R. v. Lilly, (1983) 24 Sask.R. 50 (SCC)
| Judge | Dickson, Beetz, Estey, McIntyre, Chouinard, Lamer and Wilson, JJ. |
| Court | Supreme Court (Canada) |
| Case Date | June 23, 1983 |
| Jurisdiction | Canada (Federal) |
| Citations | (1983), 24 Sask.R. 50 (SCC);[1983] 1 SCR 794;147 DLR (3d) 758;1983 CanLII 153 (SCC);5 CCC (3d) 1;24 Sask R 50 |
R. v. Lilly (1983), 24 Sask.R. 50 (SCC)
MLB headnote and full text
R. v. Lilly
Indexed As: R. v. Lilly
Supreme Court of Canada
Dickson, Beetz, Estey, McIntyre, Chouinard, Lamer and Wilson, JJ.
June 23, 1983.
Summary:
The accused was charged and convicted of the theft of trust monies. The accused appealed to the Saskatchewan Court of Appeal.
The Saskatchewan Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal. The accused appealed to the Supreme Court of Canada. The Supreme Court of Canada allowed the appeal and ordered a new trial.
Criminal Law - Topic 1657
Theft - Jury charge, defences, taking with colour of right - The Supreme Court of Canada referred to the proper jury charge respecting a defence of taking with colour of right (see paragraph 10).
Counsel:
Peter Foley, for the appellant;
Audrey Brent, for the respondent.
This appeal was heard by DICKSON, BEETZ, ESTEY, McINTYRE, CHOUINARD, LAMER and WILSON, JJ., of the Supreme Court of Canada at Ottawa, Ontario on December 15 and 16, 1982.
The judgment of the Supreme Court of Canada was delivered by LAMER, J., on June 23, 1983.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Table of Cases
...Libman v The Queen, [1985] 2 SCR 178 .............................................................209 Lilly v The Queen, [1983] 1 SCR 794 .................................................................. 283 Lumen Inc v Canada (AG) (1997), 119 CCC (3d) 91 (Que CA) ...............................
-
Table of cases
...58 R v Lights, 2020 ONCA 102 ........................................................................417, 599 R v Lilly, [1983] 1 SCR 794, 5 CCC (3d) 1, [1983] SCJ No 57 .....117, 118, 220, 519 R v Lima, 2017 SKCA 108 ...............................................................................
-
Table of cases
...1, [1997] SCJ No 77................... 529 R v Light (1993), 21 BCAC 241, 78 CCC (3d) 221, [1993] BCJ No 4 (CA) ...........51 R v Lilly, [1983] 1 SCR 794, 5 CCC (3d) 1, [1983] SCJ No 57 ................... 487, 505 R v Lim (No 2) (1990), 1 CRR (2d) 136, [1990] OJ No 3261 (HCJ) ...................
-
The Prohibited Act, or Actus Reus
...(1954), 110 CCC 97 (SCC); R v Howson , [1966] 3 CCC 348 (Ont CA); R v Spot Supermarket Inc (1979), 50 CCC (2d) 239 (Que CA); R v Lilly , [1983] 1 SCR 794 [ Lilly ]. Section 429 provides that no person shall be convicted of property ofences under ss 439–46 including mischief, arson, and crue......
-
Harding v. Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (Newfoundland and Labrador), (2000) 195 Nfld. & P.E.I.R. 228 (NFTD)
...to. [para. 17]. R. v. G.L.M. (1999), 128 B.C.A.C. 102; 208 W.A.C. 102; 138 C.C.C.(3d) 383 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 18]. R. v. Lilly, [1983] 1 S.C.R. 794; 48 N.R. 140; 24 Sask.R. 50, refd to. [para. R. v. C.R.B. (1990), 107 N.R. 241; 109 A.R. 81; 55 C.C.C.(3d) 1 (S.C.C.), refd to. [para. 38].......
-
R. v. G.L.M., 1999 BCCA 467
...435 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 12]. R. v. D.A.L. (1996), 76 B.C.A.C. 65; 125 W.A.C. 65 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 12]. R. v. Lilly, [1983] 1 S.C.R. 794; 48 N.R. 140; 24 Sask.R. 50, refd to. [para. R. v. Brown (1984), 79 Cr. App. Rep. 115 (C.A.), not appld. [para. 16]. R. v. Agbim, [1979] Crim. L.......
-
R. v. Singleton (M.K.), 2010 BCSC 1734
...fact. 17 Since Demarco was decided, the Supreme Court of Canada has dealt with the "colour of right" issue in two cases: R. v. Lilly , [1983] 1 S.C.R. 794 (S.C.C.); and R. v. Jones , [1991] 3 S.C.R. 110 (S.C.C.). Nothing said in the judgments in either of those cases in any way detracts fro......
-
R. v. Hawrish (E.A.), (1993) 113 Sask.R. 214 (CA)
...25]. R. v. P.L.S., [1991] 1 S.C.R. 909; 122 N.R. 321; 90 Nfld. & P.E.I.R. 234; 280 A.P.R. 234, refd to. [para. 25]. R. v. Lilly, [1983] 1 S.C.R. 794; 48 N.R. 140, refd to. [para. R. v. Théroux, [1993] 2 S.C.R. 5; 151 N.R. 104; 54 Q.A.C. 184, refd to. [para. 86]. R. v. Zlatic, [1993] 2 S......
-
Table of Cases
...Libman v The Queen, [1985] 2 SCR 178 .............................................................209 Lilly v The Queen, [1983] 1 SCR 794 .................................................................. 283 Lumen Inc v Canada (AG) (1997), 119 CCC (3d) 91 (Que CA) ...............................
-
Table of cases
...58 R v Lights, 2020 ONCA 102 ........................................................................417, 599 R v Lilly, [1983] 1 SCR 794, 5 CCC (3d) 1, [1983] SCJ No 57 .....117, 118, 220, 519 R v Lima, 2017 SKCA 108 ...............................................................................
-
Table of cases
...1, [1997] SCJ No 77................... 529 R v Light (1993), 21 BCAC 241, 78 CCC (3d) 221, [1993] BCJ No 4 (CA) ...........51 R v Lilly, [1983] 1 SCR 794, 5 CCC (3d) 1, [1983] SCJ No 57 ................... 487, 505 R v Lim (No 2) (1990), 1 CRR (2d) 136, [1990] OJ No 3261 (HCJ) ...................
-
The Prohibited Act, or Actus Reus
...(1954), 110 CCC 97 (SCC); R v Howson , [1966] 3 CCC 348 (Ont CA); R v Spot Supermarket Inc (1979), 50 CCC (2d) 239 (Que CA); R v Lilly , [1983] 1 SCR 794 [ Lilly ]. Section 429 provides that no person shall be convicted of property ofences under ss 439–46 including mischief, arson, and crue......