R v Lachance,
| Jurisdiction | Saskatchewan |
| Judge | Barrington-Foote,Caldwell,Leurer |
| Citation | 2023 SKCA 48 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan) |
| Docket Number | CACR3495 |
| Date | 25 April 2023 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
2 practice notes
-
Stromberg v Olafson,
...the statements made by the Chambers judge, should be treated as if they are part of his reasons. As this Court noted in R v Lachance, 2023 SKCA 48, while it is sometimes appropriate to do so, “[c]aution is very much in order when a court is considering whether to draw inferences base......
-
R v Lachance,
...His Majesty the King Appellant and Jacky Regan Lachance Respondent 2023 SKCA 48 Before: Caldwell, Leurer and Barrington-Foote Docket: CACR3495 Court of Appeal for Saskatchewan Counsel: W. Dean Sinclair, K.C. for the Appellant Thomas Hynes and Aleida Oberholzer for the Respondent Barrington-......
2 cases
-
Stromberg v Olafson,
...the statements made by the Chambers judge, should be treated as if they are part of his reasons. As this Court noted in R v Lachance, 2023 SKCA 48, while it is sometimes appropriate to do so, “[c]aution is very much in order when a court is considering whether to draw inferences base......
-
R v Lachance,
...His Majesty the King Appellant and Jacky Regan Lachance Respondent 2023 SKCA 48 Before: Caldwell, Leurer and Barrington-Foote Docket: CACR3495 Court of Appeal for Saskatchewan Counsel: W. Dean Sinclair, K.C. for the Appellant Thomas Hynes and Aleida Oberholzer for the Respondent Barrington-......