R. v. Lahouri (A.), 2013 ONSC 2085
| Judge | K.L. Campbell, J. |
| Court | Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada) |
| Case Date | April 09, 2013 |
| Jurisdiction | Ontario |
| Citations | 2013 ONSC 2085;[2013] O.T.C. Uned. 2085;[2013] O.T.C. Uned. 2085 (SC) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 practice notes
-
R. v. Pletsas (J.T.), [2014] O.T.C. Uned. 1568 (SC)
...of the offence. 2. The Interventions by the Trial Judge a. The Governing Legal Principles [37] Relatively recently, in R. v. Lahouri , 2013 ONSC 2085, 280 C.R.R. (2d) 249, at paras. 4-10, I sought to outline the governing legal principles that must be considered where it is alleged, on appe......
-
R v Quintero-Gelvez, 2019 ABCA 17
...of objections from defence counsel to the judge’s interventions is a relevant factor, although it is not determinative; see R v Lahouri, 2013 ONSC 2085 at para 10. Appellate Crown properly conceded that while it is preferable for defence counsel to have made such an objection at trial, the ......
-
R. v. Giovannini, 2018 NLCA 19
...a question which could be in the nature of cross-examination. In this regard I disagree with the trial judge in R. v. Lahouri, 2013 ONSC 2085, relied on by Mr. Giovannini, wherein the judge lists “no cross-examination” as a principle governing judicial questioning. ......
-
R. v. Fagbola, 2019 ONSC 1119
...prevent an accused from “telling his story in his own way” can compromise the fairness of the trial: Valley, at p. 231; R. v. Lahouri, 2013 ONSC 2085, 280 C.R.R. (2d) 249, at para. 9; R. v. Adano, [2008] O.J. No. 1995 (S.C.J.), at para. 24. [13] I do not read the cases the appellant relies ......
4 cases
-
R. v. Pletsas (J.T.), [2014] O.T.C. Uned. 1568 (SC)
...of the offence. 2. The Interventions by the Trial Judge a. The Governing Legal Principles [37] Relatively recently, in R. v. Lahouri , 2013 ONSC 2085, 280 C.R.R. (2d) 249, at paras. 4-10, I sought to outline the governing legal principles that must be considered where it is alleged, on appe......
-
R v Quintero-Gelvez, 2019 ABCA 17
...of objections from defence counsel to the judge’s interventions is a relevant factor, although it is not determinative; see R v Lahouri, 2013 ONSC 2085 at para 10. Appellate Crown properly conceded that while it is preferable for defence counsel to have made such an objection at trial, the ......
-
R. v. Giovannini, 2018 NLCA 19
...a question which could be in the nature of cross-examination. In this regard I disagree with the trial judge in R. v. Lahouri, 2013 ONSC 2085, relied on by Mr. Giovannini, wherein the judge lists “no cross-examination” as a principle governing judicial questioning. ......
-
R. v. Fagbola, 2019 ONSC 1119
...prevent an accused from “telling his story in his own way” can compromise the fairness of the trial: Valley, at p. 231; R. v. Lahouri, 2013 ONSC 2085, 280 C.R.R. (2d) 249, at para. 9; R. v. Adano, [2008] O.J. No. 1995 (S.C.J.), at para. 24. [13] I do not read the cases the appellant relies ......