R v Mavros, 2020 ABCA 436
| Jurisdiction | Alberta |
| Judge | The Honourable Mr. Justice Thomas W. Wakeling,The Honourable Madam Justice Michelle Crighton,The Honourable Mr. Justice Kevin Feehan |
| Date | 07 December 2020 |
| Citation | 2020 ABCA 436 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Alberta) |
| Docket Number | 2003-0011-A |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
6 practice notes
-
R v Mavros,
...to convictions on those offences are set out in detail in the decision of the court below and in this Court’s decision reported at 2020 ABCA 436. In summary, this Court … late on the evening of April 10, 2009, Mr Mavros met [the complainant] for a third time for sex in a motel......
-
R v Chui,
.... If a trial is unfair, it would qualify as a miscarriage of justice under s 686(1)(a)(iii) of the Criminal Code”); The Queen v. Mavros, 2020 ABCA 436, ¶ 12 (“Trial fairness is a question of law. A trial must be conducted fairly. An appeal court makes this assessment. A trial is either cond......
-
R v Algiak,
...methodology in determining credibility, the error is one of law and the standard of review is correctness: SMC, para 20, R v Mavros, 2020 ABCA 436, para 11. [10] The standard of review on sentence appeals is deferential. An appellate court may not interfere with a sentence unless it is demo......
-
R v Ahmad,
...on all that they see and hear relative to a witness, but also to apply contemporary common sense in the context of the trial: R v Mavros, 2020 ABCA 436 at para [71] In order to succeed on a claim of uneven scrutiny, an Appellant must meet the thresh......
Request a trial to view additional results
6 cases
-
R v Mavros,
...to convictions on those offences are set out in detail in the decision of the court below and in this Court’s decision reported at 2020 ABCA 436. In summary, this Court … late on the evening of April 10, 2009, Mr Mavros met [the complainant] for a third time for sex in a motel......
-
R v Chui,
.... If a trial is unfair, it would qualify as a miscarriage of justice under s 686(1)(a)(iii) of the Criminal Code”); The Queen v. Mavros, 2020 ABCA 436, ¶ 12 (“Trial fairness is a question of law. A trial must be conducted fairly. An appeal court makes this assessment. A trial is either cond......
-
R v Algiak,
...methodology in determining credibility, the error is one of law and the standard of review is correctness: SMC, para 20, R v Mavros, 2020 ABCA 436, para 11. [10] The standard of review on sentence appeals is deferential. An appellate court may not interfere with a sentence unless it is demo......
-
R v Ahmad,
...on all that they see and hear relative to a witness, but also to apply contemporary common sense in the context of the trial: R v Mavros, 2020 ABCA 436 at para [71] In order to succeed on a claim of uneven scrutiny, an Appellant must meet the thresh......
Request a trial to view additional results