R. v. Martin (D.A.), 2004 YKTC 100

JudgeFaulkner, J.
CourtTerritorial Court of Yukon (Canada)
Case DateJanuary 28, 2005
JurisdictionYukon
Citations2004 YKTC 100;[2004] Yukon Cases (TerrCt) 100

R. v. Martin (D.A.), [2004] Yukon Cases (TerrCt) 100

MLB headnote and full text

Temp. Cite: [2005] Yukon Cases TBEd. FE.081

Regina v. Donald Alexander Martin

(T.C. 01-00227; 2004 YKTC 100)

Indexed As: R. v. Martin (D.A.)

Yukon Territorial Court

Whitehorse

Faulkner, J.

January 28, 2005.

Summary:

This headnote contains no summary.

Criminal Law - Topic 5667

Punishments (sentence) - Imprisonment and parole - Parole - Forfeiture, revocation or termination of - See paragraphs 1 to 19.

Cases Noticed:

R. v. Paquette (1980), 53 C.C.C.(2d) 281 (Alta. Q.B.), refd to. [para. 10].

R. v. Noble, [1966] 3 C.C.C. 66 (N.B.C.A.), refd to. [para. 12].

R. v. Montanaro (1980), 55 C.C.C.(2d) 143 (Que. C.A.), refd to. [para. 13].

R. v. Tuckey (1977), 34 C.C.C.(2d) 572 (Ont. C.A.), refd to. [para. 14].

R. v. Borland, [1970] 2 C.C.C. 172 (N.W.T.T.C.), refd to. [para. 14].

Counsel:

Michael Cozens, for the Crown;

Gord Coffin, for the defence.

This application was heard before Faulkner, J., of the Yukon Territorial Court, who delivered the following judgment on January 28, 2005.

Please note: The following judgment has not been edited.

To continue reading

Request your trial
1 practice notes
  • R. v. Tom (D.A.), [2012] Yukon Cases Uned. 55
    • Canada
    • Territorial Court of Yukon (Canada)
    • June 29, 2012
    ...can only be revoked when the offender is subsequently convicted of an offence while bound by the probation order (See R. v. Martin 2004 YKTC 100 at paras. 8 and 9), and Mr. Tom was not convicted of the offences to which he plead guilty until the date of his sentencing hearing on June 6, the......
1 cases
  • R. v. Tom (D.A.), [2012] Yukon Cases Uned. 55
    • Canada
    • Territorial Court of Yukon (Canada)
    • June 29, 2012
    ...can only be revoked when the offender is subsequently convicted of an offence while bound by the probation order (See R. v. Martin 2004 YKTC 100 at paras. 8 and 9), and Mr. Tom was not convicted of the offences to which he plead guilty until the date of his sentencing hearing on June 6, the......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT