R. v Latham, 2018 ABCA 267
| Judge | Frans Slatter |
| Docket Number | 1803-0070-AC |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Alberta) |
| Date | 17 August 2018 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
39 practice notes
-
Latham (Re), 2018 ABQB 906
...potential habeas corpus jurisdiction. Mr. Latham knows that, as that was the finding of the Alberta Court of Appeal in R v Latham, 2018 ABCA 267 at para 10, where Slatter JA concluded Mr. Latham had no reasonable arguable ground to advance a habeas corpus [25] DG v Bowden Institution, 2016 ......
-
Latham (Re), 2018 ABQB 955
...variety of relief. He argued his appeal of Latham #2 should be permitted to proceed despite Latham #4. In reasons reported at R v Latham, 2018 ABCA 267 [Latham #5], Slatter JA dismissed Mr. Latham’s application and struck out the appeal from Latham #2. [12] Latham #5 made a number of findin......
-
El Sayed v Canada (Minister of Justice and Solicitor General),
...to submit a Written Submission of up to ten-pages to explain why this Court is not bound by Armaly v Canada, 2001 ABCA 280, R v Latham, 2018 ABCA 267, and R v Latham, 2018 ABCA 308. The Respondents then had seven days to submit a Written Reply, to a maximum of [5] &#x......
-
Heiser v Bowden Institution,
...... [Emphasis added.] [14] Slatter JA recently confirmed the binding status of Armaly v Canada in R v Latham, 2018 ABCA 267 at paras 9-10, leave to appeal to SCC refused, 38437 (14 March ... The writ of habeas corpus is a fundamental constitutional remedy designed to......
Request a trial to view additional results
39 cases
-
Latham (Re), 2018 ABQB 906
...potential habeas corpus jurisdiction. Mr. Latham knows that, as that was the finding of the Alberta Court of Appeal in R v Latham, 2018 ABCA 267 at para 10, where Slatter JA concluded Mr. Latham had no reasonable arguable ground to advance a habeas corpus [25] DG v Bowden Institution, 2016 ......
-
Latham (Re), 2018 ABQB 955
...variety of relief. He argued his appeal of Latham #2 should be permitted to proceed despite Latham #4. In reasons reported at R v Latham, 2018 ABCA 267 [Latham #5], Slatter JA dismissed Mr. Latham’s application and struck out the appeal from Latham #2. [12] Latham #5 made a number of findin......
-
El Sayed v Canada (Minister of Justice and Solicitor General),
...to submit a Written Submission of up to ten-pages to explain why this Court is not bound by Armaly v Canada, 2001 ABCA 280, R v Latham, 2018 ABCA 267, and R v Latham, 2018 ABCA 308. The Respondents then had seven days to submit a Written Reply, to a maximum of [5] &#x......
-
Heiser v Bowden Institution,
...... [Emphasis added.] [14] Slatter JA recently confirmed the binding status of Armaly v Canada in R v Latham, 2018 ABCA 267 at paras 9-10, leave to appeal to SCC refused, 38437 (14 March ... The writ of habeas corpus is a fundamental constitutional remedy designed to......
Request a trial to view additional results