211 N.R. 321; 100 O.A.C. 161; 115 C.C.C.(3d) 205, refd to. [para. 50].
Klippert v. R., [1968] 2 C.C.C. 129 (S.C.C.), refd to. [para. 51].
R. v. Dow (D.R.) (1999), 120 B.C.A.C. 16; 196 W.A.C. 16; 134 C.C.C.(3d) 323 (C.A.), leave to appeal refused (1999), 248 N.R. 406; 135 B.C.A.C. 319; 221 W.A.C. 319 (S.C.C.), refd to. [para. 57].
R. v. Moore (1985), 7 O.A.C. 33; 16 C.C.C.( 3d) 328 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 68].
R. v. Greffe, [1990] 1 S.C.R. 755; 107 N.R. 1; 107 A.R. 1; 55 C.C.C.(3d) 161; 75 C.R.(3d) 257; 46 C.R.R. 1; [1990] 3 W.W.R. 577; 73 Alta. L.R.(2d) 97, refd to. [para. 89].
LaPorte and R., Re (1972), 8 C.C.C.(2d) 343 (Que. Q.B.), refd to. [para. 89].
Statutes Noticed:
Criminal Code, R.S.C. 1985, c. C-46, sect. 752(a), sect. 752(b) [para. 46]; sect. 753(b) [para. 49]; sect. 487.052 [para. 87].
Counsel:
Geordie Proux, for the Crown;
Frank Kim in person.
This case was heard on March 8, 10, 13 to 17, 20 to 25, April 3 to 7, May 15, 26, 29 to 31, June 1, 2, 12 to 16, 30 and September 18 to 22, 2000, before Dillon, J., of the British Columbia Supreme Court, who delivered the following decision on October 13, 2000.
Please note: The following judgment has not been edited.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
R. v. Boutilier (D.J.), 2015 BCSC 901
...that an offender is not committed to his treatment is an indication of future risk; R. v. Little , 2007 ONCA 548 at para. 43; R. v. Kim , 2000 BCSC 1506 at para. 71. [164] Dr. Schweighofer emphasized the importance of motivation in offenders. In his words, treatment is not done "to a person......
-
R. v. Peters (L.T.), [2001] B.C.T.C. 1199 (SC)
...a sentence of an indefinite term of imprisonment or a sentence for a fixed term. [142] Similarly, in R. v. Kim , [2000] B.C.J. No. 1716; 2000 BCSC 1506, decided under the old legislation, Dillon J. found that having found Mr. Kim to be a dangerous offender the only discretion she was requir......
-
R v Clayton,
...to his or her refusal to participate: R. v. Small aka Pizzey (29 July 1998), Fort St. John 10243 (B.C.S.C.). [238] See also R. v. Kim, 2000 BCSC 1506 at para. 43. 12 There are circumstances in which some weight may properly be placed upon an accused's refusal to speak to an examining 1......
-
R. v. Clayton,
...R. v. Small aka Pizzey (29 July 1998), Fort St. John 10243 (B.C.S.C.). [238] See also R. v. Kim, 2000 BCSC 1506 at [12] There are circumstances in which some weight may properly be placed upon an accused’s ref......
-
R. v. Boutilier (D.J.), 2015 BCSC 901
...that an offender is not committed to his treatment is an indication of future risk; R. v. Little , 2007 ONCA 548 at para. 43; R. v. Kim , 2000 BCSC 1506 at para. 71. [164] Dr. Schweighofer emphasized the importance of motivation in offenders. In his words, treatment is not done "to a person......
-
R. v. Peters (L.T.), [2001] B.C.T.C. 1199 (SC)
...a sentence of an indefinite term of imprisonment or a sentence for a fixed term. [142] Similarly, in R. v. Kim , [2000] B.C.J. No. 1716; 2000 BCSC 1506, decided under the old legislation, Dillon J. found that having found Mr. Kim to be a dangerous offender the only discretion she was requir......
-
R v Clayton,
...to his or her refusal to participate: R. v. Small aka Pizzey (29 July 1998), Fort St. John 10243 (B.C.S.C.). [238] See also R. v. Kim, 2000 BCSC 1506 at para. 43. 12 There are circumstances in which some weight may properly be placed upon an accused's refusal to speak to an examining 1......
-
R. v. Clayton,
...R. v. Small aka Pizzey (29 July 1998), Fort St. John 10243 (B.C.S.C.). [238] See also R. v. Kim, 2000 BCSC 1506 at [12] There are circumstances in which some weight may properly be placed upon an accused’s ref......