R. v. Malmo-Levine; R. v. Caine, 2003 SCC 74
| Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
| Judge | McLachlin, Beverley; Gonthier, Charles Doherty; Iacobucci, Frank; Major, John C.; Bastarache, Michel; Binnie, William Ian Corneil; Arbour, Louise; LeBel, Louis; Deschamps, Marie |
| Citation | 2003 SCC 74,[2003] 3 SCR 571,[2004] 4 WWR 407,179 CCC (3d) 417,AZ-50212212,114 CRR (2d) 189,16 CR (6th) 1,314 WAC 1,314 NR 1,233 DLR (4th) 415,23 BCLR (4th) 1,[2003] CarswellBC 3133,JE 2004-131,59 WCB (2d) 116,191 BCAC 1,[2003] SCJ No 79 (QL) |
| Date | 23 December 2003 |
| Court | Supreme Court (Canada) |
| Docket Number | 28026, 28148 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
192 practice notes
-
R v SLW, 2018 ABCA 235
...that the sentence... must be... proportionate to the seriousness of the offence”); The Queen v. Malmo-Levine, 2003 SCC 74, ¶163; [2003] 3 S.C.R. 571, 651 (“Parliament has made the idea of proportionality central to the principles of sentencing”); The Queen v. Proulx, 2000 SCC 5, ¶82; [2000]......
-
Harkat (Re),
...[2001] 2 S.C.R. 281, 200 D.L.R. (4th) 193, 36 Admin. L.R. (3d) 71; R. v. Malmo-Levine; R. v. Caine, 2003 SCC 74, [2003] 3 S.C.R. 571, 233 D.L.R. (4th) 415, [2004] 4 W.W.R. 407; Dehghani v. Canada (Minister of Employment and Immigration), [1993] 1 S.C.R. 1053, (1993), 101 D.L.R. (4th) 654, 1......
-
Section 83.28 of the Criminal, (2004) 199 B.C.A.C. 45 (SCC)
...Branch and Levitt, [1995] 2 S.C.R. 3; 180 N.R. 241; 60 B.C.A.C. 1; 99 W.A.C. 1, refd to. [para. 67]. R. v. Malmo-Levine (D.) et al., [2003] 3 S.C.R. 571; 314 N.R. 1; 191 B.C.A.C. 1; 314 W.A.C. 1; 2003 SCC 74, refd to. [para. 68]. Canadian Foundation for Children, Youth and the Law v. Canada......
-
Reference re Assisted Human Reproduction Act, 2010 SCC 61
...Act, [1949] S.C.R. 1; Boggs v. The Queen, [1981] 1 S.C.R. 49; R. v. Wetmore, [1983] 2 S.C.R. 284; R. v. Malmo‑Levine, 2003 SCC 74, [2003] 3 S.C.R. 571; R. v. Butler, [1992] 1 S.C.R. 452; Russell v. The Queen (1882), 7 App. Cas. 829; Schneider v. The Queen, [1982] 2 S.C.R. 112; Morgentaler v......
Get Started for Free
117 cases
-
R v SLW, 2018 ABCA 235
...that the sentence... must be... proportionate to the seriousness of the offence”); The Queen v. Malmo-Levine, 2003 SCC 74, ¶163; [2003] 3 S.C.R. 571, 651 (“Parliament has made the idea of proportionality central to the principles of sentencing”); The Queen v. Proulx, 2000 SCC 5, ¶82; [2000]......
-
Harkat (Re),
...[2001] 2 S.C.R. 281, 200 D.L.R. (4th) 193, 36 Admin. L.R. (3d) 71; R. v. Malmo-Levine; R. v. Caine, 2003 SCC 74, [2003] 3 S.C.R. 571, 233 D.L.R. (4th) 415, [2004] 4 W.W.R. 407; Dehghani v. Canada (Minister of Employment and Immigration), [1993] 1 S.C.R. 1053, (1993), 101 D.L.R. (4th) 654, 1......
-
Section 83.28 of the Criminal, (2004) 199 B.C.A.C. 45 (SCC)
...Branch and Levitt, [1995] 2 S.C.R. 3; 180 N.R. 241; 60 B.C.A.C. 1; 99 W.A.C. 1, refd to. [para. 67]. R. v. Malmo-Levine (D.) et al., [2003] 3 S.C.R. 571; 314 N.R. 1; 191 B.C.A.C. 1; 314 W.A.C. 1; 2003 SCC 74, refd to. [para. 68]. Canadian Foundation for Children, Youth and the Law v. Canada......
-
Reference re Assisted Human Reproduction Act, 2010 SCC 61
...Act, [1949] S.C.R. 1; Boggs v. The Queen, [1981] 1 S.C.R. 49; R. v. Wetmore, [1983] 2 S.C.R. 284; R. v. Malmo‑Levine, 2003 SCC 74, [2003] 3 S.C.R. 571; R. v. Butler, [1992] 1 S.C.R. 452; Russell v. The Queen (1882), 7 App. Cas. 829; Schneider v. The Queen, [1982] 2 S.C.R. 112; Morgentaler v......
Get Started for Free
74 books & journal articles
-
Table of Cases
...452, 453 R. v. Lucas, [1998] 1 S.C.R. 439, 157 D.L.R. (4th) 423, 224 N.R. 161 ................ 453 R. v. Malmo-Levine; R. v. Caine, [2003] 3 S.C.R. 571, 233 D.L.R. (4th) 415, 2003 SCC 74 ........................................................................ 275, 459 R. v. Mara, [1994] O.J......
-
Table of cases
...310 R v MacDonald, 2014 SCC 3 ............................................................................... 240 R v Malmo-Levine, [2003] 3 SCR 571, 233 DLR (4th) 415, 2003 SCC 74 ..........171 R v Marshall (No 1), [1999] 3 SCR 456, 177 DLR (4th) 513, 1999 CanLII 665 ............................
-
Rights in the Criminal Process
...the substantive fairness of laws. There are limits to the degree to which the Charter will affect 26 R v Malmo-Levine; R v Caine , [2003] 3 SCR 571. 27 R v Daviault , [1994] 3 SCR 63, 93 CCC (3d) 21 [ Daviault ]. 28 R v Ruzic , [2001] 1 SCR 687, 153 CCC (3d) 1. Right s in the Criminal Proce......
-
The Criminal Law and the Constitution
...unjustified restriction on freedom of expression. 8 R. v. Hydro–Quebec (1997), 118 C.C.C. (3d) 97 (S.C.C.). 9 R. v. Malmo-Levine (2003), 179 C.C.C. (3d) 417 (S.C.C.) [ Malmo-Levine ]. 10 Reference re Firearms Act (Can.) , [2000] 1 S.C.R. 783 [ Firearms Reference ]. 11 Carter v. Canada (A.G......
Get Started for Free