R. v. A.M., 2020 ONSC 7674
| Jurisdiction | Ontario |
| Judge | CHRISTIE J. |
| Date | 10 December 2020 |
| Docket Number | CR-18-04996-0000 |
| Court | Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada) |
| Citation | 2020 ONSC 7674 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
3 practice notes
-
R. v. A.M.,
...was required in accordance with s. 109 of the CJA, however, notice was not required to be served on the complainant. See: R. v. A.M., 2020 ONSC 7674 17) The notice of constitutional question was subsequently served. The Attorney General of Canada and Ontario did not become directly involved......
-
R. v. Gerrond,
...the accused serve and file a Notice of Constitutional Question in keeping with the rules. An identical view was expressed in R. v. A.M., 2020 ONSC 7674. [16] Furthermore, the Crown asserts that in R. v. Sullivan, 2020 ONCA 333, the Court of Appeal h......
-
R. v. Navaratnam,
...and (3) are constitutional, not following R. v. Reddick but instead cases such as R. v. Bickford, 2020 ONSC 7510, and R. v. A.M., 2020 ONSC 7674; 2020 ONSC 8061, such a determination would be, at its highest, an error of law. It is unnecessary to opine here as to whether there was an error ......
3 cases
-
R. v. A.M.,
...was required in accordance with s. 109 of the CJA, however, notice was not required to be served on the complainant. See: R. v. A.M., 2020 ONSC 7674 17) The notice of constitutional question was subsequently served. The Attorney General of Canada and Ontario did not become directly involved......
-
R. v. Gerrond,
...the accused serve and file a Notice of Constitutional Question in keeping with the rules. An identical view was expressed in R. v. A.M., 2020 ONSC 7674. [16] Furthermore, the Crown asserts that in R. v. Sullivan, 2020 ONCA 333, the Court of Appeal h......
-
R. v. Navaratnam,
...and (3) are constitutional, not following R. v. Reddick but instead cases such as R. v. Bickford, 2020 ONSC 7510, and R. v. A.M., 2020 ONSC 7674; 2020 ONSC 8061, such a determination would be, at its highest, an error of law. It is unnecessary to opine here as to whether there was an error ......