R v Lugela, 2020 ABCA 348
| Judge | The Honourable Madam Justice Marina Paperny,The Honourable Madam Justice Elizabeth Hughes,The Honourable Madam Justice Dawn Pentelechuk |
| Citation | 2020 ABCA 348 |
| Docket Number | 1901-0190-A |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Alberta) |
| Date | 30 September 2020 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
7 practice notes
-
R v Hermkens, 2021 ABQB 1016
...application of the excited utterance, spontaneous declaration, or, as it is sometimes called, the res gestae doctrine. See R v Lugela, 2020 ABCA 348 at paras 34-35, 39-40. However, it was clear that even were it found that Cst. Lush accurately heard and recalled what Ms. Hart said, there wa......
-
R v Lugela,
...intoxication as a mitigating factor. In his reasons for conviction (R v Lugela, 2019 ABQB 128; appeal dismissed R v Lugela, 2020 ABCA 348) the trial judge rejected the Appellant’s defence that he was in a state of “advanced” intoxication at the time he murdered Mylan Hi......
-
R v SY,
...See also, for example, cases on identification such as R v Cardinal, 2010 ABPC 175, R v Lugela, 2020 ABCA 348, R v Letendre, 2019 ABCA 179, and R v McKee, 2015 ABPC 166. Decision [48] Accordingly, after considering all the evidence......
-
R v Palmer,
...a verdict must consider the evidence in its totality rather than in a piecemeal fashion: R v Anny, 2021 ABCA 394 at para 57; R v Lugela, 2020 ABCA 348 at para [32] The consideration and application of Villaroman does not arise when......
Request a trial to view additional results
7 cases
-
R v Hermkens, 2021 ABQB 1016
...application of the excited utterance, spontaneous declaration, or, as it is sometimes called, the res gestae doctrine. See R v Lugela, 2020 ABCA 348 at paras 34-35, 39-40. However, it was clear that even were it found that Cst. Lush accurately heard and recalled what Ms. Hart said, there wa......
-
R v Lugela,
...intoxication as a mitigating factor. In his reasons for conviction (R v Lugela, 2019 ABQB 128; appeal dismissed R v Lugela, 2020 ABCA 348) the trial judge rejected the Appellant’s defence that he was in a state of “advanced” intoxication at the time he murdered Mylan Hi......
-
R v SY,
...See also, for example, cases on identification such as R v Cardinal, 2010 ABPC 175, R v Lugela, 2020 ABCA 348, R v Letendre, 2019 ABCA 179, and R v McKee, 2015 ABPC 166. Decision [48] Accordingly, after considering all the evidence......
-
R v Palmer,
...a verdict must consider the evidence in its totality rather than in a piecemeal fashion: R v Anny, 2021 ABCA 394 at para 57; R v Lugela, 2020 ABCA 348 at para [32] The consideration and application of Villaroman does not arise when......
Request a trial to view additional results