R. v. Maximnuk (W.), 2016 SKQB 202

JurisdictionSaskatchewan
JudgeDawson, J.
CourtCourt of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
Subject MatterCRIMINAL LAW
Date10 June 2016
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
3 practice notes
  • R v Babich,
    • Canada
    • Provincial Court of Alberta (Canada)
    • May 15, 2021
    ...Counsel have referred me to a number of cases: R v Payne, [2018] NJ No. 153; R  v Maximnuk, 2016 SKQB 202; R  v Nanatakapo, 2010 SKPC 14; R v Verkland, 2002 ABQB 987; R v Herbert, 2001 ABPC 202. The most succinct and useful is R v Penner, 2019 BCCA 76, which at paragraph 30 sets o......
  • R v Maximnuk, 2017 SKCA 87
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • October 17, 2017
    ...Madam Justice Jackson In concurrence: The Honourable Mr. Justice Herauf The Honourable Madam Justice Ryan-Froslie On Appeal From: 2016 SKQB 202 and 2016 SKQB 338 , Appeal Heard: 17-10-2017 Counsel: William Maximnuk appearing on his own behalf Andrew Stuart Davis for the Respondent Jackson ......
  • R v Hale, 2017 ABCA 308
    • Canada
    • Alberta Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • September 26, 2017
    ...a reasonably prudent person would exercise in the same circumstances, relying on a statement to that effect in the case of R v Maximnuk, 2016 SKQB 202 from the Saskatchewan Court of Queen’s Bench in 2016. He argued that residing in a rural area with children in the house and the possibility......
3 cases
  • R v Maximnuk, 2017 SKCA 87
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • October 17, 2017
    ...Madam Justice Jackson In concurrence: The Honourable Mr. Justice Herauf The Honourable Madam Justice Ryan-Froslie On Appeal From: 2016 SKQB 202 and 2016 SKQB 338 , Appeal Heard: 17-10-2017 Counsel: William Maximnuk appearing on his own behalf Andrew Stuart Davis for the Respondent Jackson ......
  • R v Babich,
    • Canada
    • Provincial Court of Alberta (Canada)
    • May 15, 2021
    ...Counsel have referred me to a number of cases: R v Payne, [2018] NJ No. 153; R  v Maximnuk, 2016 SKQB 202; R  v Nanatakapo, 2010 SKPC 14; R v Verkland, 2002 ABQB 987; R v Herbert, 2001 ABPC 202. The most succinct and useful is R v Penner, 2019 BCCA 76, which at paragraph 30 sets o......
  • R v Hale, 2017 ABCA 308
    • Canada
    • Alberta Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • September 26, 2017
    ...a reasonably prudent person would exercise in the same circumstances, relying on a statement to that effect in the case of R v Maximnuk, 2016 SKQB 202 from the Saskatchewan Court of Queen’s Bench in 2016. He argued that residing in a rural area with children in the house and the possibility......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT