R. v. Lis, 2020 ONCA 551

JurisdictionOntario
JudgeWatt, Harvison Young and Coroza JJ.A.
Citation2020 ONCA 551
Date03 September 2020
CourtCourt of Appeal (Ontario)
Docket NumberC67405
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
17 practice notes
  • R v Al Aazawi, 2022 ABCA 361
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • 8 November 2022
    ...sentences was restricted to child sexual offences or to offences where Parliament had increased the maximum penalty, citing R v Lis, 2020 ONCA 551: Reasons for Sentence at para 103.  [38]           The sentencing judge determined that t......
  • R. v. Mix, 2022 PESC 17
    • Canada
    • Provincial Court of Alberta (Canada)
    • 20 April 2022
    ...Criminal Code of Canada, R.S.C. 1985, c. C-46.   CASES CONSIDERED: R. v. Sark, 2020 PECA 9; R. v. Lacasse, 2015 SCC 64; R. v. Lis, 2020 ONCA 551; R. v. Friesen, 2020 SCC 9; R. v. Downes, 2006 CanLII 3957 (ON CA); R. v. Knockwood, 2009 NSCA 98; R. v. C.C., 2021 ONCA 600; R. v. Irvine, 2......
  • R. v. Collier, 2021 ONSC 6827
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • 15 October 2021
    ...demonstrates its intention that the offence be punished more harshly: Lacasse, at para. 7; Friesen, at paras. 96-97; R. v. Lis, 2020 ONCA 551 at para. 49.   Thus, as noted in Friesen, at para. 100, to respect Parliament’s decision to increase maximum sentences, courts ......
  • R v TCF, 2022 ABKB 643
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • 29 September 2022
    ...sentencing objectives with respect to major sexual assaults. However, this does not mean that other factors are ignored. In R v Lis, 2020 ONCA 551 Justice Watt stated at paras By enacting s. 718.01, Parliament prioritized denunciation and deterrence for offences that involve abuse of childr......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
15 cases
  • R v Al Aazawi,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • 8 November 2022
    ...sentences was restricted to child sexual offences or to offences where Parliament had increased the maximum penalty, citing R v Lis, 2020 ONCA 551: Reasons for Sentence at para 103.  [38]           The sentencing judge determined that t......
  • R. v. Mix,
    • Canada
    • Alberta Court of Justice
    • 20 April 2022
    ...Criminal Code of Canada, R.S.C. 1985, c. C-46.   CASES CONSIDERED: R. v. Sark, 2020 PECA 9; R. v. Lacasse, 2015 SCC 64; R. v. Lis, 2020 ONCA 551; R. v. Friesen, 2020 SCC 9; R. v. Downes, 2006 CanLII 3957 (ON CA); R. v. Knockwood, 2009 NSCA 98; R. v. C.C., 2021 ONCA 600; R. v. Irvine, 2......
  • R. v. Collier,
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • 15 October 2021
    ...demonstrates its intention that the offence be punished more harshly: Lacasse, at para. 7; Friesen, at paras. 96-97; R. v. Lis, 2020 ONCA 551 at para. 49.   Thus, as noted in Friesen, at para. 100, to respect Parliament’s decision to increase maximum sentences, courts ......
  • R v Amaaq, 2020 NUCA 11
    • Canada
    • Nunavut Court of Appeal (Canada)
    • 21 October 2020
    ...Code, including mandatory minimums, they have stayed the execution of the post-appeal portion of the sentence”) & The Queen v. Lis, 2020 ONCA 551, ¶ 101 (“The Crown asks us not to reincarcerate the respondent. I would stay the execution of the 19 month remanet of the [21] The Queen v. L......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT