R v Lundrigan, 2020 ABCA 281
| Judge | The Honourable Mr. Justice Brian O’Ferrall,The Honourable Mr. Justice Thomas W. Wakeling,The Honourable Mr. Justice Kevin Feehan |
| Citation | 2020 ABCA 281 |
| Docket Number | 1801-0011A |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Alberta) |
| Date | 28 July 2020 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
8 practice notes
-
R v Mavros,
...leave den [1997] SCCA No 248; R v Tokaryk, 2019 ABCA 439, paras 20-23; R v Hobbs, 2020 ABCA 156, paras 22-23, 31; R v Lundrigan, 2020 ABCA 281, paras New Evidence [22] Mr Mavros asserts that his counsel was incompetent and did not follow his i......
-
R v McKechnie,
...303, para 26, 92 Alta LR (6th) 27, 33; R v GDB, 2000 SCC 22, para 26, [2000] 1 SCR 520; R v Hobbs, 2020 ABCA 156, para 31; R v Lundrigan, 2020 ABCA 281, para 64. [19] The competence of counsel is assessed against a reasonableness standard and there ......
-
R. v. Mehl,
...ill-suited to appellate review: R. v. Dunbar, 2003 BCCA 667 at paras. 29, 32; Joanisse at paras. 66–68; R. v. Lundrigan, 2020 ABCA 281 at para. 70. They include assessment of: the strength of the Crown’s case; the impact defence evidence has had on the jury, or is likely to ha......
-
R v Sidhu,
...22, para 26, [2000] 1 SCR 520; R v Sewak, 2019 ABCA 303, para 26, 92 Alta LR (6th) 27; R v Hobbs, 2020 ABCA 156, para 31; R v Lundrigan, 2020 ABCA 281, paras 64-66, 11 Alta LR (7th) 309; R v Sauverwald, 2020 ABCA 388, para [34] An appellant who challenges the reliability of a verdict must s......
Request a trial to view additional results
8 cases
-
R v Mavros,
...leave den [1997] SCCA No 248; R v Tokaryk, 2019 ABCA 439, paras 20-23; R v Hobbs, 2020 ABCA 156, paras 22-23, 31; R v Lundrigan, 2020 ABCA 281, paras New Evidence [22] Mr Mavros asserts that his counsel was incompetent and did not follow his i......
-
R. v. Mehl,
...ill-suited to appellate review: R. v. Dunbar, 2003 BCCA 667 at paras. 29, 32; Joanisse at paras. 66–68; R. v. Lundrigan, 2020 ABCA 281 at para. 70. They include assessment of: the strength of the Crown’s case; the impact defence evidence has had on the jury, or is likely to ha......
-
R v McKechnie,
...303, para 26, 92 Alta LR (6th) 27, 33; R v GDB, 2000 SCC 22, para 26, [2000] 1 SCR 520; R v Hobbs, 2020 ABCA 156, para 31; R v Lundrigan, 2020 ABCA 281, para 64. [19] The competence of counsel is assessed against a reasonableness standard and there ......
-
R v Sidhu,
...22, para 26, [2000] 1 SCR 520; R v Sewak, 2019 ABCA 303, para 26, 92 Alta LR (6th) 27; R v Hobbs, 2020 ABCA 156, para 31; R v Lundrigan, 2020 ABCA 281, paras 64-66, 11 Alta LR (7th) 309; R v Sauverwald, 2020 ABCA 388, para [34] An appellant who challenges the reliability of a verdict must s......
Request a trial to view additional results