R. v. Kim (L.), 2016 ABPC 9
| Judge | Lepp, P.C.J. |
| Court | Provincial Court of Alberta (Canada) |
| Case Date | January 14, 2016 |
| Citations | 2016 ABPC 9 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
10 practice notes
-
Table of cases
................. 338 R v Khatra, 2017 BCPC 462 ................................................................................ 323 R v Kim, 2016 ABPC 9 .......................................................................................... 77 R v King, 2009 BCPC 26 .............................
-
Nature of the Interaction Between Police and Individuals
...insurance and the mechanical itness of cars. The police use of check stops should not be extended beyond these aims. 313 R v Kim , 2016 ABPC 9 at para 52, has gone even further by concluding that the minority in MacDonald was wrong about what the majority decided: “I am bound by the majorit......
-
Digest: R v Riggs, 2017 SKPC 94
...OAC 124, 245 CCC (3d) 1, 66 CR (6th) 1 R v Greenough, 2013 SKQB 208, 421 Sask R 295 R v Guichon, 2010 BCPC 335, 7 MVR (6th) 270 R v Kim, 2016 ABPC 9 R v Mann, 2004 SCC 52, [2004] 3 SCR 59, 324 NR 215, 241 DLR (4th) 214, 185 CCC (3d) 308, 21 CR (6th) 1 R v Ottenbreit, 2016 ABPC 77 R v Schwab......
-
R v Fournier, 2017 ABCA 424
...higher court definitively rules on this important issue I fall on the side represented by R v Parkar [2016 ABPC 169 [Parkar]] and R v Kim [2016 ABPC 9 [Kim]]... I cannot in this day and age accept that reasonable members of the public would be offended by either a “pat down” or being seated......
Request a trial to view additional results
7 cases
-
R v Fournier, 2017 ABCA 424
...higher court definitively rules on this important issue I fall on the side represented by R v Parkar [2016 ABPC 169 [Parkar]] and R v Kim [2016 ABPC 9 [Kim]]... I cannot in this day and age accept that reasonable members of the public would be offended by either a “pat down” or being seated......
-
R v Fournier, 2017 ABQB 533
...justifiable under ss 8 and 9 of the Charter. He expressed his agreement with the approach taken in R v Parkar, 2016 ABPC 169 and R v Kim, 2016 ABPC 9. He added that courts are able to make decisions on a case-by-case basis as to whether the police have strayed into abusive searches or rando......
-
R. v. SHARPE, 2018 MBPC 10
...review of the Alberta cases. At paragraph 29, Justice Ross considers two decisions of Alberta Provincial Court Judge Lepp: R. v. Kim 2016 ABPC 9, and R. v. Lorio (unreported June 19, 2015) “Lepp PCJ pointed to the fact that ASD’s are sensitive electronic devices. H......
-
R v Fournier, 2016 ABPC 295
...2016 ABPC 169. Until a higher court definitively rules on this important issue I fall on the side represented by Parker and R. v. Kim, 2016 ABPC 9. I cannot in this day and age accept reasonable members of the public would be offended by either a “pat down” or being seated in a police vehic......
Request a trial to view additional results
3 books & journal articles
-
Table of cases
................. 338 R v Khatra, 2017 BCPC 462 ................................................................................ 323 R v Kim, 2016 ABPC 9 .......................................................................................... 77 R v King, 2009 BCPC 26 .............................
-
Nature of the Interaction Between Police and Individuals
...insurance and the mechanical itness of cars. The police use of check stops should not be extended beyond these aims. 313 R v Kim , 2016 ABPC 9 at para 52, has gone even further by concluding that the minority in MacDonald was wrong about what the majority decided: “I am bound by the majorit......
-
Digest: R v Riggs, 2017 SKPC 94
...OAC 124, 245 CCC (3d) 1, 66 CR (6th) 1 R v Greenough, 2013 SKQB 208, 421 Sask R 295 R v Guichon, 2010 BCPC 335, 7 MVR (6th) 270 R v Kim, 2016 ABPC 9 R v Mann, 2004 SCC 52, [2004] 3 SCR 59, 324 NR 215, 241 DLR (4th) 214, 185 CCC (3d) 308, 21 CR (6th) 1 R v Ottenbreit, 2016 ABPC 77 R v Schwab......