R. v. Leclair,
| Jurisdiction | Ontario |
| Judge | Justice R. Kwolek |
| Citation | 2020 ONCJ 260 |
| Docket Number | Sault Ste. Marie 0131-998-19-1142-04 |
| Court | Ontario Court of Justice General Division (Canada) |
| Date | 28 May 2020 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
7 practice notes
-
The Pains of Imprisonment in a Pandemic.
...2020 ONSC 3878 at paras 35-36. See also R v Prince, 2020 ONSC 6121 at para 75. (65.) R v Clarke, supra note 64 at paras 39-40. (66.) 2020 ONCJ 260 at para (67.) See R v Stevens, 2020 ONCJ 616 (where the Court gave a "special COVID 19 enhanced presentence custody credit" in the case of an ac......
-
R. v. Chen
...to the spread of COVID, is a benefit to society that can balance out factors weighing in favour of actual imprisonment (R. v. Leclair, 2020 ONCJ 260 at para. 102). [61] Counsel also refers to various reliable publicly available sources to show the increasing number of COVID infections and d......
-
R v Buschemeyer, 2021 ABQB 1008
...may be appropriate in situations involving particularly harsh prison conditions. Similarly, in R v Adams, 2016 ABQB 648, and R v Leclair, 2020 ONCJ 260, the sentencing judge reduced the sentence that might otherwise have been appropriate on account of what were characterized as the mitigati......
-
R v Gordey, 2020 ABQB 425
...2019 ABCA 149, as well as the decision in R v Prystay, 2019 ABQB 8; R v Duncan, 2016 ONCA 754; R v Brown, 2020 ONCA 196; and R v Leclair, 2020 ONCJ 260, the Accused says that a sentence judge is not limited to awarding a maximum of 1.5:1 credit for pre-trial custody in appropriate [49] In t......
Get Started for Free
6 cases
-
R. v. Chen
...to the spread of COVID, is a benefit to society that can balance out factors weighing in favour of actual imprisonment (R. v. Leclair, 2020 ONCJ 260 at para. 102). [61] Counsel also refers to various reliable publicly available sources to show the increasing number of COVID infections and d......
-
R v Buschemeyer, 2021 ABQB 1008
...may be appropriate in situations involving particularly harsh prison conditions. Similarly, in R v Adams, 2016 ABQB 648, and R v Leclair, 2020 ONCJ 260, the sentencing judge reduced the sentence that might otherwise have been appropriate on account of what were characterized as the mitigati......
-
R v Gordey, 2020 ABQB 425
...2019 ABCA 149, as well as the decision in R v Prystay, 2019 ABQB 8; R v Duncan, 2016 ONCA 754; R v Brown, 2020 ONCA 196; and R v Leclair, 2020 ONCJ 260, the Accused says that a sentence judge is not limited to awarding a maximum of 1.5:1 credit for pre-trial custody in appropriate [49] In t......
-
R. v. DILLON
...55. [84]                    In R v Leclair, 2020 ONCJ 260 [Leclair], the court likewise acknowledged, at para. 104, that “Covid-19 is a factor that the court considers in determining whether any......
Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
-
The Pains of Imprisonment in a Pandemic.
...2020 ONSC 3878 at paras 35-36. See also R v Prince, 2020 ONSC 6121 at para 75. (65.) R v Clarke, supra note 64 at paras 39-40. (66.) 2020 ONCJ 260 at para (67.) See R v Stevens, 2020 ONCJ 616 (where the Court gave a "special COVID 19 enhanced presentence custody credit" in the case of an ac......