R. v. Liard (M.) et al.

JurisdictionOntario
CourtSuperior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
JudgeCorbett, J.
Citation[2013] O.T.C. Uned. 5457,2013 ONSC 5457,[2013] O.T.C. Uned. 5457 (SC)
Date30 August 2013
Subject MatterPRACTICE,EVIDENCE,CRIMINAL LAW

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
20 practice notes
  • Conflict of Interest
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Ethics and Criminal Law. Second Edition
    • June 19, 2015
    ...that independent counsel be retained to conduct the cross-examination. 163 See Charles , above note 159 at paras 26–37; R v Liard , 2013 ONSC 5457 at paras 407–13 [ Liard ]. 164 R v Leduc (2003), 176 CCC (3d) 321 at paras 132–34 (Ont CA) [ Leduc ]. 165 See ibid at para 132. 166 See ibid at ......
  • Practical and Ethical Considerations in Witness Preparation
    • Canada
    • Criminal Law Series Witness Preparation, Presentation and Assessment Part I
    • May 3, 2023
    ...Act, 1982 , being Schedule B to the Canada Act 1982 (UK), 1982, c 11 [Charter]. 8 R v Regan , 2002 SCC 12 at paras 84-86. 9 R v Laird , 2013 ONSC 5457 at para 424. 10 R v Trought , 2019 ONSC 1421 at para 18. 11 R v Browne , 2016 CanLII 106224 at para 12 (Ont Sup Ct J). Copyright © 2023 Emon......
  • Charter Issues in Drug Cases
    • Canada
    • Criminal Law Series Prosecuting and Defending Drug Cases, 2nd Edition
    • May 3, 2024
    ...in great detail the prongs of attack being proposed. 83 81 See Pires; Lising , supra note 61 at paras 3, 36. 82 R v Liard and Lasota , 2013 ONSC 5457 at paras 424-26. 83 While courts have not gone so far as to make a blanket ruling prohibiting the prosecutor from showing the opposing factum......
  • Table of cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Ethics and Criminal Law. Second Edition
    • June 19, 2015
    ...to SCC refused, [2013] SCCA No 142 .................................................................................... 506 R v Liard, 2013 ONSC 5457................................................................ 302, 402, 407 R v Liew, [1999] 3 SCR 227, 137 CCC (3d) 353, 1999 CanLII 658 .......
  • Get Started for Free
9 cases
  • R. v. Suarez-Noa
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Ontario)
    • July 28, 2017
    ...166 C.C.C. (3d) 190 (Ont. C.A.), at paras. 66-67; R. v. Rogers (2005), 198 C.C.C. (3d) 449 (B.C.C.A.), at para. 79; and R. v. Liard, 2013 ONSC 5457, at paras. 363-77. Ms. Pringle, counsel for Mr. Suarez-Noa, persuasively argued that even if Dr. Gojer’s opinion concerning Mr. Suarez-Noa’s me......
  • R. v. Calnen (P.T.)
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of Nova Scotia (Canada)
    • November 16, 2015
    ...v. Reid (W.J.) (2003), 167 O.A.C. 336; 2003 CanLII 14779 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 18]. R. v. Liard (M.) et al., [2013] O.T.C. Uned. 5457; 2013 ONSC 5457, refd to. [para. R. v. Mohan, [1994] 2 S.C.R. 9; 166 N.R. 245; 71 O.A.C. 241, refd to. [para. 21]. R. v. Abbey (W.N.) (2009), 254 O.A.C. 9;......
  • R v. Schols
    • Canada
    • Provincial Court of Alberta (Canada)
    • April 17, 2025
    ...witness preparation is, on its own, somehow improper has not been accepted in the jurisprudence: see, for example, R v Liard and Lasota, 2013 ONSC 5457 at para 424; R v Trought, 2019 ONSC 1421 at para 18; and R v Browne, 2016 CanLII 106224 (ONSC) at para 12. In R v LRS, 2016 ABCA 307 [LRS],......
  • R. v. Allred
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Ontario)
    • April 10, 2026
    ...v. Wills, 2006 CanLII 31909 (Ont. S.C.); R. v. M.T., 2009 CanLII 43426 (Ont. S.C.); R. v. Davis, 2011 ONSC 5567; R. v. Liard and Lasota, 2013 ONSC 5457; and R. v. Lewis, 2024 ONSC 5261. Examples of applications denied include: R. v. Vickerson, 2006 CanLII 2409 (Ont. S.C.); R. v. Minoose, 20......
  • Get Started for Free
10 books & journal articles
  • Conflict of Interest
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Ethics and Criminal Law. Second Edition
    • June 19, 2015
    ...that independent counsel be retained to conduct the cross-examination. 163 See Charles , above note 159 at paras 26–37; R v Liard , 2013 ONSC 5457 at paras 407–13 [ Liard ]. 164 R v Leduc (2003), 176 CCC (3d) 321 at paras 132–34 (Ont CA) [ Leduc ]. 165 See ibid at para 132. 166 See ibid at ......
  • Practical and Ethical Considerations in Witness Preparation
    • Canada
    • Criminal Law Series Witness Preparation, Presentation and Assessment Part I
    • May 3, 2023
    ...Act, 1982 , being Schedule B to the Canada Act 1982 (UK), 1982, c 11 [Charter]. 8 R v Regan , 2002 SCC 12 at paras 84-86. 9 R v Laird , 2013 ONSC 5457 at para 424. 10 R v Trought , 2019 ONSC 1421 at para 18. 11 R v Browne , 2016 CanLII 106224 at para 12 (Ont Sup Ct J). Copyright © 2023 Emon......
  • Charter Issues in Drug Cases
    • Canada
    • Criminal Law Series Prosecuting and Defending Drug Cases, 2nd Edition
    • May 3, 2024
    ...in great detail the prongs of attack being proposed. 83 81 See Pires; Lising , supra note 61 at paras 3, 36. 82 R v Liard and Lasota , 2013 ONSC 5457 at paras 424-26. 83 While courts have not gone so far as to make a blanket ruling prohibiting the prosecutor from showing the opposing factum......
  • Table of cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Ethics and Criminal Law. Second Edition
    • June 19, 2015
    ...to SCC refused, [2013] SCCA No 142 .................................................................................... 506 R v Liard, 2013 ONSC 5457................................................................ 302, 402, 407 R v Liew, [1999] 3 SCR 227, 137 CCC (3d) 353, 1999 CanLII 658 .......
  • Get Started for Free