R. v. MacMillan, 2020 ONCA 141
| Jurisdiction | Ontario |
| Judge | MacPherson J.A. |
| Citation | 2020 ONCA 141 |
| Date | 19 February 2020 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Ontario) |
| Docket Number | M51246; C67940 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 practice notes
-
Court Of Appeal Summaries (February 17 February 21, 2020)
...133 Keywords: Criminal Law, Domestic Violence, Assault Causing Bodily Harm, Sentencing, Propensity Evidence R. v. M. (Publication Ban), 2020 ONCA 141 Keywords: Publication Ban, Criminal Law, Sexual Assault, Administering a Noxious Substance, Bail Pending Appeal, Jury Selection, Peremptory C......
-
R v Perrault, 2020 SKCA 35
...sufficient evidence to persuade a panel of the Court that the Crown had a strong case, it is not clear it would agree. In R v MacMillan, 2020 ONCA 141 [MacMillan], MacPherson J.A. considered an application for bail pending appeal. The principal ground of appeal was that the trial judge had ......
-
R. v. Sousa, 2020 ONCA 432
...[14] The relevant temporal factors are the same in this case as in Chouhan. [15] This same issue was addressed in R. v. MacMillan, 2020 ONCA 141. In that case, Macpherson J.A. held that “[t]his argument is far removed from being frivolous. Indeed it is almost the opposite; it is almost cert......
-
R v. Chizanga and Meredith, 2020 ONSC 2749
...in all probability, it was reversible error not to follow the old law and to afford counsel peremptory challenges: see R. v. MacMillan, 2020 ONCA 141 at para. [4] As a consequence of what appears on its face to be fatal error, the applicants reques......
3 cases
-
R v Perrault, 2020 SKCA 35
...sufficient evidence to persuade a panel of the Court that the Crown had a strong case, it is not clear it would agree. In R v MacMillan, 2020 ONCA 141 [MacMillan], MacPherson J.A. considered an application for bail pending appeal. The principal ground of appeal was that the trial judge had ......
-
R. v. Sousa, 2020 ONCA 432
...[14] The relevant temporal factors are the same in this case as in Chouhan. [15] This same issue was addressed in R. v. MacMillan, 2020 ONCA 141. In that case, Macpherson J.A. held that “[t]his argument is far removed from being frivolous. Indeed it is almost the opposite; it is almost cert......
-
R v. Chizanga and Meredith, 2020 ONSC 2749
...in all probability, it was reversible error not to follow the old law and to afford counsel peremptory challenges: see R. v. MacMillan, 2020 ONCA 141 at para. [4] As a consequence of what appears on its face to be fatal error, the applicants reques......
1 firm's commentaries
-
Court Of Appeal Summaries (February 17 February 21, 2020)
...133 Keywords: Criminal Law, Domestic Violence, Assault Causing Bodily Harm, Sentencing, Propensity Evidence R. v. M. (Publication Ban), 2020 ONCA 141 Keywords: Publication Ban, Criminal Law, Sexual Assault, Administering a Noxious Substance, Bail Pending Appeal, Jury Selection, Peremptory C......