R. v. Marakah, 2017 SCC 59

JurisdictionFederal Jurisdiction (Canada)
JudgeMcLachlin, Beverley; Abella, Rosalie Silberman; Moldaver, Michael J.; Karakatsanis, Andromache; Gascon, Clément; Côté, Suzanne; Rowe, Malcolm
Citation2017 SCC 59,[2017] 2 SCR 608,142 WCB (2d) 490,[2017] SCJ No 59 (QL)
Date08 December 2017
CourtSupreme Court (Canada)
Docket Number37118
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
296 practice notes
  • Taylor v. Newfoundland and Labrador,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of Newfoundland and Labrador (Canada)
    • September 17, 2020
    ...Workers, Local 832, [1987] 1 S.C.R. 110; R. v. Edwards, [1996] 1 S.C.R. 128; R. v. M. (M.R.), [1998] 3 S.C.R. 393; R. v. Marakah, 2017 SCC 59; R. v. Mann, 2004 SCC 52; R. v. Grant, 2009 SCC 32; Canadian Civil Liberties Assn. v. Canada (Attorney General), 1998 CarswellOnt 2808, 111 O.A.C. 51......
  • R. v. J.J.,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • June 30, 2022
    ...2 S.C.R. 390 ; R. v. Ghomeshi, 2016 ONCJ 155 , 27 C.R. (7th) 17 ; R. v. R.M.R., 2019 BCSC 1093 , 56 C.R. (7th) 414 ; R. v. Marakah, 2017 SCC 59, [2017] 2 S.C.R. 608 ; R. v. Jarvis, 2019 SCC 10 , [2019] 1 S.C.R. 488 ; R. v. M.S., 2019 ONCJ 670 ; R. v. D.L.B., 2020 YKTC 8 , 460 C.R.......
  • Deegan c. Canada (Procureur général),
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • July 22, 2019
    ...(Attorney General), 2001 SCC 88, [2001] 3 S.C.R. 902; R. v. Tessling, 2004 SCC 67, [2004] 3 S.C.R. 432; R. v. Marakah, 2017 SCC 59, [2017] 2 S.C.R. 608; R. v. Mills, 2019 SCC 22, 374 C.C.C. (3d) 423; R. v. Feeney, [1997] 2 S.C.R. 13, &......
  • R. v. Campbell,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • December 6, 2024
    ...must make this assessment having regard to the totality of the circumstances of a given case. The Court’s decision in R. v. Marakah, 2017 SCC 59, [2017] 2 S.C.R. 608 , did not create a categorical rule that all text message conversations or other electronic communications inherently attrac......
  • Get Started for Free
212 cases
  • R. v. J.J.,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • June 30, 2022
    ...2 S.C.R. 390 ; R. v. Ghomeshi, 2016 ONCJ 155 , 27 C.R. (7th) 17 ; R. v. R.M.R., 2019 BCSC 1093 , 56 C.R. (7th) 414 ; R. v. Marakah, 2017 SCC 59, [2017] 2 S.C.R. 608 ; R. v. Jarvis, 2019 SCC 10 , [2019] 1 S.C.R. 488 ; R. v. M.S., 2019 ONCJ 670 ; R. v. D.L.B., 2020 YKTC 8 , 460 C.R.......
  • R. v. Reeves,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • December 13, 2018
    ...(3d) 185 ; R. v. Clarke, 2017 BCCA 453 , 357 C.C.C. (3d) 237 ; R. v. Squires, 2005 NLCA 51 , 199 C.C.C. (3d) 509 ; R. v. Marakah, 2017 SCC 59, [2017] 2 S.C.R. 608 ; R. v. Spencer, 2014 SCC 43 , [2014] 2 S.C.R. 212 ; R. v. Patrick, 2009 SCC 17 , [2009] 1 S.C.R. 579 ; R. v. Ward, 20......
  • York Region District School Board v. Elementary Teachers’ Federation of Ontario,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • June 21, 2024
    ...R. v. Cole, 2012 SCC 53, [2012] 3 S.C.R. 34; referred to: Doré v. Barreau du Québec, 2012 SCC 12, [2012] 1 S.C.R. 395; R. v. Marakah, 2017 SCC 59, [2017] 2 S.C.R 608; R. v. Wong, [1990] 3 S.C.R. 36; R. v. Shepherd, 2009 SCC 35, [2009] 2 S.C.R. 527; Agraira v. Canada (Public Safety and Emerg......
  • R. v. Jones,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • December 8, 2017
    ...; Hunter v. Southam Inc., [1984] 2 S.C.R. 145 ; R. v. Collins, [1987] 1 S.C.R. 265 ; R. v. Wong, [1990] 3 S.C.R. 36 ; R. v. Marakah, 2017 SCC 59, [2017] 2 S.C.R. 608 ; R. v. Patrick, 2009 SCC 17 , [2009] 1 S.C.R. 579 ; R. v. Gauthier, [1977] 1 S.C.R. 441 ; R. v. Jir, 2010 BCCA 497 ,......
  • Get Started for Free
11 firm's commentaries
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (June 20 ' 24, 2022)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • June 27, 2022
    ...l'industrie de la chemise v. Potash, [1994] 2 S.C.R. 406, R. v. Edwards, [1996] 1 S.C.R. 128, R. v. Tessling, 2004 SCC 67, R. v. Marakah, 2017 SCC 59, R. v. A.M., 2008 SCC 19, R. v. Plant, [1993] 3 S.C.R. 281, R. v. Jarvis, 2019 SCC 10, Hunter et al. v. Southam Inc., [1984] 2 S.C.R. 145, Ch......
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (June 10-14)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • July 4, 2019
    ...Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, s. 8, Search and Seizure, s.24(2), Evidence, Admissibility, Exclusion of Evidence, R. v. Marakah, 2017 SCC 59, Text Messages, Onus of Proof, Reverse Onus, R. v. W.(D.), [1991] 1 S.C.R. 742, Reasonable Expectation of Privacy, Appeals, New Issue on App......
  • Ontario Court Of Appeal Summaries (November 12 – 16, 2018)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • November 22, 2018
    ...Ritchie , 2018 ONCA 918 Keywords: Criminal Law, Drug Trafficking, Evidence, Unreasonable Search and Seizure, Search Warrants, R v Marakah, 2017 SCC 59, R v Tsekouras, 2017 ONCA 290, R v Garofoli, [1990] 2 SCR 1421, R v Wu, 2015 ONCA 667, R v Spencer, 2014 SCC 43, R v Grant, 2009 SCC 32, Can......
  • Expectation Of Privacy In Text Message Conversations More Stringent In Canada Than The U.S.
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • January 30, 2018
    ...highest court, the Supreme Court of Canada (the "SCC"), recently decided in R. v. Marakah, 2017 SCC 59, ("Marakah") that Canadians have a reasonable expectation of privacy in the text messages they send, even after they have been received by the recipient. With this seminal ruling, the SCC ......
  • Get Started for Free
65 books & journal articles
  • Introduction to Information and Privacy Law
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Information and Privacy Law in Canada
    • June 25, 2020
    ...is sometimes defined as “the claim of individuals, groups, or institutions to determine for themselves when, how, and to 91 R v Marakah , 2017 SCC 59 at paras 14–17 [ Marakah ]. See also R v Jones , 2017 SCC 60 at para 14 [ Jones ]. 92 Marakah , above note 91 at paras 20–21; Mills 2019, abo......
  • When Hackers Strike: The Liability of Reckless Record Holders for Intrusion Upon Seclusion
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Canadian Class Action Review No. 16-1, December 2020
    • December 1, 2020
    ...R v Spencer, 2014 SCC 43, [2014] 2 SCR 212 [Spencer] at paras 17 and 35. See also R v Dyment, [1988] 2 SCR 417 at para 427; R v Marakah, 2017 SCC 59, [2017] 2 SCR 608 at para 41; Jarvis, above at note 44 at para 51; Waldman, above note 4 at 793n114. 60 Spencer, above note 59 at para 15 [cit......
  • A Call for Clarity: Ontario’s Disjointed Privacy Class Actions and the Need for Privacy Law Reform
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Canadian Class Action Review No. 16-1, December 2020
    • December 1, 2020
    ...R v Spencer, 2014 SCC 43, [2014] 2 SCR 212 [Spencer] at paras 17 and 35. See also R v Dyment, [1988] 2 SCR 417 at para 427; R v Marakah, 2017 SCC 59, [2017] 2 SCR 608 at para 41; Jarvis, above at note 44 at para 51; Waldman, above note 4 at 793n114. 60 Spencer, above note 59 at para 15 [cit......
  • Table of Cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books National Security Law. Second Edition Accountability
    • August 5, 2021
    ...547 Table of Cases 735 R v Mapara, [2005] 1 SCR 358, 251 DLR (4th) 385, 2005 SCC 23 ....................408 R v Marakah, 2017 SCC 59 ................................................................................. 413 R v McKinlay Transport Ltd, [1990] 1 SCR 627 .................................
  • Get Started for Free

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT