R. v. L.K., 2020 ONCA 262
| Jurisdiction | Ontario |
| Judge | Doherty, Watt and Hourigan JJ.A. |
| Citation | 2020 ONCA 262 |
| Docket Number | C56622 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Ontario) |
| Date | 23 April 2020 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
8 practice notes
-
Court Of Appeal Summaries (April 20 ' 24, 2020)
...W.M., 2020 ONCA 266 Keywords: Criminal Law, Sexual Assault, Bail, R. v. Manasseri, 2017 ONCA 226, R. v. St-Cloud, 2015 SCC 27 R. v. L.K., 2020 ONCA 262 Keywords: Criminal Law, Sexual Assault, Criminal Negligence, Obstructing Justice, R. v. Keinapple, [1975] 1 S.C.R. 729 R. v. T., 2020 ONCA ......
-
R. v. Barrett, 2022 ONCA 355
...on the evidence, even if they are not raised by the defence. A failure to object to a jury charge is not fatal to an appeal: R. v. L.K., 2020 ONCA 262, at para. [56] As noted earlier, defence counsel requested that the trial judge instruct the jury on pro......
-
R. v. MCCAIG, 2022 SKQB 121
...Further, as recently articulated by the Ontario Court of Appeal in R v L.K., 2020 ONCA 262: [18] The second part of the W.D. analysis provides that if the jury does not believe the accused’s testimony or other exculpatory evidence, but this evi......
-
R. v. Alas, 2021 ONCA 224
...on the evidence, even if they are not raised by the defence. A failure to object to a jury charge is not fatal to an appeal: R. v. L.K., 2020 ONCA 262, at para. 15. However, the position taken by counsel at trial will “assist an appellate court in determining whether the defence does proper......
Request a trial to view additional results
7 cases
-
R. v. Barrett,
...on the evidence, even if they are not raised by the defence. A failure to object to a jury charge is not fatal to an appeal: R. v. L.K., 2020 ONCA 262, at para. [56] As noted earlier, defence counsel requested that the trial judge instruct the jury on pro......
-
R. v. MCCAIG,
...Further, as recently articulated by the Ontario Court of Appeal in R v L.K., 2020 ONCA 262: [18] The second part of the W.D. analysis provides that if the jury does not believe the accused’s testimony or other exculpatory evidence, but this evi......
-
R. v. Daou,
...to object, but such a failure is not determinative to the application of the proviso; it is simply one fact to consider: R. v. L.K., 2020 ONCA 262, at para. 15; R. v. Cook, 2020 ONCA 731, 153 O.R. (3d) 65, at paras. 68-71; and Borel, at para. [109] The trial judge did not ......
-
R. v. Ho-On,
...respect to exculpatory evidence: he or she can reject it, accept it, or be unsure whether the evidence is true or false: see R. v. L.K, 2020 ONCA 262, at paras.18-19. Either of the latter two options leads to a verdict of not guilty. Even if the exculpatory evidence is rejected, a finding o......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
-
Court Of Appeal Summaries (April 20 ' 24, 2020)
...W.M., 2020 ONCA 266 Keywords: Criminal Law, Sexual Assault, Bail, R. v. Manasseri, 2017 ONCA 226, R. v. St-Cloud, 2015 SCC 27 R. v. L.K., 2020 ONCA 262 Keywords: Criminal Law, Sexual Assault, Criminal Negligence, Obstructing Justice, R. v. Keinapple, [1975] 1 S.C.R. 729 R. v. T., 2020 ONCA ......