R v Lewis, 2019 ABCA 311
| Judge | Watson,Wakeling,Khullar |
| Citation | 2019 ABCA 311 |
| Date | 26 August 2019 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Alberta) |
| Docket Number | 1803-0134-A |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
10 practice notes
-
R v K.D.S.,
...para 13, leave to appeal to Que CA refused, 2020 QCCA 1414; R v Bacon, 2020 BCCA 140 at para 43, 386 CCC (3d) 256; R v Lewis, 2019 ABCA 311 at para 6 [Lewis], 443 CRR (2d) 42; Théodore c Savard-Déry, 2019 QCCS 1765 at para 37; Martel-Poliquin c R, 2018 QCCA 193......
-
Auer v Auer,
...proceed on a wrong perception of what the law is, the court is not only entitled, but obliged, to raise the point of law: R v Lewis, 2019 ABCA 311 at paras 10-11, citing CUSA v Tao Ying Metal Industries and Others, [2008] ZACC 15 at para 68 (S Afr Const Ct). Further, a reviewing judgeȁ......
-
R. v. JOBB,
...2897 at para 13, leave to appeal to Que CA refused, 2020 QCCA 1414; R v Bacon, 2020 BCCA 140 at para 43, 386 CCC (3d) 256; R v Lewis, 2019 ABCA 311 at para 6 [Lewis], 443 CRR (2d) 42; Théodore c Savard-Déry, 2019 QCCS 1765 at para 37; Martel-Poliquin c R, 2018 QCCA 1931 at paras 1......
-
R v Hermkens & Moran,
...inducement, the quid pro quo, was sufficient to overbear the will of the individual: Oickle at para 57; Lavallee at para 27; R v Lewis, 2019 ABCA 311 at para 15; Fernandes at para 26; Spencer at para 15. Inducements may produce “coerced-compliant” or “coerced-persuaded&......
Request a trial to view additional results
9 cases
-
R v K.D.S.,
...para 13, leave to appeal to Que CA refused, 2020 QCCA 1414; R v Bacon, 2020 BCCA 140 at para 43, 386 CCC (3d) 256; R v Lewis, 2019 ABCA 311 at para 6 [Lewis], 443 CRR (2d) 42; Théodore c Savard-Déry, 2019 QCCS 1765 at para 37; Martel-Poliquin c R, 2018 QCCA 193......
-
Auer v Auer,
...proceed on a wrong perception of what the law is, the court is not only entitled, but obliged, to raise the point of law: R v Lewis, 2019 ABCA 311 at paras 10-11, citing CUSA v Tao Ying Metal Industries and Others, [2008] ZACC 15 at para 68 (S Afr Const Ct). Further, a reviewing judgeȁ......
-
R. v. JOBB,
...2897 at para 13, leave to appeal to Que CA refused, 2020 QCCA 1414; R v Bacon, 2020 BCCA 140 at para 43, 386 CCC (3d) 256; R v Lewis, 2019 ABCA 311 at para 6 [Lewis], 443 CRR (2d) 42; Théodore c Savard-Déry, 2019 QCCS 1765 at para 37; Martel-Poliquin c R, 2018 QCCA 1931 at paras 1......
-
R v Hermkens & Moran,
...inducement, the quid pro quo, was sufficient to overbear the will of the individual: Oickle at para 57; Lavallee at para 27; R v Lewis, 2019 ABCA 311 at para 15; Fernandes at para 26; Spencer at para 15. Inducements may produce “coerced-compliant” or “coerced-persuaded&......
Request a trial to view additional results