R. v. Lambrinoudis, (1977) 4 A.R. 326 (DC)
Court | Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada) |
Case Date | May 11, 1977 |
Citations | (1977), 4 A.R. 326 (DC) |
R. v. Lambrinoudis (1977), 4 A.R. 326 (DC)
MLB headnote and full text
R. v. Lambrinoudis
Indexed As: R. v. Lambrinoudis
Alberta District Court
Judicial District of MacLeod
Tavender, J.D.C.
May 11, 1977.
Summary:
This headnote contains no summary.
Fish and Game - Topic 2413
Offences - Hunting - Tagging of animals after killing - Alberta Wild life Act, s. 50(3) - The accused was charged with failing to tag a big game animal after it was killed as required by the Wildlife Act - The accused killed a mule deer and affixed the wrong tag to the carcass - The accused offered the defence of honest mistake - The trial judge convicted the accused and held that the defence of honest mistake was not available to the accused - On appeal, the Alberta District Court directed a new trial - The District Court stated that even though the offence was one of strict liability the defence of honest mistake was available to the accused.
Cases Noticed:
R. v. Hickey (1976), 29 C.C.C.(2d) 23, folld. [paras. 10, 23].
Proudman v. Dayman (1943), 67 C.L.R. 536, refd to. [para. 13].
Sweet v. Parsley, [1969] 2 W.L.R. 470, folld. [para. 14].
R. v. Pierce Fisheries Limited, 3 N.S.R. 1965-69 1; [1971] S.C.R. 5, folld. [para. 17].
R. v. Custeau (1972), 17 C.R.(N.S.) 127, folld. [para. 19].
R. v. Hill, 1 N.R. 136; [1975] 2 S.C.R. 402, folld. [para. 21].
R. v. King, [1962] S.C.R. 746, folld. [para. 22].
R. v. Servico Limited, 4 A.R. 18, folld. [para. 24].
R. v. Oyer (1972), 8 C.C.C. 479, folld. [para. 25].
R. v. Edwards, 2 A.R. 359, folld. [para. 25].
Statutes Noticed:
Wildlife Act, R.S.A. 1970, c. 391, sect. 50(3) [para. 2].
Counsel:
R. Jobbins, for the Crown;
Mrs. P. Sveen, for the appellant.
The judgment of the Alberta District Court was delivered by TAVENDER, J.D.C., at Fort Macleod, Alberta on May 11, 1977.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
R. v. Lambrinoudis, (1978) 8 A.R. 158 (CA)
...the accused and held that the defence of honest mistake was not available to the accused. The Alberta District Court in a judgment reported 4 A.R. 326 allowed the accused's appeal and directed a new trial. The District Court held that, although the offence was one of strict liability, the d......
-
R. v. Lambrinoudis, (1978) 8 A.R. 158 (CA)
...the accused and held that the defence of honest mistake was not available to the accused. The Alberta District Court in a judgment reported 4 A.R. 326 allowed the accused's appeal and directed a new trial. The District Court held that, although the offence was one of strict liability, the d......