R v Kolola,

JurisdictionNunavut
JudgeThe Honourable Justice Shannon Smallwood,The Honourable Justice Jolaine Antonio,The Honourable Justice Kevin Feehan
Neutral Citation2021 NUCA 11
Docket Number09-20-018-CAP
Citation2021 NUCA 11
Date26 July 2021
CourtNunavut Court of Appeal (Canada)
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
5 practice notes
  • R v Mosquito,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • March 2, 2023
    ...at para 43). 92 These comments mirror the following statement by the Nunavut Court of Appeal in its per curiam decision in R v Kolola, 2021 NUCA 11: [18] The COVID-19 pandemic may be considered a consequence which might have a more significant impact on an offender because of his unique and......
  • R. v. Livingstone,
    • Canada
    • Nunavut Court of Justice (Canada)
    • August 5, 2022
    ...[40] Sentencing Submissions, July 19, 2022, p.1. [41] R v Parranto, 2021 S.C.C. 46 (CanLII), headnote. [42] 2020 NUCJ 38; upheld on appeal 2021 NUCA 11. [43] Ibid para [44] R v Arcand, 2010 ABCA 363 (CanLII). The Alberta Court of Appeal defined ‘major sexual assault’ as one wh......
  • R v Biever,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • April 25, 2023
    ...“collateral consequence” that might result in a more lenient sentence: see R v Morgan, 2020 ONCA 279 at para 9; R v Kolola, 2021 NUCA 11 at para 18; R v Caribou, 2022 MBCA 95 at para 45; R v Mosquito, 2023 SKCA 29 at paras 23 Such conditions have also been addressed using the ......
  • R v Biever,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • April 25, 2023
    ...“collateral consequence” that might result in a more lenient sentence: see R v Morgan, 2020 ONCA 279 at para 9; R v Kolola, 2021 NUCA 11 at para 18; R v Caribou, 2022 MBCA 95 at para 45; R v Mosquito, 2023 SKCA 29 at paras 89-93. [23]       &......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
5 cases
  • R v Mosquito,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • March 2, 2023
    ...at para 43). 92 These comments mirror the following statement by the Nunavut Court of Appeal in its per curiam decision in R v Kolola, 2021 NUCA 11: [18] The COVID-19 pandemic may be considered a consequence which might have a more significant impact on an offender because of his unique and......
  • R. v. Livingstone,
    • Canada
    • Nunavut Court of Justice (Canada)
    • August 5, 2022
    ...[40] Sentencing Submissions, July 19, 2022, p.1. [41] R v Parranto, 2021 S.C.C. 46 (CanLII), headnote. [42] 2020 NUCJ 38; upheld on appeal 2021 NUCA 11. [43] Ibid para [44] R v Arcand, 2010 ABCA 363 (CanLII). The Alberta Court of Appeal defined ‘major sexual assault’ as one wh......
  • R v Biever,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • April 25, 2023
    ...“collateral consequence” that might result in a more lenient sentence: see R v Morgan, 2020 ONCA 279 at para 9; R v Kolola, 2021 NUCA 11 at para 18; R v Caribou, 2022 MBCA 95 at para 45; R v Mosquito, 2023 SKCA 29 at paras 23 Such conditions have also been addressed using the ......
  • R v Biever,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • April 25, 2023
    ...“collateral consequence” that might result in a more lenient sentence: see R v Morgan, 2020 ONCA 279 at para 9; R v Kolola, 2021 NUCA 11 at para 18; R v Caribou, 2022 MBCA 95 at para 45; R v Mosquito, 2023 SKCA 29 at paras 89-93. [23]       &......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT