R. v. MacKinnon,
| Jurisdiction | Ontario |
| Judge | MacPherson,Paciocco,Thorburn |
| Docket Number | C67958 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Ontario) |
| Date | 22 November 2022 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
2 practice notes
-
Rizzuto v. Hamilton Wentworth Catholic District School Board,
...cross-examination, cannot be observed by the trier of fact, and did not testify under oath when giving the statement: R. v. MacKinnon, 2022 ONCA 811, para 30, citing R. v. Bradshaw, 2017 SCC 35, [2017] 1 SCR 865 para. 20. It is even more difficult when the person who gave the statement is n......
-
R v Desjarlais,
...under the spontaneous utterance exception, such as gross intoxication or exceptionally difficult viewing conditions: see R v MacKinnon, 2022 ONCA 811 at paras 44-47, leave to appeal to SCC refused, 40581 (June 22, 2023). However, those factors inform my determination of the probative value ......
2 cases
-
Rizzuto v. Hamilton Wentworth Catholic District School Board,
...cross-examination, cannot be observed by the trier of fact, and did not testify under oath when giving the statement: R. v. MacKinnon, 2022 ONCA 811, para 30, citing R. v. Bradshaw, 2017 SCC 35, [2017] 1 SCR 865 para. 20. It is even more difficult when the person who gave the statement is n......
-
R v Desjarlais,
...under the spontaneous utterance exception, such as gross intoxication or exceptionally difficult viewing conditions: see R v MacKinnon, 2022 ONCA 811 at paras 44-47, leave to appeal to SCC refused, 40581 (June 22, 2023). However, those factors inform my determination of the probative value ......