R. v. Lockrem (L.G.), [2004] Yukon Cases (TerrCt) 26

JudgeLilles, C.J.T.C.
CourtTerritorial Court of Yukon (Canada)
Case DateApril 27, 2004
JurisdictionYukon
Citations[2004] Yukon Cases (TerrCt) 26;2004 YKTC 26

R. v. Lockrem (L.G.), [2004] Yukon Cases (TerrCt) 26

MLB headnote and full text

Temp. Cite: [2004] Yukon Cases TBEd. MY.093

Regina v. Larry George Lockrem

(03-11039; 2004 YKTC 26)

Indexed As: R. v. Lockrem (L.G.)

Yukon Territorial Court

Dawson City

Lilles, C.J.T.C.

April 27, 2004.

Summary:

This headnote contains no summary.

Civil Rights - Topic 1409

Security of the person - Law enforcement - Motor vehicles - See paragraphs 1 to 16.

Police - Topic 3063

Powers - Arrest and detention - Without warrant - Reasonable and probable grounds - See paragraphs 1 to 16.

Cases Noticed:

R. v. Therens, [1985] 1 S.C.R. 613; 59 N.R. 122; 40 Sask.R. 122, refd to. [para. 8].

R. v. Johnson (E.) (2000), 138 B.C.A.C. 190; 226 W.A.C. 190 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 8].

R. v. Storrey, [1990] 1 S.C.R. 241; 105 N.R. 81; 37 O.A.C. 161, refd to. [para. 10].

R. v. Caslake (T.L.), [1998] 1 S.C.R. 51; 221 N.R. 281; 123 Man.R.(2d) 208; 159 W.A.C. 208, refd to. [para. 11].

People v. Hilber (1978), 269 N.W.2d 159 (Mich. S.C.), refd to. [para. 12].

R. v. Huebschwerlen, [1997] Y.J. No. 24 (Yuk. Terr. Ct.), refd to. [para. 12].

R. v. Polashek (P.K.) (1999), 118 O.A.C. 312; 45 O.R.(3d) 434 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 13].

R. v. Omelusik (T.Y.) (2003), 182 B.C.A.C. 315; 300 W.A.C. 315 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 13].

R. v. Stansfeld (A.P.), [2003] B.C.T.C. 1994 (S.C.), refd to. [para. 13].

Counsel:

Michael Cozens, for the Crown;

Elaine Cairns, for the defence.

This action was heard by Lilles, C.J.T.C., of the Yukon Territorial Court, who released the following decision on April 27, 2004.

Please note: The following judgment has not been edited.

To continue reading

Request your trial
1 practice notes
  • R. v. Ashby (J.J.), 2011 BCSC 513
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 21 April 2011
    ...the very strong odour of raw marihuana was an observation that the crime of possession of marihuana was being committed. R. v. Lockrem , 2004 YKTC 26, [2004] Y.J. No. 28 [81] In this case an officer making a traffic stop for failure to wear a seatbelt detected a strong smell of freshly burn......
1 cases
  • R. v. Ashby (J.J.), 2011 BCSC 513
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 21 April 2011
    ...the very strong odour of raw marihuana was an observation that the crime of possession of marihuana was being committed. R. v. Lockrem , 2004 YKTC 26, [2004] Y.J. No. 28 [81] In this case an officer making a traffic stop for failure to wear a seatbelt detected a strong smell of freshly burn......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT