R. v. Martel, (1982) 38 A.R. 177 (NWTSC)
Judge | de Weerdt, J. |
Court | Supreme Court of Northwest Territories (Canada) |
Case Date | August 05, 1982 |
Jurisdiction | Northwest Territories |
Citations | (1982), 38 A.R. 177 (NWTSC) |
R. v. Martel (1982), 38 A.R. 177 (NWTSC)
MLB headnote and full text
R. v. Martel
(S.C. 2544)
Indexed As: R. v. Martel
Northwest Territories Supreme Court
de Weerdt, J.
August 5, 1982
Summary:
The Crown appealed the acquittal of an accused on a charge of failing to appear in court, pursuant to an undertaking, contrary to s. 133(3)(b) of the Criminal Code of Canada, R.S.C. 1970, c. C-34.
The Northwest Territories Supreme Court dismissed the appeal.
Criminal Law - Topic 6923
Recognizances and undertakings - Cancellation - Conditions precedent - The Crown appealed the acquittal of an accused on a charge of failing to appear in court, pursuant to an undertaking - The judge who took the undertaking later cancelled it under s. 485(5) of the Criminal Code - The judge did not have the undertaking before him at the time of cancellation, nor did he endorse the undertaking to show that it was cancelled - The Northwest Territories Supreme Court stated that it would be impracticable to require a judge to wait until every applicable undertaking was before him as a precondition of exercising his powers of cancellation under s. 485(5) - See paragraph 7.
Cases Noticed:
R. v. Baert (1981), 28 A.R. 313; 14 Alta. L.R.(2d) 310, (Alta. C.A.), refd to. [para. 7].
Re Perrault v. R. (1982), 15 Sask.R. 341; 65 C.C.C.(2d) 279 (Sask. C.A.), refd to. [para. 7].
R. v. Ouellette, [1980] 1 S.C.R. 568; 32 N.R. 361; 52 C.C.C.(2d) 336; 15 C.R.(3d) 372, affing 50 C.C.C.(2d) 346 (Que. C.A.), refd to. [para. 10].
Statutes Noticed:
Criminal Code of Canada, R.S.C. 1970, c. C-34, sect. 133(3)(b) [para. 2]; sect. 458(5)(a) [para. 1].
Counsel:
B. Fontaine, for the appellant;
J.C. Morris, for the respondent.
This appeal was heard before deWEERDT, J., of the Northwest Territories Supreme Court, who delivered the following judgment on August 5, 1982.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
R. v. Rhodes (K.H.C.), (2013) 297 Man.R.(2d) 114 (QB)
...331; 2011 ONSC 3092, refd to. [para. 39]. R. v. Major (1990), 76 C.R.(3d) 104 (Ont. Dist. Ct.), refd to. [para. 40]. R. v. Martel (1982), 38 A.R. 177 (N.W.T.S.C.), refd to. [para. R. v. Barbeau (1998), 131 C.C.C.(3d) 350 (Que. C.A.), refd to. [para. 52]. R. v. Ranger (R.) (2003), 180 O.A.C.......
-
R. v. Rhodes (K.H.C.), (2013) 297 Man.R.(2d) 114 (QB)
...331; 2011 ONSC 3092, refd to. [para. 39]. R. v. Major (1990), 76 C.R.(3d) 104 (Ont. Dist. Ct.), refd to. [para. 40]. R. v. Martel (1982), 38 A.R. 177 (N.W.T.S.C.), refd to. [para. R. v. Barbeau (1998), 131 C.C.C.(3d) 350 (Que. C.A.), refd to. [para. 52]. R. v. Ranger (R.) (2003), 180 O.A.C.......