R. v. Martel, (1982) 38 A.R. 177 (NWTSC)

Judgede Weerdt, J.
CourtSupreme Court of Northwest Territories (Canada)
Case DateAugust 05, 1982
JurisdictionNorthwest Territories
Citations(1982), 38 A.R. 177 (NWTSC)

R. v. Martel (1982), 38 A.R. 177 (NWTSC)

MLB headnote and full text

R. v. Martel

(S.C. 2544)

Indexed As: R. v. Martel

Northwest Territories Supreme Court

de Weerdt, J.

August 5, 1982

Summary:

The Crown appealed the acquittal of an accused on a charge of failing to appear in court, pursuant to an undertaking, contrary to s. 133(3)(b) of the Criminal Code of Canada, R.S.C. 1970, c. C-34.

The Northwest Territories Supreme Court dismissed the appeal.

Criminal Law - Topic 6923

Recognizances and undertakings - Cancellation - Conditions precedent - The Crown appealed the acquittal of an accused on a charge of failing to appear in court, pursuant to an undertaking - The judge who took the undertaking later cancelled it under s. 485(5) of the Criminal Code - The judge did not have the undertaking before him at the time of cancellation, nor did he endorse the undertaking to show that it was cancelled - The Northwest Territories Supreme Court stated that it would be impracticable to require a judge to wait until every applicable undertaking was before him as a precondition of exercising his powers of cancellation under s. 485(5) - See paragraph 7.

Cases Noticed:

R. v. Baert (1981), 28 A.R. 313; 14 Alta. L.R.(2d) 310, (Alta. C.A.), refd to. [para. 7].

Re Perrault v. R. (1982), 15 Sask.R. 341; 65 C.C.C.(2d) 279 (Sask. C.A.), refd to. [para. 7].

R. v. Ouellette, [1980] 1 S.C.R. 568; 32 N.R. 361; 52 C.C.C.(2d) 336; 15 C.R.(3d) 372, affing 50 C.C.C.(2d) 346 (Que. C.A.), refd to. [para. 10].

Statutes Noticed:

Criminal Code of Canada, R.S.C. 1970, c. C-34, sect. 133(3)(b) [para. 2]; sect. 458(5)(a) [para. 1].

Counsel:

B. Fontaine, for the appellant;

J.C. Morris, for the respondent.

This appeal was heard before deWEERDT, J., of the Northwest Territories Supreme Court, who delivered the following judgment on August 5, 1982.

To continue reading

Request your trial
1 practice notes
  • R. v. Rhodes (K.H.C.), (2013) 297 Man.R.(2d) 114 (QB)
    • Canada
    • Manitoba Court of Queen's Bench of Manitoba (Canada)
    • 21 Octubre 2013
    ...331; 2011 ONSC 3092, refd to. [para. 39]. R. v. Major (1990), 76 C.R.(3d) 104 (Ont. Dist. Ct.), refd to. [para. 40]. R. v. Martel (1982), 38 A.R. 177 (N.W.T.S.C.), refd to. [para. R. v. Barbeau (1998), 131 C.C.C.(3d) 350 (Que. C.A.), refd to. [para. 52]. R. v. Ranger (R.) (2003), 180 O.A.C.......
1 cases
  • R. v. Rhodes (K.H.C.), (2013) 297 Man.R.(2d) 114 (QB)
    • Canada
    • Manitoba Court of Queen's Bench of Manitoba (Canada)
    • 21 Octubre 2013
    ...331; 2011 ONSC 3092, refd to. [para. 39]. R. v. Major (1990), 76 C.R.(3d) 104 (Ont. Dist. Ct.), refd to. [para. 40]. R. v. Martel (1982), 38 A.R. 177 (N.W.T.S.C.), refd to. [para. R. v. Barbeau (1998), 131 C.C.C.(3d) 350 (Que. C.A.), refd to. [para. 52]. R. v. Ranger (R.) (2003), 180 O.A.C.......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT