R. v. Lawson, 2019 BCCA 290
Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
Judge | The Honourable Mr. Justice Groberman,The Honourable Madam Justice Fenlon,The Honourable Mr. Justice Abrioux |
Docket Number | CA44027 |
Court | Court of Appeal (British Columbia) |
Date | 04 September 2019 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
6 practice notes
-
Trans Mountain Pipeline ULC v. Mivasair,,
...addressed in McKibbin are not present here. [79] The Crown also refers to R. v. Lawson, 2019 BCCA 290. The offender had significant health issues. However, at para. 22, the court noted that his health concerns did not amount to an “overr......
-
R. v. Navas,
...offence. A DNA order is not a sentence and nor is it a form of punishment: see R. v. R.C, 2005 SCC 61, at para. 39; R. v. Lawson, 2019 BCCA 290 at para. [35] A court may order that an offender provide a DNA sample for a secondary designated offence ......
-
R. v. Herbert,
...will provide a sample of his DNA as required, pursuant to s. 487.051 of the Code as, in my view, the tests set out in R v. Lawson, 2019 BCCA 290, [2019] BCJ No. 1652, and R. v. Awasis, 2009 BCCA 134, [2009] BCJ No. 583, have been met. [4] ......
-
R. v. Desmond, 2020 NSCA 1
...within the range of tools from which the judge may craft the sentence. (See also, R. v. Cross, 2006 NSCA 30, ¶48; and R. v. Lawson, 2019 BCCA 290, [36] It was noted by the Supreme Court in R. v. Rodgers, 2006 SCC 15 at ¶32: [32] ......
Request a trial to view additional results
7 cases
-
R v Anderson,
...(1 October 2014), Grand Prairie 131117566P1 (Alta. Q.B.); R. v. Millar, 2017 BCSC 402; R. v. Lawson, 2016 BCSC 2446, aff'd 2019 BCCA 290; R. v. Eddy, (4 February 2016) Edmonton 120435839 (Alta. Q.B.); R. v. Stanchfield, (23 November 2015), Vancouver 886-1 (B.C.P.C.); R. v. Lewry, (26 O......
-
R. v. Navas,
...offence. A DNA order is not a sentence and nor is it a form of punishment: see R. v. R.C, 2005 SCC 61, at para. 39; R. v. Lawson, 2019 BCCA 290 at para. [35] A court may order that an offender provide a DNA sample for a secondary designated offence ......
-
Trans Mountain Pipeline ULC v. Mivasair,,
...addressed in McKibbin are not present here. [79] The Crown also refers to R. v. Lawson, 2019 BCCA 290. The offender had significant health issues. However, at para. 22, the court noted that his health concerns did not amount to an “overr......
-
R. v. Herbert,
...will provide a sample of his DNA as required, pursuant to s. 487.051 of the Code as, in my view, the tests set out in R v. Lawson, 2019 BCCA 290, [2019] BCJ No. 1652, and R. v. Awasis, 2009 BCCA 134, [2009] BCJ No. 583, have been met. [4] ......
Request a trial to view additional results