R v Ledesma, 2020 ABQB 117

JudgeGates
Date12 February 2020
Citation2020 ABQB 117
Docket Number120236229Q1
CourtCourt of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
5 practice notes
  • Capital City News Group Ltd. v. British Columbia,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • October 31, 2022
    ...a measure of reliability in the context of a Mr. Big undercover operation (see e.g. R. v. Hart, 2014 SCC 52 at para. 105; R. v. Ledesma, 2020 ABQB 117 at paras. 148, 151, aff’d 2021 ABCA 143; R. v. Baranec, 2020 BCCA 156 at paras. 22, 100, 146; R. v. Moir, 2020 BCCA 116 at paras. 17,......
  • R v Ledesma,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • April 21, 2021
    ...25, 2018 (2018 ABQB 1055) 2 months Hart (Mr Big) application October 24, 2018 November 22, 2018 December 31, 2018 February 12, 2020 (2020 ABQB 117) 15 Garofoli (wiretap) application November 22, 2018 November 22, 2018 December 31, 2018 March 31, 2020 (2020 ABQB 222) 16 months Jury array cha......
  • Canada (Attorney General) v Canadian Broadcasting Corporation,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • June 24, 2021
    ...2019 ABQB 588), or as a measure of reliability in the context of a “Mr. Big” operation (R v Hart, 2014 SCC 52; R v Ledesma, 2020 ABQB 117). Those cases also disclose, however, that holdback information is but one form of confirmatory evidence and that there are other checks an......
  • R v Bennett,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • November 26, 2020
    ...83. The Court needs to consider in what way the inducements offered would affect the reliability of the confession. [73] In R v Ledesma, 2020 ABQB 117 [Ledesma 2020], Justice Gates concluded that the accused’s confessions were not as a result of any inducements that rose to the level of coe......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
5 cases
  • Capital City News Group Ltd. v. British Columbia,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • October 31, 2022
    ...a measure of reliability in the context of a Mr. Big undercover operation (see e.g. R. v. Hart, 2014 SCC 52 at para. 105; R. v. Ledesma, 2020 ABQB 117 at paras. 148, 151, aff’d 2021 ABCA 143; R. v. Baranec, 2020 BCCA 156 at paras. 22, 100, 146; R. v. Moir, 2020 BCCA 116 at paras. 17,......
  • R v Ledesma,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • April 21, 2021
    ...25, 2018 (2018 ABQB 1055) 2 months Hart (Mr Big) application October 24, 2018 November 22, 2018 December 31, 2018 February 12, 2020 (2020 ABQB 117) 15 Garofoli (wiretap) application November 22, 2018 November 22, 2018 December 31, 2018 March 31, 2020 (2020 ABQB 222) 16 months Jury array cha......
  • Canada (Attorney General) v Canadian Broadcasting Corporation,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • June 24, 2021
    ...2019 ABQB 588), or as a measure of reliability in the context of a “Mr. Big” operation (R v Hart, 2014 SCC 52; R v Ledesma, 2020 ABQB 117). Those cases also disclose, however, that holdback information is but one form of confirmatory evidence and that there are other checks an......
  • R v Bennett,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • November 26, 2020
    ...83. The Court needs to consider in what way the inducements offered would affect the reliability of the confession. [73] In R v Ledesma, 2020 ABQB 117 [Ledesma 2020], Justice Gates concluded that the accused’s confessions were not as a result of any inducements that rose to the level of coe......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT