R v Lachance,

JurisdictionSaskatchewan
JudgeBarrington-Foote,Caldwell,Leurer
Citation2023 SKCA 48
Docket NumberCACR3495
CourtCourt of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
Date25 April 2023
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
3 practice notes
  • R v Stevenson,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • April 11, 2024
    ...it must be treated with considerable caution by a trier of fact ( R v Hibbert, 2002 SCC 39 at paras 50–53; [2002] 2 SCR 445; R v Lachance, 2023 SKCA 48 at paras 80–81; R v Clark, 2022 SCC 49, endorsing the dissenting reasons of Leurer J.A. (as he then was) in R v Clark, SKCA 36 at para 72, ......
  • Stromberg v Olafson,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • June 2, 2023
    ...the statements made by the Chambers judge, should be treated as if they are part of his reasons. As this Court noted in R v Lachance, 2023 SKCA 48, while it is sometimes appropriate to do so, “[c]aution is very much in order when a court is considering whether to draw inferences base......
  • R v Lachance,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • April 25, 2023
    ...His Majesty the King Appellant and Jacky Regan Lachance Respondent 2023 SKCA 48 Before: Caldwell, Leurer and Barrington-Foote Docket: CACR3495 Court of Appeal for Saskatchewan Counsel: W. Dean Sinclair, K.C. for the Appellant Thomas Hynes and Aleida Oberholzer for the Respondent Barrington-......
3 cases
  • R v Stevenson,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • April 11, 2024
    ...it must be treated with considerable caution by a trier of fact ( R v Hibbert, 2002 SCC 39 at paras 50–53; [2002] 2 SCR 445; R v Lachance, 2023 SKCA 48 at paras 80–81; R v Clark, 2022 SCC 49, endorsing the dissenting reasons of Leurer J.A. (as he then was) in R v Clark, SKCA 36 at para 72, ......
  • Stromberg v Olafson,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • June 2, 2023
    ...the statements made by the Chambers judge, should be treated as if they are part of his reasons. As this Court noted in R v Lachance, 2023 SKCA 48, while it is sometimes appropriate to do so, “[c]aution is very much in order when a court is considering whether to draw inferences base......
  • R v Lachance,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • April 25, 2023
    ...His Majesty the King Appellant and Jacky Regan Lachance Respondent 2023 SKCA 48 Before: Caldwell, Leurer and Barrington-Foote Docket: CACR3495 Court of Appeal for Saskatchewan Counsel: W. Dean Sinclair, K.C. for the Appellant Thomas Hynes and Aleida Oberholzer for the Respondent Barrington-......