R. v. Klein, 2020 BCSC 333
| Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
| Judge | Honourable Associate Chief Justice H. Holmes |
| Citation | 2020 BCSC 333 |
| Date | 06 March 2020 |
| Court | Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada) |
| Docket Number | 66296 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
7 practice notes
-
R. v. Danjou,
...accused at the time in question” … [97] As Holmes A.C.J. said in R. v. Klein, 2020 BCSC 333: [158] As has been noted many times in the case authorities, direct evidence of an accused person’s state of mind is of......
-
R. v. Klein,
...what extent he is responsible for the horrific events at the school. As has already been explained in the reasons after the trial (2020 BCSC 333) and the reasons after the NCRMD hearing ( 2021 BCSC 743 ), I concluded that Mr. Klein was fully responsible for those acts. Thos......
-
R v Russell,
...must carefully consider the evidence that points away from it. 105 As was explained by Associate Chief Justice Holmes in R. v. Klein, 2020 BCSC 333 at para. 160: The common sense inference was traditionally described as applying to the “sane and sober” accused person, and was ......
-
R. v. Lewis,
...he formed the necessary specific intent (see R. v. Bailey (1996), 111 C.C.C. (3d) 122 (B.C.C.A.)) (See also R. v. Klein, 2020 BCSC 333 [Klein] at para. 165; R. v. Batstone, 2019 BCSC 476 [Batstone] at [25] The ultimate burden of ......
Request a trial to view additional results
7 cases
-
R. v. Danjou,
...accused at the time in question” … [97] As Holmes A.C.J. said in R. v. Klein, 2020 BCSC 333: [158] As has been noted many times in the case authorities, direct evidence of an accused person’s state of mind is of......
-
R. v. Klein,
...what extent he is responsible for the horrific events at the school. As has already been explained in the reasons after the trial (2020 BCSC 333) and the reasons after the NCRMD hearing ( 2021 BCSC 743 ), I concluded that Mr. Klein was fully responsible for those acts. Thos......
-
R v Russell,
...must carefully consider the evidence that points away from it. 105 As was explained by Associate Chief Justice Holmes in R. v. Klein, 2020 BCSC 333 at para. 160: The common sense inference was traditionally described as applying to the “sane and sober” accused person, and was ......
-
R. v. Lewis,
...he formed the necessary specific intent (see R. v. Bailey (1996), 111 C.C.C. (3d) 122 (B.C.C.A.)) (See also R. v. Klein, 2020 BCSC 333 [Klein] at para. 165; R. v. Batstone, 2019 BCSC 476 [Batstone] at [25] The ultimate burden of ......
Request a trial to view additional results