R. v. Mattu, 2019 ONCJ 517

JurisdictionOntario
JudgeJustice M.M. Rahman
Citation2019 ONCJ 517
Docket NumberBrampton 18-7917
CourtOntario Court of Justice General Division (Canada)
Date15 July 2019
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
4 practice notes
  • R. v. O,
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • May 20, 2021
    ...the side profile typically available to the trier of fact in the courtroom: R. v. MacKinnon, 2021 ONSC 2749, at para. 84; R. v. Mattu, 2019 ONCJ 517, at para. [15]      Further, while a court can consider a witness’ demeanour in assessing credibility, case la......
  • R. v. Polmateer,
    • Canada
    • Ontario Court of Justice General Division (Canada)
    • May 10, 2022
    ...by video link [2018 ONSC 2370]”.   [56]        The Crown also notes R. v Mattu, 2019 ONCJ 517:   [12]   I am not concerned that the video link will interfere with either the court’s ability to assess A.B.’s evidence......
  • R. v. J.R.T.,
    • Canada
    • Ontario Court of Justice General Division (Canada)
    • August 24, 2021
    ...technology is sufficiently sophisticated as to capture a variety of non-verbal cues and expressions.  As observed in R. v. Mattu 2019 ONCJ 517, video testimony may be superior insofar as the camera angles, close up views and full face on views allow for a closer depiction of the witnes......
  • G.S. v. K.C., 2020 ONSC 210
    • Canada
    • Ontario Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • January 13, 2020
    ...cross-examining counsel is within the discretion of the trial judge: R. v Belem, 2017 ONSC 2213, at paras. 35 – 38; R. v. Mattu, 2019 ONCJ 517, at paras. 20 – [26]           Given the availability of these testimonial accommoda......
4 cases
  • R. v. O,
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • May 20, 2021
    ...the side profile typically available to the trier of fact in the courtroom: R. v. MacKinnon, 2021 ONSC 2749, at para. 84; R. v. Mattu, 2019 ONCJ 517, at para. [15]      Further, while a court can consider a witness’ demeanour in assessing credibility, case la......
  • R. v. Polmateer,
    • Canada
    • Ontario Court of Justice General Division (Canada)
    • May 10, 2022
    ...by video link [2018 ONSC 2370]”.   [56]        The Crown also notes R. v Mattu, 2019 ONCJ 517:   [12]   I am not concerned that the video link will interfere with either the court’s ability to assess A.B.’s evidence......
  • R. v. J.R.T.,
    • Canada
    • Ontario Court of Justice General Division (Canada)
    • August 24, 2021
    ...technology is sufficiently sophisticated as to capture a variety of non-verbal cues and expressions.  As observed in R. v. Mattu 2019 ONCJ 517, video testimony may be superior insofar as the camera angles, close up views and full face on views allow for a closer depiction of the witnes......
  • G.S. v. K.C., 2020 ONSC 210
    • Canada
    • Ontario Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • January 13, 2020
    ...cross-examining counsel is within the discretion of the trial judge: R. v Belem, 2017 ONSC 2213, at paras. 35 – 38; R. v. Mattu, 2019 ONCJ 517, at paras. 20 – [26]           Given the availability of these testimonial accommoda......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT