R. v. Maximnuk (W.), 2016 SKQB 202
Jurisdiction | Saskatchewan |
Judge | Dawson, J. |
Court | Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada) |
Subject Matter | CRIMINAL LAW |
Date | 10 June 2016 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
3 practice notes
-
R v Babich,
...Counsel have referred me to a number of cases: R v Payne, [2018] NJ No. 153; R v Maximnuk, 2016 SKQB 202; R v Nanatakapo, 2010 SKPC 14; R v Verkland, 2002 ABQB 987; R v Herbert, 2001 ABPC 202. The most succinct and useful is R v Penner, 2019 BCCA 76, which at paragraph 30 sets o......
-
R v Maximnuk, 2017 SKCA 87
...Madam Justice Jackson In concurrence: The Honourable Mr. Justice Herauf The Honourable Madam Justice Ryan-Froslie On Appeal From: 2016 SKQB 202 and 2016 SKQB 338 , Appeal Heard: 17-10-2017 Counsel: William Maximnuk appearing on his own behalf Andrew Stuart Davis for the Respondent Jackson ......
-
R v Hale, 2017 ABCA 308
...a reasonably prudent person would exercise in the same circumstances, relying on a statement to that effect in the case of R v Maximnuk, 2016 SKQB 202 from the Saskatchewan Court of Queen’s Bench in 2016. He argued that residing in a rural area with children in the house and the possibility......
3 cases
-
R v Maximnuk, 2017 SKCA 87
...Madam Justice Jackson In concurrence: The Honourable Mr. Justice Herauf The Honourable Madam Justice Ryan-Froslie On Appeal From: 2016 SKQB 202 and 2016 SKQB 338 , Appeal Heard: 17-10-2017 Counsel: William Maximnuk appearing on his own behalf Andrew Stuart Davis for the Respondent Jackson ......
-
R v Babich,
...Counsel have referred me to a number of cases: R v Payne, [2018] NJ No. 153; R v Maximnuk, 2016 SKQB 202; R v Nanatakapo, 2010 SKPC 14; R v Verkland, 2002 ABQB 987; R v Herbert, 2001 ABPC 202. The most succinct and useful is R v Penner, 2019 BCCA 76, which at paragraph 30 sets o......
-
R v Hale, 2017 ABCA 308
...a reasonably prudent person would exercise in the same circumstances, relying on a statement to that effect in the case of R v Maximnuk, 2016 SKQB 202 from the Saskatchewan Court of Queen’s Bench in 2016. He argued that residing in a rural area with children in the house and the possibility......